##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The writing of this paper is entitled the impact of job satisfaction on loyalty through the work environment and self-reward. Using primary data on industrial companies' estate that aim to find out how much impact the selected variables have in increasing job loyalty. Although many have researched work loyalty, it is still interesting to continue because there are always changes. This study used pathway analysis, which was considered close to appropriate for primary data. In terms of the data analysis results regarding the direct influence of the work environment, self-reward on job satisfaction, and its impact on employee loyalty, the hypothesis test found that the Work Environment variable has a direct effect on the Job Satisfaction variable as well as from the self-reward variable. Job Satisfaction is directly affected by the Self Reward variable. Employee loyalty is influenced by job satisfaction. This demonstrates that employee work happiness is critical and should be prioritized by the organization. Meanwhile, among other things, the work environment variable has a direct effect on loyalty, as does the self-reward variable. Employee work loyalty is increased by a positive work environment and self-reward.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Astuti, R., & Iverizkinawati. (2018). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan pada PT. Sarana Agro Nusantara Medan. Jurnal Ilman, 6(1).
     Google Scholar
  2. Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
     Google Scholar
  3. Hopper, E. (2020). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Explained. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from: https://www.thoughtco.com/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-4582571.
     Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Johnson, M. W. (2015). Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.110.
     Google Scholar
  5. Kountur, R., Djohanputro, B., & Sari, M. R. (2021). Past performance and earning management: The moderating effect of employee relative earning. Accounting, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.11.018
     Google Scholar
  6. Kumpikaite, V. (2008). Human resource development in learning organization. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.25-31.
     Google Scholar
  7. Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., & Alnaser, A. (2020). The impact of employee satisfaction on customer satisfaction: Theoretical and empirical underpinning. Management Science Letters, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.038.
     Google Scholar
  8. Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2016). Human Resource Management: Personnel Human Resource Management. Harvard Business Review, 13(January).
     Google Scholar
  9. Mulyati, V. Y., & Cicih, R. (2017). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Stress Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja dan Berimplikasi Pada Kinerja Karyawan Studi (Devisi Home Service) Pada PT. Telkom Indonesia Tbk Wilayah Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Manajemen FE-UB, 5(2).
     Google Scholar
  10. Prayitno, E., Ratnasih, C., & Astuty, P. (2022). The Effect of Organizational Culture, Career Development and Competence in the Pandemic Era on Job Satisfaction Its Implications on Employee Performance at PT Wijaya Karya Rekaya Konstruksi. Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30, 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315835.
     Google Scholar
  11. Ratnasih, C. (2017). Leadership Style, Discipline, Motivation and the Implications on Teachers Performance. IJHCM (International Journal of Human Capital Management), 1(01). https://doi.org/10.21009/ijhcm.01.01.10.
     Google Scholar
  12. Robbins, S. P. (2003). Essentials of Organizational Behavior (7th Edition). In Prentice Hall.
     Google Scholar
  13. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Essentials of Organizational Behaviour. In Pearson.
     Google Scholar
  14. Roelen, C. A. M., Koopmans, P. C., & Groothoff, J. W. (2008). Which work factors determine job satisfaction? Work, 30(4).
     Google Scholar
  15. Roelen, C. A. M., Koopmans, P. C., Notenbomer, A., & Groothoff, J. W. (2008). Job satisfaction and sickness absence: A questionnaire survey. Occupational Medicine, 58(8). DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqn113.
     Google Scholar
  16. Sedarmayanti. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama. In Refika Aditama.
     Google Scholar
  17. Sugiyono. (2016). Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian. Uji Validitas.
     Google Scholar
  18. Sugiyono. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. In Alfabeta.
     Google Scholar
  19. Tewal, B., Tangkuman, K., & Trang, I. (2015). Penilaian Kinerja, Reward, Dan Punishment Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Pt. Pertamina (Persero). Jurnal EMBA, 3(2).
     Google Scholar
  20. Tremblay, L. M. (1958). Human Relations in Business, bv Keith Davis, N.Y., McGraw-Hill, 1957, pp. 547. Relations Industrielles, 13(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.7202/1022483ar.
     Google Scholar
  21. Virginia, Y. M., & Ratnasih, C. (2017). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Dan Berimplikasi Pada Kinerja Karyawan. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9).
     Google Scholar