##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic shook the entire world. All sectors, industries, organisations, and more importantly, people were affected by multiple restrictions implemented by their respective governing bodies. Federal lockdowns and all the emerging laws and regulations associated with them have forced organisations worldwide to transition their operations to remote environments. The implications from the organisations’ perspective vary from leadership to management, structure to operations, and training and development to policy making. However, from the employees’ perspective, the implications vary from general well-being to work engagement, satisfaction to motivation, and followership to trust. Nonetheless, remote work has other implications, such as productivity, the impact of social distancing, work-life balance, and isolation concerns. Therefore, this article aims to present critical thinking and comprehensively analyse the existing literature on remote working, transformational leadership, and work engagement contexts. Theoretical and practical gaps are discussed, and recommendations for future research could contribute to our better understanding of remote leadership and its practical elements. Remote working environments are believed to be permanent working arrangements for many organisations and employees; hence, scholars and practitioners must explore them to further depths.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aczel, B., Kovacs, M., van der Lippe, T., & Szaszi, B. (2021). Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0249127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249127.
     Google Scholar
  2. Adisa, T. A., Aiyenitaju, O., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). The work–family balance of British working women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-07-2020-0036.
     Google Scholar
  3. Al-Habaibeh, A., Watkins, M., Waried, K., & Javareshk, M. B. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of remotely working from home during Covid-19 pandemic. Global Transitions, 3, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2021.11.001.
     Google Scholar
  4. Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.04.001.
     Google Scholar
  5. Aslam, U., Muqadas, F., Imran, M. K., & Rahman, U. U. (2018). Investigating the antecedents of work disengagement in the workplace. Journal of Management Development, 37(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2017-0210.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bandekar, S. B. (2014). Work Life Balance—A special reference to Working Women—A Case Study.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bapuji, H., Ertug, G., & Shaw, J. D. (2020). Organizations and Societal Economic Inequality: A Review and Way Forward. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 60–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0029.
     Google Scholar
  9. Bartsch, S., Weber, E., Büttgen, M., & Huber, A. (2020). Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: How to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Service Management, 32(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0160.
     Google Scholar
  10. Bass, B. M., & Bass Bernard, M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.
     Google Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3).
     Google Scholar
  12. Bernard, M. Bass. 1998. Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact.
     Google Scholar
  13. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2005). Transformational leadership theory. Organizational behavior I. Essential theories of motivation and leadership.
     Google Scholar
  14. Bedarkar, M., & Pandita, D. (2014). A Study on the Drivers of Employee Engagement Impacting Employee Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.174.
     Google Scholar
  15. Benmira, S., & Agboola, M. (2021). Evolution of leadership theory. BMJ Leader, leader-2020-000296. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000296.
     Google Scholar
  16. Bromfield, S. M. (2022). Worker Agency versus Wellbeing in the Enforced Work-From-Home Arrangement during COVID-19: A Labour Process Analysis. Challenges, 13(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010011.
     Google Scholar
  17. Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
     Google Scholar
  18. Chartered Institute of Personnel Development (2022). An update on flexible and hybrid working practices. Report for the Royal Charter. Report no. 8231, April.
     Google Scholar
  19. Chaudhary, V., Mohanty, S., Malik, P., Apsara Saleth Mary, A., Pai Maroor, J., & Nomani, M. Z. M. (2022). Factors affecting virtual employee engagement in India during Covid-19. Materials Today: Proceedings, 51, 571–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.685
     Google Scholar
  20. Czarnowsky, M. (2008). Learning’s role in employee engagement: An ASTD research study. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.
     Google Scholar
  21. de Klerk, J. J., Joubert, M., & Mosca, H. F. (2021). Is working from home the new workplace panacea? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for the future world of work. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1883.
     Google Scholar
  22. Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends (2021). The social enterprise in a world disrupted. Report, Deloitte Insights.
     Google Scholar
  23. Edwards, M. (2018). Bridging the gap: An evidence-based approach to employee engagement. Report for the Institute for Employment Studies. Report no. 141, September.
     Google Scholar
  24. Eldor, L., Harpaz, I., & Westman, M. (2020). The Work/Nonwork Spillover: The Enrichment Role of Work Engagement. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816647362
     Google Scholar
  25. Gallup (2017, May 14). The state of the global workforce. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/257552/state-global-workplace-2017.aspx.
     Google Scholar
  26. Ge, Y. (2020). Psychological safety, employee voice, and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(3), 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  27. Gebauer, J., Lowman, D., & Gordon, J. (2008). Closing the engagement gap: How great companies unlock employee potential for superior results. Penguin.
     Google Scholar
  28. George, J. M. (2011). The wider context, costs, and benefits of work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 53-59.
     Google Scholar
  29. Harter, J. (2021, July 29). U.S. employee engagement data hold steady in first half of 2021. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/352949/employee-engagement-holds-steady-first-half-2021.aspx.
     Google Scholar
  30. House, R. J. (1976). A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership. Working Paper Series.
     Google Scholar
  31. HR.com (2019). The State of Employee Engagement in 2019. Report, HR.Research Institute.
     Google Scholar
  32. Imperatori, B. (2017). Engagement and disengagement at work: Drivers and organizational practices to sustain employee passion and performance. Springer.
     Google Scholar
  33. Keating, L. A., & Heslin, P. A. (2015). The potential role of mindsets in unleashing employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 25(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.008
     Google Scholar
  34. Kelley, E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2012). Context matters: Testing a model of remote leadership. Journal of Leadership & organizational studies, 19(4), 437-449.
     Google Scholar
  35. Kirkman, B. L., & Stoverink, A. C. (2021). Building Resilient Virtual Teams. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100825.
