Trade Openness and Regional Inequality: Case of Tunisia



Abstract Views
209

Downloads
198

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Dec 8, 2022
Published Jan 7, 2023
10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.1.1778

Abstract viewed = 209 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Since the 1990s, Tunisia has experienced an increasingly pronounced trade openness and has adopted a multitude of reforms to reinforce it through a large number of agreements with different foreign partners. However, this openness has gone simultaneously with an increase in regional inequalities wish have continued to grow, that is why we are interested in verifying, on one side, how this openness affects economic growth and, on the other one, whether it increases regional disparities within the country over the period (1990-2018). We start from the hypothesis that if trade openness manages to boost economic growth, its positive outcomes can have a contrasting effect at the regional level, benefiting some regions to the detriment of others. By crossing this double effect openness can accentuate territorial imbalances. We will use panel data econometrics to estimate our model. We will test the effect of openness on territorial disparities for the Tunisian case, especially between the 24 governorates where, there is no measure of regional inequalities yet, hence the interest of this study. Our econometric analysis clearly shows that the differences in endowments and characteristics at the level of the regions, such as differences in infrastructure or human capital, positively affect regional inequalities. Openness also appears to be a factor of positive influence, in particular by enhancing the polarization of economic activities and FDI within certain regions to the detriment of others.
Keywords: Panel Data, Regional Inequality, Trade Openness, Tunisia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ades, A. F., & Glaeser, E. L. (1995). Trade and circuses: explaining urban giants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 195-227.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, J. D. (2018). International trade and regional inequality (No. 1806). CEPREMAP.
     Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R., & Lee, J. (1994). Sources of economic growth. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 40(1), 1-46; Elsevier.
     Google Scholar
  5. Baylis, K., Garduño-Rivera, R., & Piras, G. (2009). The distributional effects of NAFTA in Mexico: Evidence from a panel of municipalities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1-2), 286-302.
     Google Scholar
  6. Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647.
     Google Scholar
  7. Behrens, K. (2003). International trade and internal geography revisited (Doctoral dissertation, Laboratoire d'analyse et de techniques économiques (LATEC)).
     Google Scholar
  8. Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(2), 143-173.
     Google Scholar
  9. Brülhart, M., Carrère, C., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2018). Trade and towns: Heterogeneous adjustment to a border shock. Journal of Urban Economics, 105, 162-175.
     Google Scholar
  10. Catin, M., & Ghio, S. (2004). Stages of regional development and spatial concentration. Région et Développement, 19, 185-221.
     Google Scholar
  11. Catin, M., & Van Huffel, C. (2004). L’impact de l’ouverture économique sur la concentration spatiale dans les pays en développement. Région et Développement, 20, 123-157. French.
     Google Scholar
  12. Catin, M., & Van Huffel, C. (2004). Ouverture économique et inégalités régionales de développement en Chine : le rôle des institutions. Mondes en Développement, (4), 7-23. French.
     Google Scholar
  13. Chai, J. C. (1996). Divergent development and regional income gap in China. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 26(1), 46-58.
     Google Scholar
  14. Charlot, S., & Schmitt, B. (1999). Public infrastructure and economic growth in France's regions. Paper No. 129. ERSA 39th Congress, Dublin, Ireland.
     Google Scholar
  15. Connolly, M. (2003). The dual nature of trade: measuring its impact on imitation and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 31-55.
     Google Scholar
  16. Crozet, M., & Koenig-Soubeyran, P. (2002). EU Enlargement and industrial relocation within the CEECs. Manuscript, TEAM–Paris. 1. VIIth Spring Meeting of Young Economists, Paris, 19 April, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  17. Daumal, M. (2013). The impact of trade openness on regional inequality: the cases of India and Brazil. The International Trade Journal, 27(3), 243-280.
     Google Scholar
  18. Daumal, M., & Ozyurt, S. (2010). The Impact of International Trade Flows on the Growth of Brazilian States. In Document De Travail, DT/2010–01.
     Google Scholar
  19. Domecq, J. P., & Regnault, H. (1990). Tunisie : DIT, développement littoral, stagnation intérieure. RERU. Revue Régionale d'Economie Urbaine, (4), 523-533. French.
     Google Scholar
  20. El Bekri, F. (2000). Disparités régionales et développement en Tunisie. Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, (5), 887-914. French.
     Google Scholar
  21. Faber, B. (2007). Towards the spatial patterns of sectoral adjustments to trade liberalisation: The case of NAFTA in Mexico. Growth and Change, 38(4), 567-594.
     Google Scholar
  22. Fajgelbaum, P. D., & Redding, S. J. (2014). External integration, structural transformation and economic development: Evidence from Argentina 1870-1914, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 20217.
     Google Scholar
  23. Farole, T. (2013). Trade Openness and Regional Inequality. The Internal Geography of Trade, 33-63.
     Google Scholar
  24. Fazekas, K. (2005). Effects of FDI inflows on regional labour market differences in Hungary. Economie Internationale, (2), 83-105.
     Google Scholar
  25. Figlio, D. N., & Blonigen, B. A. (2000). The effects of foreign direct investment on local communities. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(2), 338-363.
     Google Scholar
  26. Ford, T. C., Logan, B., & Logan, J. (2009). NAFTA or Nada? Trade's impact on US border retailers. Growth and Change, 40(2), 260-286.
     Google Scholar
  27. Fu, X. (2004). Limited linkages from growth engines and regional disparities in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(1), 148-164.
     Google Scholar
  28. Ge, Y. (2009). Globalization and industry agglomeration in China. World Development, 37(3), 550-559.
