•   Saleem Ahmed

  •   Muhammad Asim

  •   Salman Manzoor


The study aims to evaluate how the supplier commitment, supplier attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and supplier trust are influenced by service quality, communication quality and time management quality. 157 responses were collected from the target population consisting of manufacturing firms of Karachi. Sampling technique included the purposive sampling technique and data was analyzed using PLS-SEM. The study found that supplier satisfaction was positively and significantly impacting supplier attraction, supplier commitment and supplier trust while it was also positively and significantly impacted by communication quality, service quality and time management quality. The study has several recommendations for the managers on the basis of the results of the data analysis. The managers are recommended to focus on the various antecedents of quality as they help in enhancing the supplier satisfaction as the study also found that supplier satisfaction was essential in improving the supplier attractiveness, supplier trust and supplier commitment. By improving the communication, service and time management quality, the manufacturing firms can significantly boost their relationship with the suppliers and enhance their performance.

Keywords: Supplier commitment, supplier trust, supplier attractiveness, supplier satisfaction, quality.


Busacca, B., & Padula, G. Understanding the relationship between attribute performance and overall satisfaction: Theory, measurement and implications. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(6), 543-561, year 2005.

Dalvi, M.V., & Kant, R. Benefits, criteria and activities of supplier development: A categorical literature review. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(4), 653-675 year 2015.

Fischer, M. Antecedents and benefits of supplier satisfaction and the influence of segmentation and status on buyer-supplier relationships: A multi-perspective case study of company x and four of its suppliers. University of Twente, year 2017.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 382-388, year 1981.

Glas, A.H. The impact of procurement on supplier satisfaction: Service, communication, and speed. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 12(1-2), 90-117, year 2018.

Gomm, R. Social research methodology: A critical introduction: Macmillan International Higher Education, year 2008.

Graziano, A.M., & Raulin, M.L. Research methods: A process of inquiry: HarperCollins College Publishers, year 1993.

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A.M. A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding statistics, 3(4), 283-297, year 2004.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem): Sage Publications, year 2016.

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. Pls-sem: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152, year 2011.

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1-2), 1-12, year 2013.

Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem) an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121, year 2014.

Hamali, S., Prihandoko, D., Kurniawan, S., & Ramdhani, R. The effects of supply chain information integration on organizational performance in food small industry. Management Science Letters, 10(3), 695-702, year 2020.

Hegenberg, J. A case study: Assessing the antecedents and benefits of supplier satisfaction. University of Twente, year 2017.

Hughes, J.A., & Sharrock, W.W. The philosophy of social research: Routledge, year 2016.

Huttinger, L. Preferential customer treatment by suppliers: Identifying benefits and antecedents, year 2014.

Koenders, S. Supplier satisfaction: The importance of achieving excellence as a buying company to create satisfied suppliers. University of Twente, year 2016.

Kothari, C.R. Research methodology: Methods and techniques: New Age International, year 2004.

Koul, L. Methodology of educational research: Vikas publishing house PVT Ltd, year 2009.

Kumar, S., & Phrommathed, P. Research methodology: Springer, year 2005.

Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. What is research. practical research: planning and design, year 2010.

Leenders, M.R., Nollet, J., & Ellram, L.M. Adapting purchasing to supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(1), 40-42, year 1994.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S.M. Second language research: Methodology and design: Routledge, year 2015.

Makkonen, H., Vuori, M., & Puranen, M. Buyer attractiveness as a catalyst for buyer–supplier relationshipdevelopment. Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 156-168, year 2016.

Malhotra, N., & Birks, D. Marketing research: An applied perspective. Harlow: Prentice Hall, year 2006.

Meena, P.L., Sarmah, S.P., & Sinha, S. Measuring satisfaction in buyer-supplier relationship from suppliers perspective. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 4(1), 60-74, year 2012.

Miao, Y., Du, R., Li, J., & Westland, J.C. A two-sided matching model in the context of b2b export cross-border e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 841-861, year 2019.

Patrucco, A.S., Luzzini, D., Moretto, A., & Ronchi, S. Attraction in buyer–supplier relationships: Improving supply network performance through purchasing recognition and proficient collaboration initiatives. Business Process Management Journal, 25(2), 347-367, year 2019

Paul, W.T., Semeijn, J., & Ernstson, S. Supplier satisfaction and commitment: The role of influence strategies and supplier development. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16(1), 17-26, year 2010

Pulles, N.J., Schiele, H., Veldman, J., & Hüttinger, L. The impact of customer attractiveness and supplier satisfaction on becoming a preferred customer. Industrial marketing management, 54, 129-140, year 2016

Schiele, H., Ellis, S.C., Eßig, M., Henke, J.W., & Kull, T.J. Managing supplier satisfaction: Social capital and resource dependence frameworks. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 23(2), 132-138, year 2015.

Shanka, M.S., & Buvik, A. When does relational exchange matters? Social bond, trust and satisfaction. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 26(1), 57-74, year 2019

Shub, A.N., & Stonebraker, P.W. The human impact on supply chains: Evaluating the importance of “soft” areas on integration and performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(1), 31-40, year 2009

Tanskanen, K., & Aminoff, A. Buyer and supplier attractiveness in a strategic relationship—a dyadic multiple-case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 128-141, year 2015.

Tchokogué, A., Nollet, J., & Robineau, J. Supply's strategic contribution: An empirical reality. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(2), 105-122, year 2017.

Tormöhlen, F. Improving a buyer's standing at its supplier: An investigation of relationship changing episodes. University of Twente, year 2019.

Veen, I. The effect of different types of trust and commitment on supplier satisfaction. University of Twente, year 2018.

Wong, C., Skipworth, H., Godsell, J., & Achimugu, N. Towards a theory of supply chain alignment enablers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 419-437, year 2012.


Download data is not yet available.


How to Cite
Ahmed, S., Asim, M., & Manzoor, S. (2020). The Determinants and Outcomes of Supplier Satisfaction. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.1.189