Dynamics Between Social Tie Strength, Customer Involvement and E-Commerce Value Co-Creation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The advantage to conceptualize value together with the firm’s customers has been documented to be one that differentiates the future of any enterprise. This challenges companies to engage their customers to participate in the value co-creation process. In consonance with the service-dominant logic, human interactions play a critical role in defining and concretizing the future of an enterprise. Strong ties need to be present for value co-creation to work. The concept of social tie strength, which was originally postulated by Granovetter (1973), encapsulates observed behaviors that define the intensity of social ties that exist between the company and its customers. Through Structural Equation Modelling, the researchers examined the dynamics of the relationship that exists between social tie strength and value co-creation. It further analyzes the role of customer involvement as a mediator to these two main concepts. The research tries to understand if customer involvement amplifies the effect of social tie strength in the value co-creation process. As traditional commerce migrates online, the tendency of companies is to automate things which predominantly were human touchpoints. The researchers emphatically believes that there are certain touchpoints that should not be left automated as this will eradicate the company’s opportunities to work with their customers. Even if AI tools such as chatbots are becoming more efficient, the human aspect in any business transaction cannot be undermined. This claim was validated by the research findings that social tie strength relates to value co-creation and this relationship is positively mediated by customer involvement.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
-
Aghdam, A. R. (2020). Improving the theoretical understanding toward patient-driven health care innovation through online value cocreation: systematic review. Journal of Med. Internet Research.
Google Scholar
1
-
Allen, T. (1966). Managing the Flow of Scientific and Technological Information. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar
2
-
Alves, H. F. (2016). Value co-creation: concept and contexts of application and study. Journal of Business Research.
Google Scholar
3
-
Anning-Dorson, T. (2018). Customer involvement capability and service firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Business Research, 269-280.
Google Scholar
4
-
Barreto, A. M. (2019). The Impact of Involvement on Engagement with Brand Posts. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.
Google Scholar
5
-
Barthi, K., & Agrawal, R. (2018). High Customer Involvement: An essential element in the co-creation process. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 431-444.
Google Scholar
6
-
Bharti, K. A. (2015). Value co-creation. Literature review and proposed conceptual framework. International Journal of Marketing.
Google Scholar
7
-
Boomsma, A. (1982). Robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In (Joreskog KG, Wold H, Eds.). Systems under indirection observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Part I). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
Google Scholar
8
-
Brandao, M., & Moro, M. (2015). Analyzing the strength of co-authorship ties with neighborhood interlap. International Conference on Web Intelligence, (pp. 527-542).
Google Scholar
9
-
Campos, A. C. (2016). Co-creation of tourist experiences: a literature review. Journal on Current Issues.
Google Scholar
10
-
Grönroos, P. V. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4(2), 133-150.
Google Scholar
11
-
Chacoff, N. P., Resasco, J., & Vázquez, D. P. (2017). Interaction frequency, network position, and the temporal persistence of interactions in a plant–pollinator network. Ecological Society of America.
Google Scholar
12
-
Chang, C. (2013). Examining user's intention to continue using social network games: A flow Experience. Telematics and Informatics.
Google Scholar
13
-
Chang-Hua, Y., Teng, H. Y., & Tzeng, J. C. (2019). Innovativeness and customer value co-creation behaviors: Mediating role of customer engagement. Department of Leisure and Recreation Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology.
Google Scholar
14
-
Cheung, M., & To, W. M. (2021). he effects of customer involvement on perceived service performance and word-of-mouth: the mediating role of service co-creation. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Statistics.
Google Scholar
15
-
Chou, C., & Bentler, PM. (1983). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research.
Google Scholar
16
-
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Hillsdale.
Google Scholar
17
-
Cui, A. (2016). The Impact of Customer Involvement on New Product Development: Contingent and Substitutive Effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
Google Scholar
18
-
Dissing, A. S. (2018). Measuring social integration and tie strength with smartphone and survey data. PLos One.
