Debt-Equity Ratio, CEO Power and Financial Performance of Listed Companies at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Firm financial performance is essential for corporate survival and prosperity. Financial leverage may be used to enhance corporate financial performance, but it can also occasion financial distress and bankruptcy if not carefully managed. At the Nairobi Securities Exchange, a number of firms face poor financial performance, financial distress, and weak corporate governance, commonly associated with excessive leverage and bankruptcy. Recent corporate finance research shows increasing importance of variables, omitted in prior corporate finance studies, with more practical significance to practicing managers such as debt slack and corporate governance. The purpose of this study was to determine the moderating effect of Chief Executive Officer Power on the relationship between financial leverage and financial performance of listed companies at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. The specific objective was to determine the conditional effect of Chief Executive Officer Power on the relationship between Debt-Equity ratio and firm financial performance. The study was grounded on dynamic trade-off, pecking order, agency, and upper echelon theories. Positivist research paradigm with a descriptive research design using a linear regression model on Panel data obtained from a survey of 38 listed companies at Nairobi Securities Exchange over the period 2010 to 2019 was used. The data was mined from financial statements filed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Controlling for Firm size, Sales growth and operational efficiency, the study found Chief Executive Officer Power to significantly moderate the relationship between Debt/Equity ratio and Return on Equity (∆R2 = +0.1314;ꞵ = 0.1019455, p=0.000), with scope for lower levels enhancing Return on Equity while higher levels dampening. The study recommended a low Chief Executive Officer Power configuration mandate. The study contributes to theory development by establishing executive power contingency to theories relating financial leverage to firm financial performance; to knowledge by developing a tool for measurement of Executive power; and to policy by providing empirical evidence for regulation of executive power. The study scope was limited to structural and shared ownership sources of Chief Executive Officer Power and recommends further research incorporating personal sources of power.
Downloads
References
-
Ab Wahab, S. N. A., & Ramli, N. A. (2014). The determinants of capital structure: an empirical investigation of Malaysian listed government linked companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(4), 930-945.
Google Scholar
1
-
Abubakar, A. (2015). Relationship between financial leverage and financial performance of deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(10), 759-778.
Google Scholar
2
-
Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. The Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1403-1432.
Google Scholar
3
-
Agca, S., & Mozumdar, A. (2004). Firm size, debt capacity, and corporate financing choices. Debt Capacity, and Corporate Financing Choices (December 2004).
Google Scholar
4
-
Ahmad, N., Salman, A., & Shamsi, A. (2015). Impact of financial leverage on firms’ profitability: An investigation from cement sector of Pakistan. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(7), 2222-1697.
Google Scholar
5
-
Aliyu, A. A., Bello, M. U., Kasim, R., & Martin, D. (2014). Positivist and non-positivist paradigm in social science research: Conflicting paradigms or perfect partners. J. Mgmt. & Sustainability, 4, 79.
Google Scholar
6
-
Amedu, S. (2016). Impact of CEO power on company performance. University of Reading.
Google Scholar
7
-
Ang, J. S., Daher, M. M., & Ismail, A. K. (2019). How do firms value debt capacity? Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 95-107.
Google Scholar
8
-
Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433-448.
Google Scholar
9
-
Baik, B., Chae, J., Choi, S., & Farber, D. B. (2013). Changes in operational efficiency and firm performance: A frontier analysis approach. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(3), 996-1026.
Google Scholar
10
-
Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E. W., & Davis, P. E. (2016). Agency theory: background and epistemology. Journal of Management History.
Google Scholar
11
-
Bonazzi, G., & Iotti, M. (2014). Interest coverage ratios (ICRs) and financial sustainability: Application to firms with bovine dairy livestock. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 9(4), 482.
Google Scholar
12
-
Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc‐Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital structures in developing countries. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 87-130.
Google Scholar
13
-
Byoun, S. (2008). How and when do firms adjust their capital structures toward targets? The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 3069-3096.
Google Scholar
14
-
Cheikh, S. B., & de Gabès, I. (2014). Determinants of CEO power and characteristics of managerial profile: Implications for risk-taking in listed Tunisian firms. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(6).
Google Scholar
15
-
Combs, J. G., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Perryman, A. A., & Donahue, M. S. (2007). The moderating effect of CEO power on the board composition–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1299-1323.
Google Scholar
16
-
Daily, C. M., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23(2), 97-117.
Google Scholar
17
-
Dey, R., Hossain, S., & Rahman, R. (2018). Effect of corporate financial leverage on financial performance: A study on publicly traded manufacturing companies in Bangladesh. Asian Social Science, 14(12).
Google Scholar
18
-
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Google Scholar
19
-
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505-538.
Google Scholar
20
-
Fischer, E. O., Heinkel, R., & Zechner, J. (1989). Dynamic capital structure choice: Theory and tests. The Journal of Finance, 44(1), 19-40.
Google Scholar
21
-
Fosu, S. (2013). Capital structure, product market competition and firm performance: Evidence from South Africa. The quarterly review of economics and finance, 53(2), 140-151.
Google Scholar
22
-
Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2008). Trade-off and pecking order theories of debt Handbook of empirical corporate finance (pp. 135-202): Elsevier.
Google Scholar
23
-
Gormley, T. A., & Matsa, D. A. (2016). Playing it safe? Managerial preferences, risk, and agency conflicts. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 431-455.