     Google Scholar
  29. Gelan, A. (2003). Local economic impacts: the British open. Annals of tourism research, 30(2), 406-425.
     Google Scholar
  30. Ghio, S., & Van Huffel, C. (1999). Politiques de libéralisation commerciale dans les pays en développement et niveaux d’infrastructures: les effets sur l'hyperconcentration urbaine. Stratégies, concurrence et mutations industrielles. French.
     Google Scholar
  31. González Rivas, M. (2007). The effects of trade openness on regional inequality in Mexico. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(3), 545-561.
     Google Scholar
  32. Hanson, G. H. (1997). Increasing returns, trade and the regional structure of wages. The Economic Journal, 107(440), 113-133.
     Google Scholar
  33. Hanson, G.H. (1998). Market Potential, Increasing Returns, and Geographic Concentration. NBER Working Paper 6429.
     Google Scholar
  34. Henderson, J. R. (2002). Will the rural economy rebound with the rest of the nation? Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 87(1), 65-83.
     Google Scholar
  35. Henderson, V. (1997). Medium-sized cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 27, 583-612.
     Google Scholar
  36. Heo, S. & Oh, J. (2015). The effects of trade openness on regional inequality in South Korea, 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: World Renaissance: Changing Roles for People and Places, 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve.
     Google Scholar
  37. Hsu, C. M., & Liu, W. C. (2004). The role of Taiwanese foreign direct investment in China: Economic integration or hollowing-out? Korea and the World Economy, 5(2), 207-231.
     Google Scholar
  38. Jones, D. C., & Cheng, L. (2003). Growth and regional inequality in China during the reform era. China Economic Review, 14(2), 186-200.
     Google Scholar
  39. Jordaan, J. A. (2008). State characteristics and the locational choice of foreign direct investment: Evidence from regional FDI in Mexico 1989–2006. Growth and Change, 39(3), 389-413.
     Google Scholar
  40. Kanbur, R., & Zhang, X. (1999). Which regional inequality? The evolution of rural–urban and inland–coastal inequality in China from 1983 to 1995. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27(4), 686-701.
     Google Scholar
  41. Karray, Z., & Driss, S. (2009). Structure industrielle, économies d’agglomération, ouverture et croissance régionale en Tunisie. Région et Développement, 29(2), 141-57. French.
     Google Scholar
  42. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  43. Krueger, A. B., & Lindahl, M. (2001). Education for growth: Why and for whom? Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1101-1136.
     Google Scholar
  44. Krugman, P., & Elizondo, R. L. (1996). Trade policy and the third world metropolis. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 137-150.
     Google Scholar
  45. Lanaspa, L., Pueyo, F., & Sanz, F. (2003). The evolution of Spanish urban structure during the twentieth century. Urban Studies, 40(3), 567-580.
     Google Scholar
  46. Lin, J. Y., & Liu, Z. (2000). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(1), 1-21.
     Google Scholar
  47. Martin, P., & Rogers, C. A. (1994). Trade effects of regional aid (No. 910). CEPR Discussion Papers.
     Google Scholar
  48. Métral, A. (2003). Forces centrifuges et forces centripètes autour de la métropole tunisoise. Les entrepreneurs locaux, acteurs de la localisation industrielle. Revue d’Economie Regionale Urbaine, (2), 267-290. French.
     Google Scholar
  49. Monfort, P., & Nicolini, R. (2000). Regional Convergence and International Integration. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(2), 286-306.
     Google Scholar
  50. Moomaw, R. L., & Shatter, A. M. (1996). Urbanization and economic development: a bias toward large cities? Journal of Urban Economics, 40(1), 13-37.
     Google Scholar
  51. Mullen, J. K., & Williams, M. (2005). Foreign direct investment and regional economic performance. Kyklos, 58(2), 265-282.
     Google Scholar
  52. Najeh, A. (2015). Aux sources des disparités géographiques en Tunisie : la contribution du modèle de développement socio-économique, de la croissance économique et du facteur institutionnel (Doctoral dissertation, Université Montpellier).
     Google Scholar
  53. Nelson, R. R., & Phelps, E. S. (1966). Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. The American economic review, 56(1/2), 69-75.
     Google Scholar
  54. Özyurt, S., & Daumal, M. (2013). Trade openness and regional income spillovers in Brazil: a spatial econometric approach. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 197-215.
     Google Scholar
  55. Paluzie, E. (2001). Trade policy and regional inequalities. Papers in regional science, 80(1), 67-85.
     Google Scholar
  56. Paluzie, E., Pons, J., & Tirado, D. A. (2001). Regional integration and specialization patterns in Spain. Regional studies, 35(4), 285-296.
     Google Scholar
  57. Parks, R. W. (1967). Efficient estimation of a system of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 500-509.
     Google Scholar
  58. Pritchett, L. (2001). Where has all the education gone? The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 367-391.
     Google Scholar
  59. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). Trade and Regional Inequality, Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, 88(2), 109-136.
     Google Scholar
  60. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sánchez-Reaza, J. (2003). Economic polarization through trade: Trade liberalization and regional growth in Mexico. Discussion Paper, 2003/60. Finland: Wider-United Nations University.
     Google Scholar
  61. Sala-i-Martin X. (2002b), the world distribution of income (estimated from individual country distribution), NBER Working Paper 8933.
     Google Scholar
  62. Sánchez‐Reaza, J., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2002). The impact of trade liberalization on regional disparities in Mexico. Growth and change, 33(1), 72-90.
     Google Scholar
  63. Shantong, L., & Fan 1, Z. (2002). China’s WTO accession and implications for its regional economies. Économie Internationale, (4), 67-101.
     Google Scholar
  64. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320.
     Google Scholar
  65. Venables, T. (2000). Cities and Trade: external trade and internal geography in developing countries. World Development Report, Entering the 21st Century.
     Google Scholar