Google Scholar
19
-
Erogly, S., K.A., M., & Davis, L. (2003). Empirical Testing of a Model of Online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology Mark.
Google Scholar
20
-
Esmaeili, L., & G., S. A. (2019). A systematic review on social commerce. Journal of Strategic Marketing.
Google Scholar
21
-
Fan, X., & Luo, Y. (2020). Value Co-Creation: A Literature Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences.
Google Scholar
22
-
Fisher, A., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Getting it wrong’, The Power of Customer Misbehavior. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Google Scholar
23
-
Galvagno, M. A. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Management of Service Quality.
Google Scholar
24
-
Garson, D. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression and Structural Equation Models. NC, USA: Statistical Associates Publishing.
Google Scholar
25
-
Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K., & Sandvig, C. (2008). The Network in the Garden: An Empirical Analysis of Social Media in Rural Life. CHI.
Google Scholar
26
-
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Social Ties. American Journal of Sociology.
Google Scholar
27
-
Granovetter, M. (2013). The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology.
Google Scholar
28
-
Greenhalgh, T. J. (2016). Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. . Milbank Quarterly.
Google Scholar
29
-
Grönroos, C. (2012). Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management.
Google Scholar
30
-
Grönroos, C., Strandvik, T., & Heinonen, K. (2015). Value Co-Creation: Critical Reflections. Helsinki, Finland: Hanken School of Economics.
Google Scholar
31
-
He, Y. Z. (2012). Principle Features for Tie Strength Estimation in Micro-Blog Social Network. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology.
Google Scholar
32
-
Hinson, R., Boateng, H., Renner, A., & Kosiba, J. P. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of customer engagement on Facebook: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.
Google Scholar
33
-
Hu, Y. (2012). The moderating effect of brand equity and the mediating effect of marketing mix strategy on the relationship between service quality and customer loyalty: The case of retail chain stores in Taiwan. International Journal of Organizational Innovation.
Google Scholar
34
-
Huang, E. (2012). Online Experiences and Virtual Goods Purchase Intention. Internet Research.
Google Scholar
35
-
IBM. (2015). IBM SPPS. Retrieved from https://tandfbis.s3.amazonaws.com/rt-media/pdf/9781848729995/IBM_SPSS_5e_Chapter_4.pdf
Google Scholar
36
-
International Trade Administration. (2021, September 11). About Us: International Trade Administration. Retrieved from trade.gov.us: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/philippines-ecommerce
Google Scholar
37
-
Kang, K., Lu, J., Guo, L., & Li, W. (2021). The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms,. International Journal of Information Management, Vol 56.
Google Scholar
38
-
Kim, T. H.-J., Gligor, Virgil, G. J., Jason, H., & Perrig, A. (2021). Soulmate of Acquaintance? Visualizing Tie Strength for Trust Interference. Bosch Research and Technology Center.
Google Scholar
39
-
Kim, Y. &. (2018). Tie Strength and Value Creation in the Buyer-Supplier Context: A U-Shaped Relation Moderated by Dependence Asymmetry. Journal of Management, 1029-1064.
Google Scholar
40
-
Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing Marketing to Manage the Environmental Imperative. Journal of Marketing, 132-135.
Google Scholar
41
-
Koo, D.-M. (2016). Impact of tie strength and experience on the effectiveness of online service recommendations. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl, 15, 38–51.
Google Scholar
42
-
Leclercq, T. H. (2016). en years of value cocreation: an integrative review. Rech. of Applied Marketing.
Google Scholar
43
-
Lewis, K. K. (2008). Tastes, Ties, and Time: A New Social Network Dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks.
Google Scholar
44
-
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., & Feng, T. (2020). The impacts of customer involvement on the relationship between relationship quality and performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(2), 270-283.
Google Scholar
45
-
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., & Feng, T. (2020). The impacts of customer involvement on the relationship between relationship quality and performance. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing.
Google Scholar
46
-
Luarn, P. &. (2015). Key Variables to Predict Tie Strength. Internet Search.
