Importance and Effectiveness of Different Safety Training Methods and their Application in Iron Ore Pelletizing Plants



Abstract Views
184

Downloads
169

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Dec 16, 2022
Published Jan 18, 2023
10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.1.1790

Abstract viewed = 184 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Iron ore pelletizing plants present several types of hazards and risks that can contribute to occupational incidents and material losses. Hazard Identification and Risk assessment is a process to identify causes and consequences including significance level considering both probability and consequences of occurrences. Henceforth, preventive and mitigation measures are established, communicated, and verified to prevent unwanted incidents and events. In 1950 the National Safety Council introduced the hierarchy of controls inspired by a philosophy that controlling exposures to occupational hazards is the fundamental method of protecting workers. The hierarchy of control was established to prove that design, elimination, substitution, and engineering controls should be the most effective when applied in preventing occupational incidents followed by administrative controls and Personal Protective Equipment. Safety training is one of the important preventive measures falling under the category of administrative controls. However, training effectiveness shall be considered in all phases such as training design, delivery, and post-training monitoring. In this paper, the main iron ore pelletizing safety hazards and risks such as the conveyor belt system will be reviewed and a discussion on the effectiveness, barriers, and constraints of traditional safety training programs and the consideration of advantages and challenges of the immersive training program in ensuring the effectiveness in improving risk perception, safe behavior and reducing occupational safety incidents.
Keywords: Effective Training, Immersive Training, Iron Ore, Pelletizing Plants, Safety, Safety Training, Virtual Reality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alsharef, A., Albert, A., Jaselskis, E., & Bhandari, S. (2020). Construction Safety Training: Barriers, Challenges, and Opportunities. In Construction Research Congress 2020: Safety, Workforce, and Education (pp. 547-555). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers
     Google Scholar
  2. Albert, A., Hallowell, M. R., Kleiner, B. M. (2014b). "Enhancing Construction Hazard Recognition and Communication with Energy-Based Cognitive Mnemonics and Safety Meeting Maturity Model: Multiple Baseline Study. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 140(2), 04013042.
     Google Scholar
  3. Benjaoran, V., Bhokha, S. (2010). An integrated safety management with construction management using 4D CAD model. Safety Science, 48(3), 395–403.
     Google Scholar
  4. Brahm, F., Singer, M. (2013). Is more engaging safety training always better in reducing accidents? Evidence of self-selection from Chilean panel data. Journal of Safety Resources, 47(4) 85–92.
     Google Scholar
  5. Cheung, S.O., Cheung, K.K.W., Suen, H.C.H. (2004). CSHM: Web-based safety and health monitoring system for construction management. Journal of Safety Research, 35(2), 159–170.
     Google Scholar
  6. Duan, J., & Liu, X. (2021). Online monitoring of green pellet size distribution in haze-degraded images based on VGG16-LU-net and haze judgement. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 1–1. doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3052018.
     Google Scholar
  7. Fung, I. W. H., Lo, T. Y. & Tung, K. C. F. (2012). Towards a better reliability of risk assessment: Development of a qualitative & quantitative risk evaluation model (Q2REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 167-184.
     Google Scholar
  8. Goldbeck, L. (2003). Conveyor Safety and Education. Aggregates Manager.
     Google Scholar
  9. HaiyanXie, Tudoreanu, M. E., Weishi (2006). Development of a Virtual Reality Safety-Training System for Construction Workers. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, p. 9
     Google Scholar
  10. Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 – legislation explained. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2022, from: https://www.hse.gov.uk/legislation/hswa.htm.
     Google Scholar
  11. Lucas, J., Thabet, W., & Worlikar, P. (2007). Using virtual reality (VR) to improve conveyor belt safety in surface mining. In 24th W78 Conference Maribor 2007 & 5th ITCEDU Workshop & 14th EG-ICE Workshop: Bringing ITC knowledge to work (pp. 431-438).
     Google Scholar
  12. Namian, M., Albert, A., Zuluaga, C. M., Behm, M. (2016). Role of Safety Training: Impact on Hazard Recognition and Safety Risk Perception. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 142(12), 04016073.
     Google Scholar
  13. Nomura, T., Yamamoto, N., Fujii, T., & Takiguchi, Y. (2015). Beneficiation plants and pelletizing plants for utilizing low grade iron ore. Kobelco Technology Review, 33, 8-15.
     Google Scholar
  14. Olshannikova, E., Ometov, A., Koucheryavy, Y. (2015). Visualizing Big Data with augmented and virtual reality: challenges and research agenda. Journal of. Big Data, 2(1) 27.
     Google Scholar
  15. Rajak, R., Chattopadhyay, A., & Maurya, P. (2021). Accidents and injuries in workers of iron and steel industry in West Bengal, India: Prevalence and associated risk factors. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(4), 2533–2540. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.2012021.
     Google Scholar
  16. Rout, B. K., & Sikdar, B. K. (2017). Hazard identification, risk assessment, and control measures as an effective tool of occupational health assessment of hazardous process in an iron ore pelletizing industry. Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 21(2), 56.
     Google Scholar
  17. Vieira, C. B., Seshadri, V., Oliveira, R. A. R., Reinhardt, P., Calazans, P. M. P., & Vieira Filho, J. B. (2017). Applying virtual reality model to green ironmaking industry and education: ‘a case study of charcoal mini-blast furnace plant'. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 126(1-2), 116-123.
     Google Scholar
  18. Velev, D., & Zlateva, P. (2017). Virtual reality challenges in education and training. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 33-37.
     Google Scholar
  19. Wallen, E. S., Mulloy, K. B. (2006). Computer-based training for safety: comparing methods with older and younger workers. Journal of Safety Research 37(5), 461–467.
     Google Scholar
  20. Woksepp, S., Jongeling, R., & Olofsson, T. (2005). Applying Virtual Reality and 4D CAD models in the scheduling process of a large pelletizing plant. In International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, September 12-13, 2005. (pp. 352-360).
     Google Scholar
  21. Yuan, D., Jin, X., Zhang, J., Han, D., (2007). Applying open-source game engine for building visual simulation training system of firefighting. AsiaSim 2007, CCIS 5, 365–374.
     Google Scholar
  22. (ISO 45001:2018) Geneva: ISO. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/iso-45001-occupational-health-and-safety.
     Google Scholar