Proposed Performance Management System for A Project-based Renewable Energy Startup



Abstract Views
926

Downloads
912

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Aug 7, 2021
Published Aug 29, 2021
10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.4.1039

Abstract viewed = 926 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The number of startups in Indonesia has surpassed 2,000 companies, but only a handful have survived and thrived in the VUCA world. One of the failure causes is the lack of good business management in translating the company’s vision and strategy into clear and measurable objectives. For a project-based renewable energy startup, as the current study’s focus, it is necessary to focus not only on generating revenue but also on achieving the company’s vision and mission to sustain. To address this, we formulated an integrated framework related to the Performance Management System of the renewable energy startup. We combined the Balanced Scorecard as a tool for communicating the company’s strategies, Key Performance Indicators as a corporate performance tracking tool, and Objectives and Key Results for a daily basis or short-term goal-setting tool. It is also complemented by the idea of Ethical Climate to embed ethics into the system. Finally, quantifiable company performance measures will be obtained to assist the startup in the decision-making process related to appropriate strategies for corporate sustainability.

Keywords: Balanced Scorecard, Key Performance Indicators, Objectives and Key Results, Performance Management System

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. KOMPAS.com, “Menkominfo Pamerkan Pesatnya Perkembangan Startup Indonesia,” 2020. https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/23975/di-wef-2020-menkominfo-pamerkan-pesatnya-perkembangan-startup-indonesia/0/sorotan_media (accessed Apr. 10, 2021).
     Google Scholar
  2. S. Ranking, “Countries,” 2021. https://www.startupranking.com/countries (accessed Apr. 10, 2021).
     Google Scholar
  3. C. Llorach and E. Ottoson, “The Balanced Scorecard during the Early Stages of a Tech Firm - A Multiple Case Study Regarding Performance Management in Swedish Tech Startups,” Uppsala University, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  4. M. Armstrong, Armstrong’s Handbook of Performance Management: An Evidence-based Guide to Delivering High Performance, Sixth. New York: Kogan Page, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  5. B. Kaviya and C. Hema, “Performance Management in Construction,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2093–2100, 2015, doi: 10.15680/IJIRSET.2015.0404124.
     Google Scholar
  6. R. A. Noe, J. R. Hollenbeck, B. Gerhart, and P. M. Wright, Human Resource Management: Gaining A Competitive Advantage, 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  7. B. Patel, A. Patel, and A. Sharma, “Examining the Role of HR Professionals in Developing Efficient and Effective Performance Management Systems,” AAYAM, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  8. L. Darino, M. Sieberer, A. Vos, and O. Williams, “Performance Management in Agile Organizations,” New York, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/performance-management-in-agile-organizations.
     Google Scholar
  9. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action.” President and Fellows of Harvard College, USA, pp. 1–329, 1996, [Online]. Available: https://b-ok.asia/book.
     Google Scholar
  10. P. R. Niven, Balanced Scorecard Step-By-Step, Second., no. June. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
     Google Scholar
  11. S. Schmidt, I. Bateman, J. Breinlinger-O’Reilly, and P. Smith, “A Management Approach that Drives Actions Strategically: Balanced Scorecard in A Mental Health Trust Case Study,” Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 119–135, 2006, doi: 10.1108/09526860610651663.
     Google Scholar
  12. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  13. S. Cohen, D. Thiraios, and M. Kandilorou, “Performance parameters interrelations from a balanced scorecard perspective: An analysis of Greek companies,” Manag. Audit. J., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 485–503, 2008, doi: 10.1108/02686900810875307.
     Google Scholar
  14. C. C. Villazón, L. S. Pinilla, J. R. O. Olaso, N. T. Gandarias, and N. L. de Lacalle, “Identification of key performance indicators in project-based organizations through the lean approach,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 5977, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12155977.
     Google Scholar
  15. D. Parmenter, Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs, Third. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015.
     Google Scholar
  16. B. M. Popa, “Challenges When Developing Performance Indicators,” J. Def. Resour. Manag., vol. 6, no. 1(10), pp. 111–114, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  17. H. Kerzner, Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance, Third. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017.
     Google Scholar
  18. P. Naiyananont and T. Smuthranond, “Relationships between ethical climate, political behavior, ethical leadership, and job satisfaction of operational officers in a wholesale company, Bangkok Metropolitan region,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 38, pp. 345–351, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2016.07.005.
     Google Scholar
  19. A. Sert, M. Elçi, T. Uslu, and İ. Şener, “The Effects of Organizational Justice and Ethical Climate on Perceived Work Related Stress,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 150, pp. 1187–1198, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.134.
     Google Scholar
  20. A. Tziner, M. Felea, and C. Vasiliu, “Relating ethical climate, organizational justice perceptions, and leader-member exchange (LMX) in Romanian organizations,” J. Work Organ. Psychol., vol. 31, pp. 51–57, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.02.005.
     Google Scholar
  21. B. Victor and J. B. Cullen, “The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climate,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 33, pp. 101–125, 1988.
     Google Scholar
  22. M. Yener, M. Yaldiran, and S. Ergun, “The Effect Of Ethical Climate On Work Engagement,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 58, pp. 724–733, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1050.
     Google Scholar
  23. A. Newman, H. Round, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Roy, “Ethical Climates in Organizations : A Review and Research Agenda,” Bus. Ethics Q., vol. 4, no. October, pp. 475–512, 2017, doi: 10.1017/beq.2017.23.
     Google Scholar
  24. J. E. Doerr, Measure What Matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World with OKRs. New York: Penguin Random House LLC, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  25. D. Wilsey, “Using OKRs with Balanced Scorecard,” North Carolina, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://balancedscorecard.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/BSI-Using-OKRs-with-Balanced-Scorecard.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  26. X. Islami, E. Mulolli, and N. Mustafa, “Using Management by Objectives as a performance appraisal tool for employee satisfaction,” Futur. Bus. J., vol. 4, pp. 94–108, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fbj.2018.01.001.
     Google Scholar
  27. R. L. Mathis and J. H. Jackson, Human Resource Management, Twelfth. Mason: Thomson Corporation, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  28. T. Donaldson and L. E. Preston, “The Stakeholder Theor of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–91, 1995, doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.
     Google Scholar
  29. M. Minoja, “Stakeholder Management Theory , Firm Strategy , and Ambidexterity,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1380-9.
     Google Scholar