Private Equity Impact on Corporate Innovation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This paper focuses on the influence of Private Equity (PE) firms on corporate innovation with the purpose of identifying opportunities such as new or enhanced strategies that PE firms would use to in order to increase the success rate of their acquisitions. The paper starts with a comprehensive literature review and creates a strong theoretical foundation about PE Leveraged Buyout (LBO) companies and their impact on corporate innovation. The methods used in this paper are the case study research, which is introduced to create theory [1] and the review-centric research approach of reviewing existing theory and research as well as for creating a new model of variables and relationships [2] that can be used to validate new hypotheses. The paper introduces a new model that is based on data collection from the review of existing theory and research. The model is a collection of variables that are categorized and linked together to depict new relationships that show the PE LBOs’ influence on corporate innovation. The research also identifies inconsistency in the existing research literature as an opportunity for future research. The research is limited by the duration of a semester which is the timeframe allotted to complete the research work. Develop understanding of the reasons some LBOs fail and strategies that will help PE firms increase the success rate of their investments and create a win-win scenario for investors, employees, and the entire value chain. This paper new concepts and ideas are completely derived from the theoretical foundation and the professional experience of the author.
Downloads
References
-
Eisenhardt, K.M., Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 1989. 14(4): p. 532-550.
Google Scholar
1
-
LePine, J.A. and A. Wilcox-King, Editors’ Comments: Developing Novel Theoretical InsightFrom Reviews of Existing Theory and Research. The Academy of Management Review, 2010. 35(4): p. 506-509.
Google Scholar
2
-
Lynn Newman, M.R., Avaya, 908-953-8692, lynnnewman@avaya.com,Reporter, Silver Lake and TPG Capital Complete Acquisition of Avaya, I. Avaya, Editor. 2007, Avaya Inc., 4655 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054-1233 USA: BASKING RIDGE, N.J.
Google Scholar
3
-
Deborah Lewandowski, C.C., North America, 630-245-2720, deblewan@avaya.com, Avaya Inc. Files for Chapter 11 Protection, I. Avaya, Editor. 2017, Avaya Inc., 4655 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054-1233 USA.
Google Scholar
4
-
Bass, B.M. and B.J. Avolio, Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 1993. 17(1): p. 112-121.
Google Scholar
5
-
Jeroen PJ, d.J.D.H., D.,N, How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2007. 10(1): p. 41-64.
Google Scholar
6
-
Barker, V.L. and G.C. Mueller, CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending. Management Science, 2002. 48(6): p. 782-801.
Google Scholar
7
-
John C Easterwood, A.S., Ronald F Singer, The impact of leveraged buyouts on strategic direction, in California Management Review;Berkeley. 1989. p. 30.
Google Scholar
8
-
Kaplan, S.N. and P. Stromberg, Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2009. 23(1): p. 121-146.
Google Scholar
9
-
Masulis, R.W. and R.S. Thomas, Does Private Equity Create Wealth? The Effects of Private Equity and Derivatives on Corporate Governance. The University of Chicago Law Review, 2009. 76(1): p. 219-259.
Google Scholar
10
-
Bertoni, F., et al., The different roles played by venture capital and private equity investors on the investment activity of their portfolio firms. Small Business Economics, 2013. 40(3): p. 607-633.
Google Scholar
11
-
Cotter, J.F. and S.W. Peck, The structure of debt and active equity investors: The case of the buyout specialist. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001. 59(1): p. 101-147.
Google Scholar
12
-
Amess, K. and M. Wright, Leveraged buyouts, private equity and jobs. Small Business Economics, 2012. 38(4): p. 419-430.
Google Scholar
13
-
Amess, K., J. Stiebale, and M. Wright, The impact of private equity on firms׳ patenting activity. European Economic Review, 2016. 86: p. 147-160.
Google Scholar
14
-
Bruining, H., E. Verwaal, and M. Wright, Private equity and entrepreneurial management in management buy-outs. Small Business Economics, 2013. 40(3): p. 591-605.
Google Scholar
15
-
Phan, P.H. and W.L.H. Charles, Organizational Restructuring and Economic Performance in Leveraged Buyouts: An Ex Post Study. The Academy of Management Journal, 1995. 38(3): p. 704-739.
