Construction Process Business Model Strategy to Fulfil the Working Contract at PT Uniteda Arkato



Abstract Views
211

Downloads
287

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 6, 2022
Published Jul 31, 2022
10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.4.1559

Abstract viewed = 211 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study aims to (1) analyze the appropriate business model at PT. Uniteda Arkato, (2) To analyze how to increase the production of stockpiling dams to achieve the target of the work contract, (3) To analyze to determine rational production capability standards. The population in this study is the contract PT. Uniteda Arkato, totaling four contracts. Analytical method used in this research is the Canvas Business Model, Critical Path Method (CPM), and Line Balancing. The results of the study found that with the appropriate canvas business model, companies can compete with companies that have been developing for a long time, Critical Path Method (CPM) can determine critical path that exists during construction process and line balancing analysis makes the production process more efficient. From low production, there is a tendency for delays in the time agreed in the contract. As a result of this delay, the company suffers from possible loss of penalty penalties in addition to the production level that is not achieved will lead to an increase in costs, especially overhead costs.

Keywords: Canvas Business Model, Critical Path Method (CPM) and Line Balancing

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alfriansyah, A. & Arianto, B. (2016). Analisa Peningkatan Kapasitas Produksi Kabel Dengan Metode Line Balancing di PT. XYZ. Program studi teknik industri, Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  2. Amirullah (2015). Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
     Google Scholar
  3. Daman, A. & Nusraningrum, D. (2020). Analysis of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) On Excavator Hitachi EX2500-6. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science,
     Google Scholar
  4. Dio Ariqsyah, Muhammad (2021). Analisis Perencanaan Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi dengan Mengunakan Metode Critical Path Mehod dan Critical Chain Project Management (Studi Kasus: PT Pelindo 1). Depatement Teknik Industri Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
     Google Scholar
  5. Hunger, J.D. dan Wheelen, T.L. (2017). Strategic Management and Bussiness Policy: Toward Global Sustainability (13th Edition). New York: Pearson.
     Google Scholar
  6. Hambali, A. & Andarini, S. (2021). Formulasi Strategi Pengembangan Bisnis Menggunakan Pendekatan Busines Model Canvas (BMC) dan SWOT Analysis dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Saing pada Piring Seng Coffee & Co Tunjangan Surabaya. Jurnal Poli Batam.
     Google Scholar
  7. Heizer, J. and Render, B. (2015), Manajemen Operasi: Manajemen Keberlangsungan dan Rantai Pasokan, edisi 11, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., (2016). Exploring Corporate Strategy. 8 Edition. Boston: Prentice Hall.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kartika, K., Meilina (2021). Analisis Model Bisnis Bank Muamalat Dengan Pendekatan Business Model Canvas. STIES Bekasi.
     Google Scholar
  10. Lumangkun, Larry, D.D. Masie, James, & Mandagie, Yunita (2021). Desain Model Bisnis Transjakarta Mengunakan Business Model Canvas. Jurnal EMBA, 9(3).
     Google Scholar
  11. Mughni, M. & Pusipita Sari, R. (2021). Penerapan Metode Line Balancing Untuk Efisiensi Produksi Pada Bagian Line Face Lathe (Studi Kasus: PT.XYZ). Jurnal Teknovasi, Volume 08, Nomor 02.
     Google Scholar
  12. Nusraningrum, Dewi & Priyono, Joko (2018). Analysis Of Cost Contol, Time and Quality on Constuction Project. Journal of Management and Business, 17(1).
     Google Scholar
  13. Osterwalder, A & Pigneur, Y. (2015). Business Model Generation. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
     Google Scholar
  14. Osterwalder, A dan Pigneur, Y. (2017). Business Model Generation: Pedoman bagi para Visioner, Penggerak Perubahan, dan Pendobrak. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
     Google Scholar
  15. Pracoyo, Tri kunawangsih dan Antyo Pracoyo (2016). Aspek Dasar Ekonomi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
     Google Scholar
  16. Prisilia, H. (2018). Aplikasi metode Lean Project Management dalam Perencanaan Proyek Konstruksi pada Pembangunan Gedung SMU Negeri 1 Giri Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Jurnal Teknik Waktu, 16(1), ISSN:1412-1867.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ridho Hermawan, Sakti (2017). Penerapan Critical Path Method (CPM) Pada Proyek Freeze Dryer di PT. Pharos Indonesia. Universitas Mercubuana, Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  18. Shidiq Ma’mury, Syahriel & Firmanto, Arief (2017). Analisis Kontruksi Proyek Pembangunan PT. Tempoland Cirebon. Jurnal Konstruksi, Cirebon.
     Google Scholar
  19. Sondang P. Siagian. (2016). Sistem Informasi Manajemen, Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  20. Sugiyono (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
     Google Scholar
  21. Sugiyono (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
     Google Scholar
  22. Sugiyono (2019). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
     Google Scholar
  23. Sumarni, Murti & Soeprihanto (2014). Pengantar Bisnis Dasar-Dasar Ekonomi Perusahaan, Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta.
     Google Scholar
  24. Tri Hamidah, Puput (2019). Analisis Supply Chain Management dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Produksi pada PT Londo Sumatra Indonesia, Tbk. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UIN, Sumatera Utara.
     Google Scholar