     Google Scholar
  36. Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., et al. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716.
     Google Scholar
  37. Safonov, Y., Maslennikov, Y., Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine, Lenska, N., & Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine. (2018). EVOLUTION AND MODERN TENDENCIES IN THE THEORY OF LEADERSHIP. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-304-310.
     Google Scholar
  38. Lauring, J., & Jonasson, C. (2022). How is work group inclusiveness influenced by working virtually? Human Resource Management Review, 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100930.
     Google Scholar
  39. Li, P., Sun, J.-M., Taris, T. W., Xing, L., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2021). Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101458.
     Google Scholar
  40. Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010.
     Google Scholar
  41. Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., & Smit, S. (2020, November 23). What’s next for remote work: An analysis of 2,000 tasks, 800 jobs, and nine countries. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/whats-next-for-remote-work-an-analysis-of-2000-tasks-800-jobs-and-nine-countries.
     Google Scholar
  42. Maduka, N. S., Edwards, H., Greenwood, D., Osborne, A., & Babatunde, S. O. (2018). Analysis of competencies for effective virtual team leadership in building successful organisations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0124.
     Google Scholar
  43. Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2021). Getting to know you: The importance of familiarity in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 100844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100844.
     Google Scholar
  44. Miglioretti, M., Gragnano, A., Margheritti, S., & Picco, E. (2021). Not All Telework is Valuable. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 37(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2021a6
     Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell, A., & Brewer, P. E. (2021). Leading hybrid teams: Strategies for realizing the best of both worlds. Organizational Dynamics, 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100866.
     Google Scholar
  46. Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2015). Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 235-289.
     Google Scholar
  47. Morgan, J. (2014). The future of work: Attract new talent, build better leaders, and create a competitive organization. John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  48. Mudrack, P. E. (2004). Job involvement, obsessive‐compulsive personality traits, and workaholic behavioral tendencies. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(5), 490–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410554506.
     Google Scholar
  49. Ogunfowora, B., Weinhardt, J. M., & Hwang, C. C. (2021). Abusive supervision differentiation and employee outcomes: The roles of envy, resentment, and insecure group attachment. Journal of Management, 47(3), 623-653.
     Google Scholar
  50. Palumbo, R. (2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), Article 6/7. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0150.
     Google Scholar
  51. Paravano, M. & Whittaker, A. (2017). Remote work & productivity 101: Articles about remote work & reviews of 20 useful productivity apps for all devices. Mauro Paravano.
     Google Scholar
  52. Pattnaik, L., & Jena, L. K. (2021). Mindfulness, remote engagement and employee morale: Conceptual analysis to address the “new normal”. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(4), 873–890. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2020-2267.
     Google Scholar
  53. Rabiul, M. K., & Yean, T. F. (2021). Leadership styles, motivating language, and work engagement: An empirical investigation of the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102712.
     Google Scholar
  54. Safonov, Y., Maslennikov, Y., & Lenska, N. (2018). Evolution and modern tendencies in the theory of leadership. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 304-310.
     Google Scholar
  55. Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835.
     Google Scholar
  56. Sandoval-Reyes, J., Idrovo-Carlier, S., & Duque-Oliva, E. J. (2021). Remote Work, Work Stress, and Work–Life during Pandemic Times: A Latin America Situation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137069.
     Google Scholar
  57. Sinclair, M. A., Stephens, K., Whiteman, K., Swanson-Biearman, B., & Clark, J. (2021). Managing and motivating the remote employee using the transformational leadership model. Nurse Leader, 19(3), 294-299.
     Google Scholar
  58. Tanpipat, W., Lim, H. W., & Deng, X. (2021). Implementing Remote Working Policy in Corporate Offices in Thailand: Strategic Facility Management Perspective. Sustainability, 13(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031284.
     Google Scholar
  59. Taylor H, Vigneau L, Florisson R, & Khan, M. (2021). Hybrid and remote working in the North of England: Impacts and future prospects. Report, Newcastle University Business School, UK, July.
     Google Scholar
  60. Torres, S., & Orhan, M. A. (2022). How it started, how it’s going: Why past research does not encompass pandemic-induced remote work realities and what leaders can do for more inclusive remote work practices. Psychology of Leaders and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000135.
     Google Scholar
  61. Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020). Social Isolation and Stress as Predictors of Productivity Perception and Remote Work Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Concern about the Virus in a Moderated Double Mediation. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239804.
     Google Scholar
  62. Van Seters, D. A., & Field, R. H. (1990). The evolution of leadership theory. Journal of organizational change management.
     Google Scholar
  63. Van Zoonen, W., & Sivunen, A. E. (2022). The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(4), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.2002299.
     Google Scholar
  64. Vartiainen, M. (2021). Telework and remote work. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
     Google Scholar
  65. Walsh, M. M., & Arnold, K. A. (2020). The bright and dark sides of employee mindfulness: Leadership style and employee well‐being. Stress and Health, 36(3), 287-298.
     Google Scholar
  66. Weideman, M., & Hofmeyr, K. B. (2021). Corrigendum: The influence of flexible work arrangements on employee engagement: An exploratory study. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1522
     Google Scholar
  67. Willcocks, L. (2020, April 2). Remote working: Here to stay? LSE Business Review. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/04/02/remote-working-here-to-stay/.
     Google Scholar
  68. World Health Organization (2022, October 1). Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.
     Google Scholar
  69. Žnidaršič, J., & Bernik, M. (2021). Impact of work-family balance results on employee work engagement within the organization: The case of Slovenia. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0245078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245078.
     Google Scholar