##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study aims to determine the effect of quality of work life on worker performance when working from home (WFH) with job satisfaction and organizational commitment as intervening variables at PT Patra Jasa Head Office. The research method used is a quantitative method. The research population is all employees of PT Patra Jasa with a minimum working period of 1 year, which is 144 people. All members of the population are used as members of the sample (census technique). Primary data collection using a questionnaire instrument. The technique of analyzing and testing the hypothesis is using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) with the SmartPLS version 3.0 application. Partial results of hypothesis testing prove that the quality of work life, organizational commitment, and quality of work life through organizational commitment have no positive and significant effect on worker performance when WFH. Job satisfaction and quality of work life through job satisfaction have a positive and significant effect on worker performance when WFH. Furthermore, simultaneous hypothesis testing with multiple linear regression models has a coefficient of determination (R2) of 67%, quality of work life through job satisfaction and organizational commitment has a strong effect on worker performance when WFH.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Allen, N.J., & J.P., Meyer. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
     Google Scholar
  2. Alwi, S. (2002), Human resource management competitive advantage strategies. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
     Google Scholar
  3. Augustine, A., Muhammed, M. A., Agyapong, K. (2016). Perceived quality of work life and work performance among university academic staff. International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review, 4, 1-13.
     Google Scholar
  4. Bangun, W. (2012), Human resource management, Jakarta: Erlangga Publisher.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bernardin, J. H. & Russel J. E. A. (1993). Human resource management: an experiential approach, International Ed. Singapore: The McGraw-Hill Companies, inc.
     Google Scholar
  6. Fadlallh, A. W. (2015). Impact of job satisfaction on employees performance an aplication on faculty of science and humanity studies University of Salman bin Abdul Aziz Al Aflaj. Internationa Journal of Innovation and research in Educational Sciences., 2(1), 26-32.
     Google Scholar
  7. Farjad, H R. (2013). Study of relationship of quality of work life (QWL) and organizational commitment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(9), 449-456.
     Google Scholar
  8. Fatehi, B., Amini, I., Karimi, A., & Azizi, B. (2015). Impact of quality of work life on job (Case Study: Sport Teachers in Department of Education from Urmia). Research Journal of Sport Sciences, 3(1), 15-22.
     Google Scholar
  9. Folorunso, O.O., Adewale, A. J., & Abodunde, S.M. (2014). Exploring the effect of organizational commitment dimensions on employees performance: an empirical evidence from academic staff of Oyo State Owned Tertiary Institutions, Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(8).
     Google Scholar
  10. Ghozali, I & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares: concepts, techniques and applications using the SmartPLS 3.0 program. Semarang: UNDIP Publishing Agency.
     Google Scholar
  11. Gibson. J., Ivancevich, J., & Donelly, J. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, structure, processes. 14th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
     Google Scholar
  12. Hira, A., & Waqas, I. (2012). A study of job satisfaction and it’s impact on the performance in the Banking Industry of Pakistan. Internatonal Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(19), 174-180.
     Google Scholar
  13. Jogiyanto. (2011), Concepts and applications of variant-based structural equation modeling in business research, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: STIM YKPN.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kaswan. (2012), Human resource management for organizational competitive advantage. Yogyakarta: Grha Ilmu.
     Google Scholar
  15. Kermansaravi, F., Navidian, A., Rigi, S. N., & Yaghoubinia, F. (2015). The relationship between quality of work life and job satisfaction of faculty members in Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Global Journal of Health Sciences, 7(2), 228-234.
     Google Scholar
  16. Khan, A. H., Nawaz, M. M., Aleem, M., & Hamed, W. (2011). Impact of job satisfaction on employee performance: an empirical study of Automomous Medical Institutions of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 6(7), 2697-2705.
     Google Scholar
  17. Majumdar, M. N., Dawn, D., & Dutta, A. (2012). Impact of quality work-life on job performance: a case study on Indian Telecom Sector. International Journal of arts and Sciences, 5(6), 655-685.
     Google Scholar
  18. Mangkunegara, A. P. (2011), Corporate human resource management, 11th ed. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
     Google Scholar
  19. Memari, N., Mahdieh, O., & Marnani, A. B. (2013). The impact of organizational commitment on employees job performance: a study of Meli Bank. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Busines, 5(5), 164.
     Google Scholar
  20. Normala, D. (2010). Investigating the relationship between quality of work life and organizational commitment amongst employees in Malaysian Firms. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 75-82.
     Google Scholar
  21. Othman, A., & Lieng., M. C. (2009). Relationship between QWL and job satisfaction: a case study of enterprose XYZ in Malacca. International Conference on Human Capital Development. ISBN 978-967-5080-51-7.
     Google Scholar
  22. Rafiei, M., Amini, M. T., & Foroozandeh, N. (2014). Studying the impact of the organizational commitment on the job performance. Management Science Letters, 4, 1841–1848.
     Google Scholar
  23. Ramadan. (2015). Quality of work life on employee performance through organizational commitment and job satisfaction as intervening variable. Journal of Development Economics, 13(02).
     Google Scholar
  24. Rathamani, P., & Ramchandra, R. (2013). A study on quality of work life of employees in Textile Industry - Sipcot, Perundurai. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 8(3), 54-59.
     Google Scholar
  25. Rivai, Veithzal (2004), Human resource management for companies: from theory to practice, 1st ed. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Pesada.
     Google Scholar
  26. Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior. 17th ed. UK: Pearson Education Limited.
     Google Scholar
  27. Sajjad, N. K., & Abbasi, B. (2014). Studying the relationship between quality of work life and organizational commitment. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 3(2), 92-99.
     Google Scholar
  28. Setiyadi, Y. W. & Wartini, S. (2016). The effect of quality of work life on employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable. Management Analysis Journal, 5 (4).
     Google Scholar
  29. Shahbazi, B., Shokrzadeh, S., Bejani, H., Malekinia, E., & Ghoroneh, D. (2011). A survey of relationship between the quality of work life and performance of Department Chairpersons of Esfahan University and Esfahan Medical Science University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1555 – 1560.
     Google Scholar
  30. Weiss, D., Dawis, R., England, G., & Lofquist, L. (1967). Manual for the minnesota satisfaction questionaire. Washington DC: Research Grant RD-1613-G from the Vocational Rehabilitation Administration, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
     Google Scholar
  31. Zin, R.M. (2004). Perception of professional engineers toward quality of work life and organizational commitment a case study. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 6(3), 323-334.
     Google Scholar