Google Scholar
24
-
Graham, J. R., Kim, H., & Leary, M. T. (2019). CEO-board dynamics. Available at SSRN 2938120.
Google Scholar
25
-
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.
Google Scholar
26
-
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Google Scholar
27
-
Kayo, E. K., & Kimura, H. (2011). Hierarchical determinants of capital structure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(2), 358-371.
Google Scholar
28
-
Kim, E. H., & Lu, Y. (2011). CEO ownership, external governance, and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(2), 272-292.
Google Scholar
29
-
Kim, S. (2003). Research paradigms in organizational learning and performance: Competing modes of inquiry. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21(1), 9.
Google Scholar
30
-
Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. (2006). Proposal and thesis writing: An introduction. Nairobi: Paulines Publications Africa, 5(1), 814-830.
Google Scholar
31
-
Lazăr, S. (2016). Determinants of firm performance: evidence from Romanian listed companies. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 9(1), 53-69.
Google Scholar
32
-
Lemmon, M. L., & Zender, J. F. (2010). Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(5), 1161-1187.
Google Scholar
33
-
Leon, S. J. (2013). The impact of Capital Structure on Financial Performance of the listed manufacturing firms in Sri Lanka. Global. Journal of Commerce & Management Perspective, 2(5), 56-62.
Google Scholar
34
-
Maher, M., & Andersson, T. (2000). Corporate governance: effects on firm performance and economic growth. Available at SSRN 218490.
Google Scholar
35
-
Martis, R. N. (2013). Capital Structure and Firm’s Financial Performance, An Empirical Analysis of the S&P500. Master. University Van Tilburg.
Google Scholar
36
-
McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1995). Equity ownership and the two faces of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 39(1), 131-157.
Google Scholar
37
-
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling.
Google Scholar
38
-
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. The American economic review, 53(3), 433-443.
Google Scholar
39
-
Muhammad, H., Shah, B., & ul Islam, Z. (2014). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Pakistan. 산경연구논집 (IJIDB), 5(2), 13-20.
Google Scholar
40
-
Mukras, M. S. (2015). Financial leverage and performance of listed firms in a frontier market: Panel evidence from Kenya.
Google Scholar
41
-
Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147-175.
Google Scholar
42
-
Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574-592.
Google Scholar
43
-
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
Google Scholar
44
-
Naz, F., Ijaz, F., & Naqvi, F. (2016). Financial performance of firms: Evidence from Pakistan cement industry. Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(01), 81-94.
Google Scholar
45
-
Ndolo, P. S. (2015). The relationship between operational efficiency and financial performance of firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Unpublished MBA project. Nairobi: University of Nairobi.
Google Scholar
46
-
Odalo, S. K., Achoki, G., & Njuguna, A. (2016). Relating Company Size and Financial Performance in Agricultural Firms Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(9), 34-40.
Google Scholar
47
-
Odalo, S. K., Njuguna, A. G., & Achoki, G. (2016). Relating Sales Growth and Financial Performance in Agricultural Firms Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya.
Google Scholar
48
-
Omollo, B. A., Muturi, W. M., & Wanjare, J. Effect of Debt Financing Options on Financial Performance of Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya.
Google Scholar
49
-
Omollo, B. A., Muturi, W. M., & Wanjare, J. (2018). Effect of Debt Financing Options on Financial Performance of Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(10), 150-164.
Google Scholar
50
-
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Google Scholar
51
-
Padrón, Y. G., Apolinario, R. M. C., Santana, O. M., Martel, M. C. V., & Sales, L. J. (2005). Determinant factors of leverage: An empirical analysis of Spanish corporations. The Journal of Risk Finance Incorporating Balance Sheet, 6(1), 60-68.
Google Scholar
52
-
Roberts, M. R., & Leary, M. T. (2004). Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structures? Paper presented at the Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings.
Google Scholar
53
-
Salamba, J. J. (2015). Impact of capital structure on performance of Smes in Tanzania: A case of smes in Dodoma municipality. Mzumbe University.
Google Scholar
54
-
Škare, M., & Golja, T. (2014). The impact of government CSR supporting policies on economic growth. Journal of policy modeling, 36(3), 562-577.
Google Scholar
55
-
Škare, M., & Hasić, T. (2016). Corporate governance, firm performance, and economic growth–theoretical analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 35-51.
Google Scholar
56
-
Stiglitz, J. E. (1973). Taxation, corporate financial policy, and the cost of capital. Journal of Public Economics, 2(1), 1-34.
Google Scholar
57
-
Tien, C., Chen, C.-N., & Chuang, C.-M. (2013). A study of CEO power, pay structure, and firm performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(4), 424-453.
Google Scholar
58
-
Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1-19.
Google Scholar
59
-
Van Essen, M., Otten, J., & Carberry, E. J. (2015). Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41(1), 164-202.
Google Scholar
60
-
Wanjere, M., Ogutu, M., Kinoti, M., & Iraki, X. (2021). Foreign Direct Investment and Local Firm’s Performance. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(6), 216-222.
Google Scholar
61
-
Wardlow, G. (1989). Alternative modes of inquiry for agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 30(4), 2-7.
Google Scholar
62
-
Yapa Abeywardhana, D. (2016). Impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from manufacturing sector SMEs in UK. Impact of Capital Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector SMEs in UK (July 31, 2016).
Google Scholar
63