Are We All in This Together? CSR as a Marketing Strategy in Times of COVID-19 Crisis



Abstract Views
452

Downloads
436

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 5, 2022
Published Aug 16, 2022
10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.4.1555

Abstract viewed = 452 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

How can we help? This study is to propose how companies can provide help through corporate social responsibility (CSR) marketing strategies in the time of COVID-19 crisis. More specifically, the purpose of this research is to explore the relative effects of three common types of CSR initiatives (philanthropic donation, purchase-triggered donation, and sponsorship-linked marketing) on consumer attitudes (CSR image and consumer identification) and responses (e-WOM and purchase intention) in different stages of COVID-19 pandemic. This research also proposes the moderating effects of COVID-19 related cause type (health and human service), contribution type (money and in-kind donations), and perceived severity of COVID-19 on the relative effectiveness of each CSR initiative. In doing so, this research implies possible practical directions for companies to determine their CSR marketing strategy as well as fills the research gap, especially in the time of COVID-19 or environmental turbulences.

Keywords: corporate social responsibility, consumer behavior, perceived severity of COVID-19

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(January), 68-84.
     Google Scholar
  2. Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2015). Doing well by doing good: The benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412-1425.
     Google Scholar
  3. Collins, M. (1994). Global corporate philanthropy and relationship marketing. European Management Journal, 12(2), 226-234.
     Google Scholar
  4. Cornwell, B. T., & Coote, L. V. (2005). Corporate sponsorship of a cause: The role of identification in purchase intent. Journal of Business Research, 58, 268-276.
     Google Scholar
  5. Currás-Pérez, R., Bigne, E., & Alvarado-Herrera, A. (2009). The role of self-definitional principles in consumer identification with a socially responsible company. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 547-564.
     Google Scholar
  6. D’Astous, A., & Bitz, P. (1995). Consumer evaluations of sponsorship programs. European Journal of Marketing, 29(12), 6-22.
     Google Scholar
  7. Ellen, P., Mohr, L., & Webb, D. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing, 76, 393-406.
     Google Scholar
  8. Euronews (2020). COVID-19: World economy in 2020 to suffer worst year since 1930s Great Depression, says IMF, https://www.euronews.com/2020/04/14/watch-live-international-monetary-fund-gives-world-economic-outlook-briefing-on-covid-19
     Google Scholar
  9. Gwinner, K., & Bennett, G. (2008). The impact of brand cohesiveness and sport identification on brand fit in a sponsorship context. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 410-426.
     Google Scholar
  10. Gwinner, K., & Swanson, S. (2003). A model of fan identification: Antecedents and sponsorship outcomes. Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 275-294.
     Google Scholar
  11. Hamby, A. (2016). One for me, one for you: Cause-related marketing with buy-one give one promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 33(9), 692-703.
     Google Scholar
  12. He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176-182.
     Google Scholar
  13. Hilderbrand, D., Demotta, Yo., Sen, S., & Valenzuela A. (2017). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) contribution type. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 738-758.
     Google Scholar
  14. Hultgren, K. (2020), Cause marketing in the time of COVID-19, https://www.chiefmarketer.com/cause-marketing-in-the-era-of-covid-19/
     Google Scholar
  15. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education & Behavior, 11(1), 1-47.
     Google Scholar
  16. Jeong, H. J., Paek, H., & Lee, M (2013). Corporate social responsibility effects on social network sites. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1889-1895.
     Google Scholar
  17. Keller, K. L. (2019). Consumer research insights on brands and branding: A JCR curation. Journal of Consumer Research, 46, 995-1001.
     Google Scholar
  18. Lachowetz, T., Clark, J. M., Irwin, R., & Cornwell, T. B. (2002). Cause-related sponsorship: A survey of consumer/spectator beliefs, attitudes, behavioral intentions, and corporate image impressions. American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings, 13, 14-20.
     Google Scholar
  19. Lafferty, B. A., & Edmondson, D. R. (2014). A note on the role of cause type in cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1455-1460.
     Google Scholar
  20. Laroche, M., & Sadokierski, R. W. (1994). Role of confidence in a multi-brand model of intentions for a high involvement service. Journal of Business Research, 29(1), 1-12.
     Google Scholar
  21. Langan, R., & Kumar, A. (2019). Time versus money: The role of perceived effort in consumers' evaluation of corporate giving. Journal of Business Research, 99, 295-305.
     Google Scholar
  22. Lee, J. Y., & Johnson, K. (2019). Caused-related marketing strategy types: Assessing their relative effectiveness. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 23(2), 239-256.
     Google Scholar
  23. Lii, Y. S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69-81.
     Google Scholar
  24. Lii, Y. S., Wu, K. W., & Ding, M. C. (2013). Doing good does good? Sustainable marketing of CSR and consumer evaluations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 15-28.
     Google Scholar
  25. Meenaghan, T. (2001). Understanding sponsorship effects. Psychology & Marketing, 18(2), 95-122.
     Google Scholar
  26. Mohr, L., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72.
     Google Scholar
  27. Mohr, L., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121-147.
     Google Scholar
  28. Polonsky, M. J., & Speed, R. (2001). Linking sponsorship and cause related marketing: Complementary and conflicts. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 1361-1389.
     Google Scholar
  29. Rifon, N. J., Choi, S. M., Trimble, C. S., & Hairong, L. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 29-42.
     Google Scholar
  30. Ryan L., & Kumar, A. (2019). Time versus money: The role of perceived effort in consumers' evaluation of corporate giving. Journal of Business Research, 99, 295-305.
     Google Scholar
  31. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May), 225-243.
     Google Scholar
  32. Shaw, B., & Post, F. R. (1993). A moral basis for corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 745-751.
     Google Scholar
  33. Smith, W. (2020). 4 Brands embracing cause marketing in the COVID-19 Era. https://www.globalgiving.org/learn/covid-19-cause-marketing
     Google Scholar
  34. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Inter-group Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
     Google Scholar
  35. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 20(5), 454-63.
     Google Scholar
  36. Yoon, Y., & Gurhan-Canli, Z. (2003). The effect of partnering with good causes on corporate and organization image. Advances in Consumer Research, 30, 322-324.
     Google Scholar
  37. Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Bozok, B. (2006). Drawing inferences about others on the basis of corporate associations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 167-173.
     Google Scholar
  38. Zeno (2020), https://www.zenogroup.com/insights/2020-zeno-strength-purpose
     Google Scholar
  39. Zhu, L., He, Y., Chen, Q., & Hu, M. (2017). It's the thought that counts: The effects of construal level priming and donation proximity on consumer response to donation framing. Journal of Business Research, 76, 44-51.
     Google Scholar