Risk Management in Oil and Gas Field Development Project with Marginal Resources: A Case in Mature Field in East Kalimantan
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The oil and gas industry and risks are very related to each other. There are several risks known in this industry, from economic risks, political risks, environmental and safety risks, up to geological risks itself. Because oil and gas are a non-renewable source of energy, the more mature an oil and gas field is, the risks for the company to develop a project investment may be lower and higher at the same time. Entering its declining phase, PT MNO who is trusted to operate an ex-termination oil and gas field in East Kalimantan which has been producing for almost 50 years, is required to find a way to survive until end of contract in 2037 by developing the remaining hydrocarbon resources which become more and more marginal. The project development is proposed as a bundling to allow flexibility during execution phase in selecting the well candidates based on recent data acquired from previous wells drilled, hence reducing the risks. Field Development Package (FDP) 2.3 is prepared as part of PT MNO long term plan and commitment after receiving incentive from Government of Indonesia in 2021. According to the Company Guideline, a risk register is mandatory to be developed since beginning of project which covers risks identification, risks analysis, and risks evaluation. The project team is also responsible to define risks treatment to manage the risks borne by the project. This is in line with the requirement for Good Corporate Governance, where risk management is introduced since beginning of the project life-cycle. This study covers the risk assessment on the basis of selected project scope which has been validated technically. The risk assessment will determine the major risks in FDP 2.3 considering available historical data of oil price, drilling cost realization, and facility cost realization. These risks need to be monitored to ensure the FDP 2.3 will create value for the shareholder as per plan or avoid loss at the minimum. The most important risks concluded in this study is oil price lower than economic assumption, production target not achieved, and no fix gas sales contract to absorb production. The company may focus in these risks for the risk management of future project development.
Downloads
References
-
Alex Dolya, K. B. (2020, June 09). A New Reality for Oil and Gas Procurement and Supply Chains. [Internet] BCG. Retrieved from: bcg.com/publications/2020/new-reality-oil-gas-procurement-supply-chain.
Google Scholar
1
-
Armeline Dimier, H. (2014). Re-engaging with Local Stakeholders in the Mature Oil and Gas Mahakam Block on Kalimantan Island, Indonesia. SPE International Conference on HSE (p. 10). California: SPE International.
Google Scholar
2
-
Derek Leith, D. J. (2022, March 18). How oil and gas sector analysts' view Q4 2021 earnings. [Internet] Ernst & Young. Retrieved from: https://www.ey.com/en_id/oil-gas/how-oil-and-gas-sector-analysts-view-q4-2021-earnings
Google Scholar
3
-
Fatema Abdulla AlNoaimi, T. A. (2021). Risk Management Application in an Oil and Gas Company for Projects. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance (IJBEG), 30.
Google Scholar
4
-
Fitriansyah, J. (2014). Risk Management in Oil and Gas Project: A Case Study of new Field Development Project at CNOOC SES Ltd. [Unpublished Thesis] School of Business Management, Bandung Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar
5
-
CEENERGYNEWS. (2022, May 24). GIIGNL 2022 Annual Report. Retrieved September 23, 2022, from https://giignl.org/document/giignl-2022-annual-report/
Google Scholar
6
-
Gitman, L. J. (2015). Principles of Managerial Finance. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar
7
-
ISO 21502, I. O. (2020). ISO 21502:2020 Project, programme and portfolio management – Guidance on project management. Geneva, Switzerland.
Google Scholar
8
-
ISO 31000, I. O. (2018). ISO 31000:2018(en) Risk Management – Guidelines.
Google Scholar
9
-
Jr, G. P. (2021). Risk Management in the Oil and Gas Industry. Cambridge: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
10
-
Khairul Azizan Suda, N. S. (2015). A Review on Risks and Project Risks Management: Oil and Gas Industry. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 938-943.
Google Scholar
11
-
King, D. G. (2020). PNG 301: Introduction to Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering. Retrieved from PennState College of Earth and Mineral Sciences: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/png301/node/508.
Google Scholar
12
-
KPMG. (2021). Risks and Opportunities for Mining. KPMG. Retreived from: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2021/02/risks-and-opportunities-for-mining.html
Google Scholar
13
-
Lee, H. (2021). Risk Management Fundamentals, Theory, and Practice in Asia. Singapore: Springer.
Google Scholar
14
-
Lenkova, V. (2018). Risk management of oil and gas company in terms of strategic transformations. Revista Espacios, 39(06).
Google Scholar
15
-
Mohammad, M. F.& Price, A. D.F. (2004) Challenges on procurement in the oil and gas industry: developing new strategies. Loughborough University. Conference contribution. https://hdl.handle.net/ 2134/23750
Google Scholar
16
-
Sieberer, M., Peisker, J., Clemens, T., Thiele, M. R. (2017). Infill Well Portfolio Management under Uncertainty – Application to the 8 TH Reservoir, Austria. Paper presented at the SPE Europec featured at 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.2118/185803-MS.
Google Scholar
17
-
Middleton, T. C. (2021, Nov 3). Offshore rig utilization continues upward trend, but not all regions seeing bumps in day rates yet. [Internet] Drilling Contractor. Retrieved from: drillingcontractor.org/Offshore-rig-utilization-continues-upward trend-but-not-all-regions-seeing-bumps-in-dayrates-yet-61494.
Google Scholar
18
-
Nova Nevila Rodhi, N. A. (2017). A Review on Risk Factors in the Project of Oil and Gas Industry. IPTEK, The Journal for Technology and Science, 5.
Google Scholar
19
-
Olsson, C. (2002). Risk Management in Emerging Markets How to Survive and Prosper. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar
20
-
Parshall, J. (2012). Mature Fields Hold Big Expansion Opportunity. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 6.
Google Scholar
21
-
Pribadi, E. A. (2022, 03 22). Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. [Internet] Retrieved from www.esdm.go.id: https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/harga-minyak-masih-tinggi-esdm-monitor-perkembangan-dan-dampak-harga.
Google Scholar
22
-
Raad Alkadiri, R. M. (2022, 04). Top Risks facing the Oil and Gas Industry in 2022. KPMG. Retrieved from: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2022/04/top-risks-facing-the-oil-and-gas-industry-in-2022.html.
Google Scholar
23
-
Rothaermel, F. T. (2021). Strategic Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Google Scholar
24
-
Seba, R. D. (1993). Economics of Worldwide Petroleum Production. Tulsa: OGCI Publications.
Google Scholar
25
-
SKK MIGAS. (2018). Authorization for Expenditure (AFE). Retrieved from: https://www.skkmigas.go.id/assets/PTK/dbe9d91917f29bf66a93324c8b15bfe0.pdf
Google Scholar
26
-
Thurber, P. A. (2010). On The State's Choice of Oil Company: Risk Management and The Frontier of the Petroleum Industry. Stanford: Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
Google Scholar
27
-
Voigtlander, J. R. (2006). Technical and Economic Challenge of Mature Gas Fields: The Giant Altmark Field, Germany. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 38-39.
Google Scholar
28
-
Walt Aldred, D. P. (1999). Managing Drilling Risk. [Internet] Retrieved from Schlumberger: slb.com/-/media/files/oilfield-review/manage.
Google Scholar
29
-
Zhang, Z., He, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y. (2022). Geopolitical risk trends and crude oil price predictability. Energy, 258, 124824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124824.
Google Scholar
30
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Romy,
Yunieta A. Nainggolan,
Revenue Acceleration by Temporary Rental Pump Option in Plato Platform: Case Study in PT. Prominent Petro , European Journal of Business and Management Research: Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023)