Influence of Transformational Leadership on Change Management in the County Governments in Kenya
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The environment in which the County Governments in Kenya operate is dynamic and changes often. The 2017 elections brought in new changes such as 3 female governors for the first time in the history of Kenya. Despite this the county governments continue to apply old and traditional methods to solve new kind of problems. This has led to numerous reported cases of corruption, political rivalry, conflict of interest, mismanagement of funds and undue procedures followed contrary to the existing regulations. The general objective of this study was to establish the influence of transformational leadership on change management among devolved units in Kenya. Specifically, the study aimed at determining the influence of idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individual consideration on change management. This research adopted the Transformational-Transactional Leadership Theory, Kotter’s 8 Step Change Model and ADKAR model of change. A descriptive research design was used in this research. The 47 devolved units in Kenya served as the research population. This research relied on primary data collected through questionnaires. The collected data was converted into quantitative format to make analysis using statistical package for social sciences. The statistics generated were descriptive statistics which included mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics which included both correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The study revealed a significant positive relationship between idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individual consideration and change management among devolved units. Regression analysis revealed that 51.5% of changes in change management among counties were attributed to the four indicators of transformational leadership. In conclusion, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individual consideration are essential in enhancing change management. Based on the findings, intellectual stimulation had the greatest influence on change management followed by inspirational motivation while individual consideration and idealized influence had the least influence. As a result, it is recommended that policy makers among the county governments should concentrate on transformational leadership because this improves change management.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
-
Bainbridge, C. (2012). Designing for change: A practical guide for business transformation. John Wiley.
Google Scholar
1
-
Bass, B. (2009). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership. Sage.
Google Scholar
2
-
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage.
Google Scholar
3
-
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership.
Google Scholar
4
-
Chen, C. C., Wu, J., Yang, S. C., & Tsou, H. Y. (2008). Importance of diversified leadership roles in improving team effectiveness in a virtual collaboration learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 304-321.
Google Scholar
5
-
Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational Leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 177-193.
Google Scholar
6
-
Cohen, A. R., & Fink, S. L. (2001). Effective behavior in organizations: Cases, concepts, and student experiences. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Google Scholar
7
-
García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of Transformational Leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management, 19(4), 299–319.
Google Scholar
8
-
Gonnah, B. J. & Ogollah, K. (2016). Effect of Transformational Leadership on performance of commercial banks in Kenya: Case of Family Bank Limited. International Academic Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 1-2
Google Scholar
9
-
Gupta, V., Singh, S., Kumar, S., Bhattacharya, A. (2012). Development of a causal framework linking leadership to employee creativity: A study of Indian R&D laboratories. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48, 120-136.
Google Scholar
10
-
Hancott, D. E. (2005). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational performance in the largest public companies in Canada. Capella University.
Google Scholar
11
-
Hiatt, J. M. & Creasey, T. J. (2003). Change Management: The people side of change. Prosci.
Google Scholar
12
-
Hickman, G. R. (2009). Leading change in multiple contexts: Concepts and practices in organizational, community, political, social, and global change settings. Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
13
-
Hickman, G. R., & Couto, R. A. (2009). Causality, change, and leadership. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.), Leading change in multiple contexts. Sage. Pg. -31
Google Scholar
14
-
House, R. J., Hanges, P. M., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage.
Google Scholar
15
-
Kent, S. G. (2014). American public libraries: A long transformative moment. Daedalus, 125(4), 207-220.
Google Scholar
16
-
Kotter, J.P. (1947). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.
Google Scholar
17
-
Leadership, T. (1998). Industry, Military and Educational Impact.
Google Scholar
18
-
Lievens, F., Van Geit, P. & Coetsier, P. (2007). Identification of Transformational Leadership Qualities: An Examination of Potential Biases. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6(4), 415-430.
Google Scholar
19
-
Mugenda, A., & Mugenda, O. (2003). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative approaches NAIROBI: African Center for Technology Studies (ACTS).
Google Scholar
20
-
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Google Scholar
21
-
Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Sage.
Google Scholar
22
-
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Sage.
Google Scholar
23
-
Olsen, M. D., Ching-Yick, T., & West, J. J. (1998). Strategic management in the hospitality industry (2nd Ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
Google Scholar
24
-
Parolini, J., Patterson, K., & Winston, B. (2009). Distinguishing between transformational and servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(3), 274-291
Google Scholar
25
-
Phipps, K. (2012). Spirituality and Strategic Leadership: The Influence of Spiritual Beliefs on Strategic Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(2), 177- 189
Google Scholar
26
-
Podsakoff, MacKenzie, & Bommer (1947). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259-298.
Google Scholar
27
-
Sasaka, P., Namusonge, G., & Sakwa, M., (2014). Effects of Strategic Management Practices on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance of Parastatals in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 2(1), 106-128.
Google Scholar
28
-
Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986a). The transformational leader. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Google Scholar
29
-
Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986b). The transformational leader. Training and Development Journal, 40(7), 27-32.
Google Scholar
30
-
Tiengmany, S. (2015). Appropriate leadership styles inspire employees to adapt to change, at the National University of Laos (NUOL).
Google Scholar
31
-
Tucker, V. & Russell, R. (2014). Transformational Leadership and outcomes: Role of relationship duration. Leadership and Organization Journal, 26(5/6), 442-457.
Google Scholar
32
-
Waldman, D. A., Balthazard, P. A., & Peterson, S. J. (2011). Leadership and neuroscience: Can we revolutionize the way that inspirational leaders are identified and developed? Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 60-74.
Google Scholar
33
-
Yukl, G. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The leadership quarterly, 20(1), 49-53.
Google Scholar
34