##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The Manaus Industrial Pole (PIM), located in a tax incentive area, is responsible for relevant economic growth and conservation of the Amazon Rainforest. With the advent of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) bringing new technological approaches, management, and business models and, mainly, insertion in global productive chains, it is necessary to verify the maturity and readiness of the PIM companies regarding this new environment. This article aims to verify the logistical interoperability as a boosting tool of I4.0, through applied and exploratory research, based on the case study of a motorcycle manufacturer, using a logistical interoperability measurement model based on structural equations. As a result, an overall evaluation coefficient value of 4.65 to a maximum of 5.00 was found, and the points for improvement are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abdel-Basset, M.; Manogaran, G.; Mohamed, M. (2018). Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on supply chain: A framework for building smart, secure and efficient systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 86.
     Google Scholar
  2. Abraciclo. Resumo Motocicletas. Avaiable in < https://www.abraciclo.com.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2020-12-Resumo-MOTOCICLETAS.pdf>. Access: Apr. 05, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  3. Anand, Nilesh et al. (2012). GenClon: An ontology for city logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(15).
     Google Scholar
  4. Alioto, M. (2017). Enabling the Internet of Things: From Integrated Circuits to Integrated Systems. Springer International Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  5. Böhmer, Martin; Schmidt, Michael; Weissenberg, Norbert. (2015). Seamless interoperability in logistics: narrowing the business-IT gap by logistics business objects. In: Cloud Computing for Logistics. Springer, Cham, p. 77-117.
     Google Scholar
  6. Brasil, Decreto-Lei 288, de 28 de fevereiro de 1967. Altera as disposições da Lei número 3.173 de 6 de junho de 1957 e regula a Zona Franca de Manaus. Avaiable in < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Decreto-Lei/Del0288.htm>. Access: Apr., 05, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  7. Brasil, Lei nº 8.387, de 30 de dezembro de 1991. Dá nova redação ao § 1° do art. 3° aos arts. 7° e 9° do Decreto-Lei n° 288, de 28 de fevereiro de 1967, ao caput do art. 37 do Decreto-Lei n° 1.455, de 7 de abril de 1976 e ao art. 10 da Lei n° 2.145, de 29 de dezembro de 1953, e dá outras providências. Avaiable in < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8387.htm>. Access: Apr., 05, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  8. Brasil, Portaria Interministerial 32, de 15 de julho de 2019. Disciplina o funcionamento do Grupo Técnico Interministerial de Análise de Processos Produtivos Básicos e os procedimentos de análise e aprovação de Processo Produtivo Básico. Avaiable in < https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/portaria-interministerial-n-32-de-15-de-julho-de-2019-198611003>. Access: Sept. 14, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  9. Chalmeta, Ricardo; PAZOS, Verónica. A step-by-step methodology for enterprise interoperability projects. Enterprise Information Systems, v. 9, n. 4, p. 436-464, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  10. Christopher, M. (1999a). Logística e gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos: estratégias para a redução de custos e melhoria dos serviços. Pioneira, ISBN 8522100624.
     Google Scholar
  11. Confederação Nacional da Industria – CNI. (2016). Desafios para indústria 4.0 no Brasil: report. Brasília: CNI.
     Google Scholar
  12. Creswell, John W.; Creswell, J. David. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE. ISBN 978-1-5063-8670-6.
     Google Scholar
  13. CSCMP, C. L. M. M. P. Terms and Glossary, Updated: August 2013. PROFISSIONALS, C.-C.L.M.M. Avaiable in <https://cscmp.org/CSCMP/Academia/SCM_Definitions_and_Glossary_of_Terms/CSCMP/Educate/SCM_Definitions_and_Glossary_of_Terms.aspx>. Access: Apr. 05, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  14. Di Martino, B.; LI, K. C.; Yang, L. T.; Esposito, A. (2017). Internet of Everything: Algorithms, Methodologies, Technologies and Perspectives. Springer Singapore.
     Google Scholar
  15. Dobos, P.; Tamás, P.; Illés, B. (2016). Decision method for optimal selection of warehouse material handling strategies by production 204 companies. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing. p.012100.
