The Impact of Non-Performing Loans, Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Loan to Deposit Ratios on Minimum Capital Adequacy Requirement Based on Commercial Banks for Business Activities (BUKU) I 2015-2020



Abstract Views
1350

Downloads
1954

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Sep 1, 2021
Published Nov 14, 2021
10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.6.1084

Abstract viewed = 1350 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The purpose of this research is to gain an understanding of The Impact of Non-Performing Loans, Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Loan to Deposit Ratios on Minimum Capital Adequacy Requirement Based on Commercial Banks for Business Activities (BUKU) I 2015-2020. The data of this research is obtained from financial reports published by each bank in 2015 to 2020 period. This research uses panel data processed using EViews software version 9.0. The results show that NPL negatively and insignificantly affects CAR. ROA gives positive and insignificant impacts toward CAR, while ROE causes negative and insignificant effects on CAR. In addition, there is positive and significant impacts on CAR caused by LDR.

Keywords: Commercial Banks for Business Activities (BUKU) I, Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Minimum Capital Adequacy Requirement (CAR), Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Return on Asset (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Andini, F., & Yunita, (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Return on Asset (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Dan Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) Terhadap Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Dindonesia. E-Proceeding of Management, 2 (2), 1384–1391.
     Google Scholar
  2. Dewa Ayu Anjani, & Ni Ketut Purnawati. (2012). Pengaruh Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Likuiditas Dan Rentabilitas Terhadap Rasio Kecukupan Moda, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana.
     Google Scholar
  3. Irdawati, Ansir, & Sinarwati. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor Fundamental Mikro Terhadap Capital Adequacy Ratio (The Effect of Micro Fundamental Factors on Capital Adequacy Ratio), Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Organisasi, e-ISSN: 2502-4175, 2(3), 12–26.
     Google Scholar
  4. Kasmir (2014). Dasar-Dasar Perbankan, 12th ed, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  5. Prasetya Adi Pratama. (2013)., Pengaruh NIM, NPL, ROA, LDR dan BOPO Terhadap Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Journal of Chemical information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
     Google Scholar
  6. Purnama Sari, A., Kusumawardhani, A., and Manajemen, J. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh NPL, BOPO, LDR, Dan Nopfe Terhadap CAR (Studi Empiris: Bank Pembangunan Daerah Sendonesia Periode 2012-2015, Diponegoro Journal of Management, 5(4), 1–8.
     Google Scholar
  7. Riyadi, S. (2006). Banking Assets and Liability Management (Ed. 3). Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
     Google Scholar
  8. Williams & Harley Tega (2011). Determinants of Capital Adequacy in The Banking Sub-Sector of the Nigeria Economy: Efficacy of Camels. (A Model Specification with Co-Integration Analysis). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1 (3), pp: 233-248.
     Google Scholar
  9. Yuanjuan, Li and Xiao Shishun (2012), Effectiveness of China's Commercial Banks' Capital Adequacy Ratio. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4 (1), pp: 58-68.
     Google Scholar
  10. Yuliani, K. P., Werastuti, D. N. S., and Edy, S. (2015) Pengaruh Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Return on Asset (ROA) dan Opersional terhadap Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO) terhadap Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) (Studi Pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (BUSN) Devisa), E-Journal Ak S1 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(1), 1–11.
     Google Scholar