Google Scholar
16
-
Zahra, S.A. and F. Michael, Will Leveraged Buyouts Kill U.S. Corporate Research & Development? The Executive, 1991. 5(4): p. 7-21.
Google Scholar
17
-
Hitt, M.A., et al., The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation. The Academy of Management Journal, 1996. 39(5): p. 1084-1119.
Google Scholar
18
-
Liebeskind, J., M. Wiersema, and G. Hansen, LBOs, Corporate Restructuring, and the Incentive-Intensity Hypothesis. Financial Management, 1992. 21(1): p. 73-88.
Google Scholar
19
-
Cumming, D., D.S. Siegel, and M. Wright, Private equity, leveraged buyouts and governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2007. 13(4): p. 439-460.
Google Scholar
20
-
Davis, S.J., et al., Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity. The American Economic Review, 2014. 104(12): p. 3956-3990.
Google Scholar
21
-
Easterwood, J., A. Seth, and R. Singer, Limits on Managerial Discretion in Management Buyouts: The Effectiveness of Institutional, Market and Legal Mechanisms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 1997. 18(7/8): p. 645-666.
Google Scholar
22
-
Fox, I. and A. Marcus, The Causes and Consequences of Leveraged Management Buyouts. The Academy of Management Review, 1992. 17(1): p. 62-85.
Google Scholar
23
-
Link, A., C. Ruhm, and D. Siegel, Private Equity and the Innovation Strategies of Entrepreneurial Firms: Empirical Evidence from the Small Business Innovation Research Program. 2012, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Google Scholar
24
-
Lerner, J., M. Sorensen, and P. Strömberg, Private Equity and Long‐Run Investment: The Case of Innovation. Journal of Finance, 2011. 66(2): p. 445-477.
Google Scholar
25
-
Wright, M., R.E. Hoskisson, and L.W. Busenitz, Firm rebirth: Buyouts as facilitators of strategic growth and entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Executive, 2001. 15(1): p. 111-125.
Google Scholar
26
-
Zahra, S.A., Goverance, Ownership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities. The Academy of Management Journal, 1996. 39(6): p. 1713-1735.
Google Scholar
27
-
Ferreira, D., et al., Incentives to Innovate and the Decision to Go Public or Private. The Review of Financial Studies, 2014. 27(1): p. 256-300.
Google Scholar
28
-
Gompers, P., S.N. Kaplan, and V. Mukharlyamov, What do private equity firms say they do? Journal of Financial Economics, 2016. 121(3): p. 449-476.
Google Scholar
29
-
Bertoni, F., Innovation in Private Equity Leveraged Buyouts. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017.
Google Scholar
30
-
Humphrey, J.N.Y., T. Matthias, and D. Christoph, The Effect of Private Equity Ownership on Management Practices: A Research Agenda. Competition & Change, 2014. 18(2): p. 164-179.
Google Scholar
31
-
LePine, J.A. and A. Wilcox-King, Developing novel theoretical insight from reviews of existing theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 2010. 35(4): p. 506-509.
Google Scholar
32
-
Wright, M., et al., Entrepreneurial Growth through Privatization: The Upside of Management Buyouts. The Academy of Management Review, 2000. 25(3): p. 591-601.
Google Scholar
33
-
Le Nadant, A.-L. and F. Perdreau. Do Private Equity Firms Foster Innovation? Evidence from French LBOs. in International Conference on Economics and Management of Networks (EMNet). 2011. Limassol, Cyprus.
Google Scholar
34
-
Kaufman, A. and E.J. Englander, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and the Restructuring of American Capitalism. The Business History Review, 1993. 67(1): p. 52-97.
Google Scholar
35
-
36. Hoskisson, R.E., M.A. Hitt, and W.L.H. Charles, Managerial Risk Taking in Diversified Firms: An Evolutionary Perspective. Organization Science, 1991. 2(3): p. 296-314.
Google Scholar
36
-
Kaplan, S.N. and A. Schoar, Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence, and Capital Flows. The Journal of Finance, 2005. 60(4): p. 1791-1823.