Google Scholar
47
-
Ma, L., Wang, Z. Z., & Gaoshan. (2020). How Social Ties Influence Customers' Involvement and Online Purchase Intentions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 396-408.
Google Scholar
48
-
Ma, L., Zhang, X., Ding, X., & Wang, G. (2020). How Social Ties Influence Customer's involvement and online Purchase Intentions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research.
Google Scholar
49
-
Martin, J., Mortimer, G., & Andrews, L. (2015). Re-examining Online Customer Experience to Include Purchase Frequency and Perceived Risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81-95.
Google Scholar
50
-
Mattie, H., Engø-Monsen, K., & L. R. (2022). Understanding tie strength in social networks using a local “bow tie” framework. Scientific Reports.
Google Scholar
51
-
Mattie, H., Engo-Monsen, K., Ling, R., & Jukka-Pekka, O. (2018). Understanding tie strength in social networks using a local framework. Scientifc Reports.
Google Scholar
52
-
Molinillo, S., Garcia, N., Sanchez, A., & Japutra, A. (2020). The Impact of Affective and Cognitive App Experiences on Loyalty towards Retailers. Jornal of Retail and Consumer Services.
Google Scholar
53
-
Msallati, A. (2021). Investigating the nexus between the types of advertising messages and customer engagement: Do customer involvement and generations matter? Journal of Innovations in Digital Marketing, 1-13.
Google Scholar
54
-
Nangpiire, C., Silva, J., & Alves, H. (2021). customer engagement and value co-creation/destruction: the internal fostering and hindering factors and actors in the tourist/hotel experience. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.
Google Scholar
55
-
Netemeyer, R. e. (2003). Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. California, USA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
56
-
Nicola, C. G. (2019). Value co-creation and co-production in the interaction between citizens and public administration: a systematic literature review. Kybernetes.
Google Scholar
57
-
Nielsen-Norman Group. (2022). About Us: Nn/G. Retrieved from Nielsen Norman Group: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/frequency-recency/
Google Scholar
58
-
Nowell, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2007). The Link-Prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1019-1031.
Google Scholar
59
-
Olsen, S. (2014). Repurchase Loyalty: The Role of Involvement and Satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing.
Google Scholar
60
-
Ooesthoek, A. (2013). What is the Impact of Facebook Tie Strength and Behavior on Purchase Intention.
Google Scholar
61
-
Pappalardo, L., Rosetti, G., & Pedreschi, D. (2012). How well do we know each other: Detecting Tie Strength in Multidimensional Networks. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.
Google Scholar
62
-
Pfitzer, M. B. (2013). Innovating for Shared Value. Harvard Business Review.
Google Scholar
63
-
Plaza, M., Burke, T., & Cox, T. (2020). repeatable Social Network Node-Based Metrics Across Populations and Contexts in a Passerine. Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
Google Scholar
64
-
Prahalad, C. K. (2014). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 5–14.
Google Scholar
65
-
Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-Creation Experiences: The Next Generation in Value Creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing.
Google Scholar
66
-
Priharsari, D. A. (n.d.). Value co-creation in firm sponsored online communities: what enables, constrains, and shapes value. Internet Research Journal.
Google Scholar
67
-
Ramirez, M. S.-P. (2018). Co-Creation and Open Innovation:. Communicar.
Google Scholar
68
-
Ramirez, M. S.-P. (2018). Co-Creation and Open Innovation: Systematic Literature Review. Communicate.
Google Scholar
69
-
Ramirez, M. S.-P. (2020). Co-Creation and Open Innovation:. Communicar.
Google Scholar
70
-
Ranjan, K. R. (2014). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
Google Scholar
71
-
Rhan, M. (2021). the analysis factor. Retrieved from theanalysisfactor.com: https://www.theanalysisfactor.com/factor-analysis-5/
Google Scholar
72
-
Rozzell, B., Piercy, C. W., Carr, C. T., King, S., Lane, B. L., Tornes, M., Wright, K. B. (2014). Notification pending: Online social support from close and nonclose relational ties via Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 272–280.