     Google Scholar
  16. Douglas, M. (2016). They might be giants: e-commerce and logistics technology help small and midsize businesses compete like the big guys. Inbound Logistics. ISSN 0888-8493.
     Google Scholar
  17. Forkel, Eric et al. (2018). Smart Interoperable Logistics and Additive Manufacturing-Modern Technologies for Digital Transformation and Industry 4.0. SAE Technical Paper.
     Google Scholar
  18. Fórum Econômico Mundial, Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018. Avaiable in < http://www3.weforum.org/docs/FOP_Readiness_Report_2018.pdf.> Access: Apr. 05, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  19. Gil, Antonio C. (1991). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas.
     Google Scholar
  20. Holland, Márcio. (Coordenador) et al. (2019). Zona Franca De Manaus: Impactos, Efetividade E Oportunidades, FGV/EESP.
     Google Scholar
  21. IOL Platform©. Version 2.1. Manaus: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2017. Avaiable in < https://www.pimm40.com/iol/Pages/Paginas/StartPage.aspx?&url=RXJyb3JQYWdlLmFzcHg==>. Access: Apr. 14, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  22. Mangan, J.; Lalwani, C.; Lalwani, C. L. (2016). Global logistics and supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 1119117828.
     Google Scholar
  23. Novaes, A. (2016). Logística e gerenciamento da cadeia de distribuição. Elsevier Brasil. ISBN 8535279830.
     Google Scholar
  24. Pan, Shenle et al. (2021). Digital interoperability in logistics and supply chain management: state-of-the-art and research avenues towards Physical Internet. Computers in Industry, 128, 103435.
     Google Scholar
  25. Pedersen, Jan Tore. (2012). One common framework for information and communication systems in transport and logistics: Facilitating interoperability. In: Sustainable transport. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 165-196.
     Google Scholar
  26. Rivas, Alexandre; MOTA, José Aroudo. (2009). Instrumentos econômicos para a proteção da Amazônia: a experiência do Polo Industrial de Manaus. Editora CRV.
     Google Scholar
  27. Santiago, Sandro Breval et al. (2013). Interoperabilidade Logística (IOL), ENEGEP.
     Google Scholar
  28. Santiago, Sandro Breval et al. Medição da interoperabilidade logística com uso do modelo de equações estruturais. 2017.
     Google Scholar
  29. Schönsleben, P. (2016). Integral logistics management: operations and supply chain management within and across companies. CRC Press. ISBN 1498750540.
     Google Scholar
  30. Silva, E. L. D.; Menezes, E. M. (2001). Metodologia da pesquisa e elaboração de dissertação.
     Google Scholar
  31. Silva, Michele Lins Aracaty et al. Análise do modelo Zona Franca de Manaus com base nas teorias de desenvolvimento regional. X Seminário Internacional sobre Desenvolvimento Regional, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  32. Suframa. Histórico. Avaiable in <https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/zfm/o-que-e-o-projeto-zfm> Access: Apr., 05, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  33. Suframa. Indicadores de Desempenho do Polo Industrial de Manaus 2015-2020. Avaiable in < https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/publicacoes/indicadores/caderno_indicadores_janeiro_dezembro_2020__gerado_em_26-02-2021_.pdf> Access: Apr., 05, 2021.
     Google Scholar
  34. Westerheim, Hans; Baalsrud Hauge, Jannicke. (2015). Interoperability in supply chain and logistics: What can the Common Framework offer? – A scientific evaluation. International Journal of Advanced Logistics, 4, n. 1, 9-16.
     Google Scholar
  35. XU, L. D.; Xu, E. L.; LI, L. J. I. J. O. P. R. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 2941-2962.
     Google Scholar
  36. Wu, Lifang; YUE, Xiaohang; JIN, Alan; YEN, David C. (2016). Smart supply chain management: a review and implications for future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(2).
     Google Scholar
  37. Yin, Robert K. (2015). Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e métodos. Bookman editora.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)