Financial Forecasting, Risk-taking and Venture Performance

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Mark Simon

  •   Rodney C. Shrader

Abstract

This conceptual paper develops a model based on prospect theory that explores how the effort entrepreneurs expend developing financial forecasts may influence risk-taking and performance. It proposes that the more effort they expend on developing forecasts, the more likely they will be to use the results of the forecasts as reference points against which they evaluate their ventures’ future performance. Furthermore, we propose that effort leads to more optimistic reference points that are less likely to be adjusted. Our model suggests that these factors are related to subsequent risk-taking by entrepreneurs. The model further suggests that, for entrepreneurs, the relationship between risk-taking and performance is moderated by the level of utility the entrepreneur experiences from venture performance.


Keywords: Forecasting, Prospect Theory, Reference Point, Risk-Taking.

References

Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L., & Huffman, D. (2011). Reference points and effort provision. The American Economic Review, 101(2), 470-492.

Astebro, T., Jeffrey, S. A., & Adomdza, G. K. (2007). Inven¬tor perseverance after being told to quit: The role of cognitive biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(3), 253-272.

Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic ‘why’ questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221-239.

Brinckmann, J., Grichnik, D., & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning-performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24-40.

Cassar, G. (2010). Are individuals entering self-employment overly optimistic? An empirical test of plans and projections on nascent entrepreneur expectations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 822.

Chwolka, A. & Raith M. G. (2012). The value of business planning before start-up—A decision-theoretical perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(3), 385-399.

Cooper, A. C., & Artz, K. W. (1995). Determinants of satisfaction for entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 439.

Cooper, A.C., Woo, C., & Dunkelberg, W. (1988). Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 97-108.

Corman, J., Perles, B., & Yancini, P. (1988). Motivational factors influencing high-technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(1), 36.

Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Rebmann, A. (2017). Prospect theory and the effects of bankruptcy laws on entrepreneurial aspirations. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 977-997.

Hills, G. E. (1985). Market analysis in the business plan: Venture capitalists’ perceptions. Journal of Small Business Management, 23(1), 38.

Hills, G.E. & Shrader, R. C. (1998). Successful entrepreneurs’ insights into opportunity recognition. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College: 30-43.

Hmieleski K. & Baron R. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 473-488.

Hsu, D. K., Wiklund, J., & Cotton, R. D. (2017). Success, failure, and entrepreneurial reentry: An experimental assessment of the veracity of self-efficacy and prospect theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 19-47.

Kahneman, D. & A. Tversky (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31.

Maxwell, A. L., & Levesque, M. (2014). Trustworthiness: A critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seeking investors. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1057-1080.

Read, D. (2007). Experienced utility: Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. Thinking and Reasoning, 1(13), 45-61.

Sandberg, W. R., Schweiger, D. M., & Hofer, C. W. (1988). The use of verbal protocols in determining venture capitalists’ decision processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(2), 8.

Shrader R. C., Simon, M. & Stanton, S. (2021). Financial forecasting and risky decisions: an experimental study grounded in prospect theory. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(4), 1827-1841.

Simon, M., Houghton, S., & Savelli, S. (2003). Out of the frying pan…? Why small business managers introduce high risk products. Journal of Business Venturing. 18(3), 419 - 440.

Simon, M., & Kim, J. (2017). Two sources of overconfidence: Incorporating disconfirming feedback in an entrepreneurial context. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 27(3), 9-24.

Simon, M., & Shrader, R. C. (2012). Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: The role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(3), 291.

Sykes, H. B., & Dunham, D. (1995). Critical assumption planning: A practical tool for managing business development risk. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 413.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2008). The role of knowledge accessibility in cognition and behavior: Implications for consumer information processing. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Marketing and consumer psychology series: Vol. 4. Handbook of consumer psychology (p. 31–76). Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Simon, M., & Shrader, R. C. (2022). Financial Forecasting, Risk-taking and Venture Performance. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.6.1693