Google Scholar
73
-
Saha, V. M. (2020). Emerging trends in the literature of value co-creation: a bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking International Journal.
Google Scholar
74
-
Samoszuk, S. (2016). Consumer Involvement in the Decision-Making Process. Retrieved from study.com: https://study.com/academy/lesson/consumer-involvement-in-the-decision-making-process.html.
Google Scholar
75
-
Sarstedt, M. R. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Springer.
Google Scholar
76
-
Satar, N. S., Dastane, O., & Ma’arif, M. Y. (2019). Customer Value Proposition for E-Commerce: A Case Study Approach. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(2), 454-458.
Google Scholar
77
-
Shi, S., Wang, Y., Chen, X., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Conceptualization of omnichannel customer experience and its impact on shopping intention: A mixed method approach. International Journal on Information Management, 50, 325-336.
Google Scholar
78
-
Silva, T. M. (2019). Building relationships through customer engagement in Facebook brand pages. Marketing Intelligence & Planning.
Google Scholar
79
-
Skute, I. Z.-K.-N. (2019). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations. Journal of Technology Transfer.
Google Scholar
80
-
Taylor, S., & Hunter, G. (2015). Best Buy and Showrooming: A Critical Thinking Case Exercise Based upon Service Dominant Logic and Value Co-creation. Journal of Creating Value, 256-274.
Google Scholar
81
-
Team, C. (2022, December 5). Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Retrieved from https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/about-cfi/: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/data-science/variance-inflation-factor-vif/
Google Scholar
82
-
Thomas, L. J., Brooks, S., & McGouran, C. (2020). Antecedents of Value Co-creation Activities for Online Fashion Brands. Journal of Interactive Marketing.
Google Scholar
83
-
Torres, T. P. (2015, March 10). 9 out of 10 Pinoys Prefer Online Shopping. The Manila Star.
Google Scholar
84
-
Tregua, M. D. (2020). #10yearschallenge: how co-creation permeated tourism research. A bibliometric analysis. European Journal on Tourism.
Google Scholar
85
-
Valverde-Rebaza, J., Roche, M., Poncelet, P., & de Andrade Lopes, A. (2018). The role of location and social strength for friendship prediction in location-based social networks. Information Processing Management, Elsevier., 475-489.
Google Scholar
86
-
Voorberg, W. H. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review.
Google Scholar
87
-
Weise, J., Min, J.-K., Hing, J., & Zimmerman, J. (n.d.). Assessing Calls and SMS logs as indicators of Tie Strength.
Google Scholar
88
-
Wellman, B. &. (1990). Different Strokes for Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology.
Google Scholar
89
-
Wickham, H. J. (2022). Read Rectangular Text Data. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readr.
Google Scholar
90
-
Xiang, R. N. (2010). Modelling Relationship Strengths in Social Networks. 19th International Conference on the World Wide Web.
Google Scholar
91
-
Xiong, L., Lei, Y., Huang, W., Huang, X., & Zhong, M. (2016). An estimation model for social relationship strength based on user profiles, co-occurence and interaction activities. Neurocomputing, 927-934.
Google Scholar
92
-
Yang, H. (2020). About us: SAGE Research Methods. Retrieved from sagepub.com: https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/encyc-of-research-regression%20coefficients%2C%20or%20regression%20weights.
Google Scholar
93
-
Yi, Y. &. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior. Journal of Business Research, 1279-1284.
Google Scholar
94
-
Yuan, F., Yufang, J., Dong, D. (2021). The Influence of Context fn Value Proposition Co-Creation of Online Shopping Platforms in China. FEMIB 2021. Dalian: School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology.
Google Scholar
95
-
Zadeh, A., Zolfagharian, M. A., & Hifacher, C. (2019). Customer Value Co-Creation in Social Media. Conceptualization and Antecedents. Journal of Strategic Marketing.
Google Scholar
96