Project Investment Analysis on New Oil and Gas Field Development (M-X) at Pt. PTM



Abstract Views
202

Downloads
742

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted May 17, 2023
Published Aug 8, 2023
10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.4.2001

Abstract viewed = 202 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

PT.PTM as one of major oil and gas company in Indonesia contributes highly to fulfilling oil and gas demand in Indonesia. However, with more than 40 years of operation, PT. PTM is currently at its declining phase. Aggressive development projects have been planned to sustain PT. PTM production. The latest development project is M-X new field developments.

This Final Project is intended to assess the M-X Project feasibility in terms of economic terms considering possible dynamic changes in several factors. The results of this final project will help PT.PTM management decide whether to invest in the development of the M-X field. Both Discounted and Non-Discounted Cash Flow (DCF and Non DCF) will be used in the M-X Project investment analysis. Revenue and cost breakdown will follow Production Sharing Contract (PSC) – Cost Recovery scheme as applied for PT. PTM. The Non-DCF analysis shows that 264.65 MMUSD net cash flow will be generated for the Government due to M-X development while PT. PTM will gain 49.97 MMUSD with payback period of 3 years after M-X production. DCF analysis result shows that Project Net Present Value (NPV) is 4.35 MMUSD with an IRR of 12%. Financial risk due to dynamic changes in oil and gas project is analyzed using Montecarlo simulation that resulted on 23.3% probability to have negative NPV with Mean NPV of 13.93 MMUSD. The analysis result from Non-DCF and DCF method shows positive result for PT. PTM management to proceed with investment planning for M-X field development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Damodaran website (2023, March 25). Damodaran cost of equity and capital (US). https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.html.
     Google Scholar
  2. Damodaran website (2023, March 25). Damodaran country default spreads and risk premiums.
     Google Scholar
  3. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html.
     Google Scholar
  4. Damodaran website (2023, March 25). Damodaran total betas by sector (for computing private company costs of equity) – US. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/totalbeta.html.
     Google Scholar
  5. Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2012). Principles of managerial finance: brief. 13th ed. Prentice Hall.
     Google Scholar
  6. Kengatharan, L. (2016). Capital budgeting theory and practice: A review and agenda for future research. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(1). www.iiste.org.
     Google Scholar
  7. Planton, V., & Constantinescu, A. (2014). Monte Carlo method in risk analysis for investment projects. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 393–400.
     Google Scholar
  8. Primasari, Indah. (2022). Project investment plan valuation using discounted cash flow analysis (Case study of LLP compression project investment plan at Tango Field, Mehacca Block). European Journal of Business and Management Research, VOL7(ISSUE4), 342-348. DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.4.1596.
     Google Scholar
  9. Ratman, D. I. (2018). Gas Field Development alternatives evaluation using real options – cas in production sharing contract in Indonesia [Unpublished thesis]. Bandung Institute of Technology.
     Google Scholar
  10. Rothaermel, F. T. (2021). Strategic management. 5th ed. Mcgraw-Hill Education.
     Google Scholar
  11. Smit, H. T. J, & Ankum, L.A. (1993). A real options and game-theoretic approach to corporate investment strategy under competition. Financial Management, 22(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665941.
     Google Scholar
  12. Ye, S., & Tiong, R. L. K. (2000). NPV-AT-RISK Method in infrastructure project investment evaluation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, VOL126(ISSUE3), 227–233.
     Google Scholar