Analysis of Factors that Influence the Continuous Intention to Use the Financial Technology Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending Services During the Covid-19 Pandemic
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF
Submitted Apr 29, 2022
Published Jun 13, 2022
Published Jun 13, 2022
DOI
Abstract viewed = 258 times
Issue
Section
Articles
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The purpose of this study is to determine the factors that influence the continuous intention to use Financial Technology Peer to Peer (P2P) lending services during the Covid-19 pandemic. P2P lending is the provision of financial services to bring together loan recipients and lenders in order to enter into lending and borrowing agreements directly through an electronic system using the internet network in the rupiah currency. The existence of financial technology today will encourage the growth of a cashless society. Banknotes or physical cash are created by utilizing resources in the environment and also the impact of creating banknotes is high and is a risk to the environment. The cashless system is expected to help minimize the environmental impacts of banknote printing waste that can cause climate change. This study is quantitative research using an online survey method. We screened the questionnaire that had been filled by 67 respondents and we choose 55 respondents who met the requirements. We analyzed the data with a structural equation model (SEM) to test the hypotheses, including the relationships of all latent variables. In this study, we use 6 variables perceived usefulness, personal innovativeness, perceived ease of use, social influence, perceived security, and continuous intention to use. The results reveal that perceived ease of use and perceived security have significant influence on continuous intention to use P2P lending services. In addition, personal innovativeness, perceived usefulness and social influence have no significant influence on continuous intention to use P2P lending services.
Keywords: P2P Lending, perceived ease of use, perceived security, perceived usefulness, social influence
References
Adilah, I. (2020, June 25). Langkah Perbankan Indonesia untuk Menjawab Tantangan Keberadaan Fintech. https://kumparan.com/imas-adilah/langkah-perbankan-indonesia-untuk-menjawab-tantangan-keberadaan-fintech-1tgBgf2ubzV/1.
Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204.
Alghamdi, A., Elbeltagi, I., Elsetouhi, A., & Haddoud, M. (2018). Antecedents of continuance intention of using Internet banking in Saudi Arabia: A new integrated model. Strategic Change, 27(3), 231–243. doi: 10.1002/jsc.2197.
Al-Rahmi, W. M. et al. (2019). Integrating Technology Acceptance Model with Innovation Diffusion Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Students’ Intention to Use E-Learning Systems. IEEE Access, vol. 7, 26797–26809. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368.
Bjoern, B., & Juengerkes, E. (2016). FinTechs and Banks – Collaboration is Key Collaborating Makes Sense for Both FinTechs and Banks Different Banks , Different Benefits (S. C. and J. Barberis (ed.)).
Cermati. (2019, August 5). Cara Lapor Polisi bila Diteror dan Diancam Pinjaman Online. https://www.cermati.com/artikel/cara-lapor-polisi-bila-diteror-dan-diancam-pinjaman-online.
Contreras Pinochet, L. H., Diogo, G. T., Lopes, E. L., Herrero, E., & Bueno, R. L. P. (2019). Propensity of contracting loans services from FinTech’s in Brazil. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(5), 1190–1214. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2018-0174.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 19-340. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.33621.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science., 35(8), 982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
Duane, A., O’Reilly, P., & Andreev, P. (2014). Realising M-Payments: Modelling consumers’ willingness to M-pay using Smart Phones. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33(4), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.745608.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Howcroft, B., Hamilton, R., & Hewer, P. (2002). Consumer attitude and the usage and adoption of home-based banking in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(3), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320210424205.
Kato, A., Takada, M., & Hashimoto, H. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0179-z.
Kesharwani, A., & Tripathy, T. (2012). Dimensionality of Perceived Risk and Its Impact on Internet Banking Adoption: An Empirical Investigation. Services Marketing Quarterly, 33(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2012.662461.
Kröner, M. (2017). Best of both worlds: Banken vs. FinTech? Springer Gabler, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14187-5.
Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003.
Li, T. & Chen, Y. (2019). Will virtual reality be a double-edged sword? Exploring the moderation effects of the expected enjoyment of a destination on travel intention. Journal of Destination Marketing Management, 12(101), 15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.02.003.
López-Nicolás, C., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2008). An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information and Management, 45(6), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.05.001.
Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003.
PameloPay.(2020, September8). Why going cashless is better for the environment. https://www.pomelopay.com/blog/cashless-better-for-environment.
Patel, K. J., & Patel, H. J. (2018). Adoption of internet banking services in Gujarat: An extension of TAM with perceived security and social influence. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2016-0104.
Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542652.
Polatoglu, V. N., & Ekin, S. (2003). An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 123–145. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/43542.
Putro, A., & Hendratmoko. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Individu Dalam Menggunakan Peer To Peer Lending Dan Equity Crowd Funding Di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen, 9(1). Indonesia.
Ren, C., Deng, Z., Hong, Z., & Zhang, W.(2019). Health information in the digital age: an empirical study of the perceived benefits and costs of seeking and using health information from online sources. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 36(2), 153–167. doi: 10.1111/hir.12250.
Salisbury, W. D., Pearson, R. A., Pearson, A. W., & Miller, D. W. (2001). Perceived security and World Wide Web purchase intention. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(4), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570110390071.
Sathye, M. (1999). Adoption of Internet banking by Australian consumers: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(7), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652329910305689.
Shih, Y. Y., & Fang, K. (2004). The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542643.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical Acceptance Extension Model:Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Viehland, D., Siu, R., & Leong, Y. (2010). Consumer Willingness to Use and Pay for Mobile Payment Services. International Journal of Principles and Appliations of Information Sciences and Technology, 3(1), 35–45.
Wang, L. Y. K., Lew, S. L., Lau, S. H., & Leow, M. C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon, 5(6), p. e01788. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788.
Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H., & Tang, T. I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310500192.
Yuniarti, V. (2019). Faktor – Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Minat Penggunaan Financial Technology Peer To Peer Lending. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya, 8(1). Indonesia.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
Novitasari, N., & Suryandari, R. T. (2022). Analysis of Factors that Influence the Continuous Intention to Use the Financial Technology Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending Services During the Covid-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(3), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1424
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