Google Scholar
37
-
Bharath, S., A. Dittmar, and J. Sivadasan, Do Going-Private Transactions Affect Plant Efficiency and Investment? The Review of Financial Studies, 2014. 27(7): p. 1929-1976.
Google Scholar
38
-
Marginson, D. and L. McAulay, Exploring the Debate on Short-Termism: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 2008. 29(3): p. 273-292.
Google Scholar
39
-
Zahra, S.A., Corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: The case of management leveraged buyouts. Journal of business venturing, 1995. 10(3): p. 225-247.
Google Scholar
40
-
Newbould, G.D., R.E. Chatfield, and R.F. Anderson, Leveraged Buyouts and Tax Incentives. Financial Management, 1992. 21(1): p. 50-57.
Google Scholar
41
-
Axelson, U., et al., Why Are Buyouts Levered? The Financial Structure of Private Equity Funds. The Journal of Finance, 2009. 64(4): p. 1549-1582.
Google Scholar
42
-
Singh, H., Management Buyouts: Distinguishing Characteristics and Operating Changes Prior to Public Offering. Strategic Management Journal, 1990. 11: p. 111-129.
Google Scholar
43
-
Evans, J., M. Poa, and S. Rath, The financial and governance characteristics of australian companies going private. International Journal of Business Studies, 2005. 13(1): p. 1-24.
Google Scholar
44
-
Chevalier, J.A., Do LBO Supermarkets Charge More? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of LBOs on Supermarket Pricing. The Journal of Finance, 1995. 50(4): p. 1095-1112.
Google Scholar
45
-
Lowenstein, L., Management Buyouts. Columbia Law Review, 1985. 85(4): p. 730-784.
Google Scholar
46
-
Lichtenberg, F.R. and D. Siegel, The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 1990. 27(1): p. 165-194.
Google Scholar
47
-
Li, D., Financial Constraints, R&D Investment, and Stock Returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 2011. 24(9): p. 2974-3007.
Google Scholar
48
-
Bruton, G.D. and E. Scifres, Leveraged Buyouts: Their Impact on R&D Spending. MIR: Management International Review, 1992. 32(1): p. 7-21.
Google Scholar
49
-
Ho, Y., et al., Size, Leverage, Concentration, and R&D Investment in Generating Growth Opportunities. The Journal of Business, 2006. 79(2): p. 851-876.
Google Scholar
50
-
Kothari, S.P., T.E. Laguerre, and A.J. Leone, Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Capital Expenditures versus R&D Outlays. Review of Accounting Studies, 2002. 7(4): p. 355-382.
Google Scholar
51
-
Hall, B.H., E. Berndt, and R.C. Levin, The Impact of Corporate Restructuring on Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1990. 1990: p. 85-135.
Google Scholar
52
-
Harrison, J.S., LBOs Slash R&D: So What? The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 1994. 8(2): p. 83-84.
Google Scholar
53
-
Latham, S. and M. Braun, Does Short-termism Influence Firm Innovation? An Examination of S&P 500 Firms, 1990-2003. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2010. 22(3): p. 368-382.
Google Scholar
54
-
Long, W.F. and D.J. Ravenscraft, LBOs, Debt and R&D Intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 1993. 14: p. 119-135.
Google Scholar
55
-
Ughetto, E., Assessing the contribution to innovation of private equity investors: A study on European buyouts. Research Policy, 2010. 39(1): p. 126-140.
Google Scholar
56
-
Datta, S., M. Gruskin, and M. Iskandar-Datta, Lifting the Veil on Reverse Leveraged Buyouts: What Happens During the Private Period? Financial Management, 2013. 42(4): p. 815-842.
Google Scholar
57
-
Hitt, M.A., et al., Effects of Acquisitions on R&D Inputs and Outputs. The Academy of Management Journal, 1991. 34(3): p. 693-706.
Google Scholar
58
-
Nicolas, B., et al., The effects of private equity and buy-outs on HRM in the UK and the Netherlands. Human Relations, 2008. 61(10): p. 1399-1433.
Google Scholar
59