The Impact of Financial Ratios on Bank Performance Before and During COVID-19: Evidence from Bank Business Activities Category 3 and 4 in Indonesia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Keeping in mind the year 2020 until the end of 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic turmoil shocked banking sectors. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruptions to economies across the globe, and Indonesia is no exception. As a result, the banking sector in Indonesia has been particularly affected. This research aims to investigate the banking situation in Indonesia during COVID-19 and how it has affected bank profitability (ROA). Profitability is a ratio that measures the company's ability to generate profits. Return on Assets (ROA) is one of the profitability ratios. Return on assets (ROA) is a commonly used financial ratio that measures a company's profitability. For this research, the dependent variable is return on asset to measure bank profitability. The independent variables are non-performing loan, net interest margin, operating expense to operating income, loan-to-deposit ratio, and capital adequacy ratio. This research also uses control variables. The control variables in this research are bank size, GDP growth, inflation, and interest rates. Since this research also aims to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on banks' profitability. The covid-19 pandemic is also an independent variable used as a dummy. The sample used in this research are commercial banks business activity category 3 and 4. The methodology of this research utilises panel data and a two-step system GMM. Thus, this research has discovered that COVID-19 affected ROA negatively and significantly. Additionally, the financial ratios that affected ROA are NIM and OEOI.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
-
Titko, J., Skvarciany, V., & Jurevičienė, D. (2015). Drivers of bank profitability: Case of Latvia and Lithuania. Intellectual Economics, 120-129.
Google Scholar
1
-
Arellano, M. (2003). Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
2
-
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. doi:10.2307/2297968
Google Scholar
3
-
Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Google Scholar
4
-
Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Department of Economics and The Center for Policy Research.
Google Scholar
5
-
Banto, J. M., & Monsia, A. F. (2021, February). Microfinance institutions, banking, growth and transmission channel: A GMM panel data analysis from developing countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 79, 126-150. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2020.06.004
Google Scholar
6
-
Beck, T., Jonghe, O. D., & Schepens, G. (2013). Bank competition and stability: Cross-country. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 218-244.
Google Scholar
7
-
Berger, A. (1995). The Profit-Structure Relationship in Banking--Tests of Market-Power and Efficient-Structure Hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 404-31.
Google Scholar
8
-
Biørn, E. (2016). Econometrics of Panel Data: Methods and Applications. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198753445.001.0001
Google Scholar
9
-
Bouzgarrou, H., Jouida, S., & Louhichi, W. (2018, April). Bank profitability during and before the financial crisis: Domestic versus foreign banks. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 26-39. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.05.011
Google Scholar
10
-
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2015). Fundamentals of Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar
11
-
Damayanti, A. C. (2022). Pengaruh Ukuran Bank (size), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non- Performing Loans (NPL), Diversifikasi Pendapatan, Loans to Deposit Ratio (LDR), dan Biaya Operasional dan Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO) Terhadap Kinerja Bank di Indonesia. Diponogor Journal of Management, 11, 7.
Google Scholar
12
-
Delen, D., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2013). Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 3970-3983.
Google Scholar
13
-
Flamini, V., McDonald, C., & Schumacher, L. (2009). The Determinants of Commercial Bank. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 1-32.
Google Scholar
14
-
García-Herrero, A., Gavilá, S., & Santabárbara, D. (2009). What explains the low profitability of Chinese banks? Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(11), 2080-2092. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.05.005
Google Scholar
15
-
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Google Scholar
16
-
Hoyle, K. (2014). Money and Banking: Made Simple. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-434-98505-0.50006
Google Scholar
17
-
Hwang, J., & Sun, Y. (2018). Should we go one step further? An accurate comparison of one-step and two-step procedures in a generalized method of moments framework. Journal of Econometrics, 381-405.
Google Scholar
18
-
Lee, J. Y., & Kim, D. (2013). Bank performance and its determinants in Korea. Japan and the World Economy, 27, 83-94. doi:10.1016/j.japwor.2013.05.001
Google Scholar
19
-
Mandala, G. S. (2001). Introduction to Econometrics, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
20
-
Naceur, S. B. (2003). The Determinants of the Tunisian Banking Industry Profitability: Panel Evidence. Semantic Scholar, 1-17.
Google Scholar
21
-
Naili, M., & Lahrichi, Y. (2022). Banks’ credit risk, systematic determinants and specific factors: recent evidence from emerging markets. Heliyon, 1-16.
Google Scholar
22
-
Nielsen, B. B., & Raswant, A. (2018). The selection, use, and reporting of control variables in international business research: A review and recommendation. Journal of World Business, 958-968. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2018.05.003
Google Scholar
23
-
Poniman , P. (2022). Dampak CAMEL Terhadap Profitabilitas Perbankan yang Listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Measurement Jurnal Akuntansi. doi:10.33373/mja.v16i2.4721
Google Scholar
24
-
Rehman, A. U., Iqbal, A., & Aslam, E. (2022). Intellectual capital efficiency and bank performance: Evidence from islamic banks. Borsa Istanbul Review, 113-121.
Google Scholar
25
-
Rivai, V., Veithzal, A. P., & Idroes, F. N. (2007). Bank and financial institution management: conventional and sharia system. PT Radja Grafindo Persada.
Google Scholar
26
-
Rohman, A., Nurkhin, A., Mukhibad, H., Kusumantoro, & Wolor, C. W. (2022). Determinants of Indonesian banking profitability: Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic analysis. Banks and Bank Systems, 37-46. doi:10.21511/bbs.17(2).2022.04
Google Scholar
27
-
Rosandy, N., & Sha, T. L. (2022). Pengaruh CAR, NIM, LDR, dan BOPO Terhadap ROA Pada Perbankan di BEI. Jurnal Multiparadigma Akuntansi.
Google Scholar
28
-
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th Edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Google Scholar
29
-
Somashekar, N. (2009). Banking. New Delhi: New Age International.
Google Scholar
30
-
Tan, Y. (2016, January). The impacts of risk and competition on bank profitability in China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 40, 85-110. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2015.09.003
Google Scholar
31
-
Tsiapa, M. (2022). Performance of large firms in Greece during the unstable period of 2011-2016: lessosn from the weak parts of Europe. European Journal of Management, 31(1), 94-114. doi:10.1108/EJMBE-06-2019-0109
Google Scholar
32
-
Wooldridge, J. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
33
-
Wu, J., Yao, Y., Chen, M., & Jeon, B. N. (2021, December). Does economic uncertainty affect the soundness of banks? Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Journal of Asian Economics, 77, 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101394
Google Scholar
34