The Effect of Vigor, Dedication and Absorption on the Employee Performance of PT Garuda Indonesia Cargo



Abstract Views
3989

Downloads
7155

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 29, 2021
Published Aug 21, 2021
10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.4.1006

Abstract viewed = 3989 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study aims to analyze the effect of vigor, dedication and absorption on the employee performance of PT Garuda Indonesia Cargo. The object of this study is the employees of PT Garuda Indonesia at the Head Office Cargo Directorate, which is located in the Cargo Area of Soekarno-Hatta Airport. The population of this study is 93 employees of PT Garuda Indonesia at the Head Office Cargo Directorate. The sampling method used is a census sample. Therefore, the sample of this study is 93 employees. Multiple linear regression analysis is used in this study with the help of the SPSS application version 26. The results of this study indicate that simultaneously, vigor, dedication and absorption have a positive and significant effect on employee performance. Partially, both vigor and dedication have a significant positive effect on employee performance. Meanwhile, absorption has no effect and is not significant. The magnitude of the influence (R Square) of vigor, dedication and absorption on employee performance is 48,1%.

Keywords: Absorption, Dedication, Employee Performance, Vigor

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. G. Indonesia, “Standing Strong into the Future (Annual Report Garuda Indonesia 2019),” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.garuda-indonesia.com/content/dam/garuda/files/pdf/investor-relations/report/AR2019.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  2. K. S. Kumar, R. Arasu, and S. Nagarajan, “The Impact of Employee Engagement on Employee Empowerment,” Harv. Bus. Rev., no. May, pp. 1–8, 2014, [Online]. Available: hbr.org/hbr-analytic-services.
     Google Scholar
  3. B. Motyka, “Employee engagement and performance: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. Manag. Econ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 227–244, 2018, doi: 10.2478/ijme-2018-0018.
     Google Scholar
  4. S. Riyanto, E. Ariyanto, and L. Lukertina, “Work Life Balance and Its Influence on Employee Engagement ‘Y’ Generation in Courier Service Industry,” Int. Rev. Manag. Mark., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 25–31, 2019, doi: 10.32479/irmm.8499.
     Google Scholar
  5. W. B. Schaufeli, “Work Engagement. What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Work Engagement in Everyday Life, Business, and Academia,” Rom. J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  6. J. Hanaysha, “Improving employee productivity through work engagement: Evidence from higher education sector,” Manag. Sci. Lett., no. January, pp. 61–70, 2016, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2015.11.006.
     Google Scholar
  7. R. J. Burke and G. El-Kot, “Work engagement among managers and professionals in Egypt: Potential antecedents and consequences,” African J. Econ. Manag. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–60, 2010, doi: 10.1108/20400701011028158.
     Google Scholar
  8. A. A. Shusha and A. Abdelkader, “Work engagement in higher education in Egypt: The influence on academic work performance,” Int. J. Bus. Perform. Manag., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 132–146, 2016, doi: 10.1504/IJBPM.2016.075535.
     Google Scholar
  9. K. Sendawula, S. Nakyejwe Kimuli, J. Bananuka, and G. Najjemba Muganga, “Training, employee engagement and employee performance: Evidence from Uganda’s health sector,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2018.1470891.
     Google Scholar
  10. K. Sittar, “Relationship of Work Engagements and Job Performance of University Teachers.,” Bull. Educ. Res., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 167–183, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  11. H. Fan and D. Cai, “Employee Engagement and Job Performance of Employees—a Study from Hospitality and Tourism in Hainan,” DEStech Trans. Soc. Sci. Educ. Hum. Sci., no. eemt, pp. 586–591, 2017, doi: 10.12783/dtssehs/eemt2017/14542.
     Google Scholar
  12. M. R. Bamidele and K. T. Konya, “Employee Dedication and Performance of Transport Operators in the Marine Sector in,” vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 18–33, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  13. M. Al-dalahmeh, R. Masa’deh, R. K. Abu Khalaf, and B. Y. Obeidat, “The Effect of Employee Engagement on Organizational Performance Via the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction: The Case of IT Employees in Jordanian Banking Sector,” Mod. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, p. 17, 2018, doi: 10.5539/mas.v12n6p17.
     Google Scholar
  14. A. Permana, M. H. Aima, E. Ariyanto, and A. Nurmahdi, “The effect of leadership style, motivation and discipline of employee performance with understanding of islamic work ethics,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1098–1106, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  15. L. Koopmans, C. Bernaards, V. Hildebrandt, S. Van Buuren, A. J. Van Der Beek, and H. C. w. de Vet, “Development of an individual work performance questionnaire,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 6–28, 2012, doi: 10.1108/17410401311285273.
     Google Scholar
  16. Arie Shirom, “Feeling energetic at work: On vigor’s antecedents,” in Work engagement : A handbook of essential theory and research. ProQuest Ebook Central https://www.proquest.com, 2010, pp. 69–84.
     Google Scholar
  17. H. Shekari, “Evaluating the Three Dimensions of Work Engagement in Social Security Organization of Yazd Province in Iran,” J. Educ. Manag. Stud., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 168–174, 2015, [Online]. Available: www.science-line.com.
     Google Scholar
  18. A. B. Bakker, W. B. Schaufeli, M. P. Leiter, and T. W. Taris, “Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology,” Work Stress, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 187–200, 2008, doi: 10.1080/02678370802393649.
     Google Scholar
  19. V. V. Sadovaya and G. I. Korchagina, “Psychological model of a person dedicated to his profession,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2047–2057, 2016, doi: 10.12973/ijese.2016.577a.
     Google Scholar
  20. J. R. Van Scotter and S. J. Motowidlo, “Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 525–531, 1996, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525.
     Google Scholar
  21. B. A. Rayton and Z. Y. Yalabik, “Work engagement, psychological contract breach and job satisfaction,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 25, no. 17. Taylor & Francis, pp. 2382–2400, 2014, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.876440.
     Google Scholar
  22. A. J., “Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 308–323, 2014, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008.
     Google Scholar
  23. J. van Wingerden, D. Derks, and A. B. Bakker, “Facilitating interns’ performance: The role of job resources, basic need satisfaction and work engagement,” Career Dev. Int., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 382–396, 2018, doi: 10.1108/CDI-12-2017-0237.
     Google Scholar
  24. G. Yongxing, D. Hongfei, X. Baoguo, and M. Lei, “Work engagement and job performance: The moderating role of perceived organizational support,” An. Psicol., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 708–713, 2017, doi: 10.6018/analesps.33.3.238571.
     Google Scholar
  25. N. Yin, “The Effect of Job Engagement on Job Burnout and Job Performance: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Justice,” Int. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 12, no. 5, p. 177, 2017, doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v12n5p177.
     Google Scholar