Improvement of Turnaround Maintenance Project Execution Through Long-Term Specific Contracting Strategy (A Case Study: Gas Processing Plant in Indonesia)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Turnaround is crucial in maintaining reliability and ensuring the safety of the production operation facility in Central Processing Plant "CPP Senoro of JOB Tomori, as well as in minimizing downtime and Loss of Production Opportunity (LPO), which impact the performance and commitment of the Company to all stakeholders. For this reason, an improvement in total time utilization in the third Turnaround in 2024 is a significant concern. The researchers conducted qualitative research through interviews with several key personnel in the organization as respondents to comprehend the overall complexities of the TAR Project, which often occurred while carrying out the execution, because they might lead to failure to optimize the utilization of the total time (shutdown). Researchers also evaluate how the preferred contract strategy can be an alternative solution to minimize those constraints. This research aims to provide alternative solutions and recommendations to Company to optimize the total time (shutdown) utilization through a specific long-term contract strategy. The research considers specific long-term "incumbent" contracts as an alternative solution and the most suitable contract strategy to execute the third turnaround project in 2024.
Downloads
References
-
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Ed. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Google Scholar
1
-
Duffuaa S. & Daya, A.B. (2004). Turnaround maintenance in the Petrochemical industry: practices and suggested improvements. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10(3), 184-190.
Google Scholar
2
-
Ertl, B. (2005). Applying PMBOK to shutdowns, turnarounds and outages inter plan systems inc. Republished with permission (Plant et al. Centre) Revised. Available at: http://www.plant-maintenance.com/articles/ApplvingPMBOKtoShutdowns.shtml.
Google Scholar
3
-
Lenahan, T. (1999). Turnaround management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Google Scholar
4
-
Lenahan, T. (2006). Turnaround, shutdown and outage management: effective planning and step-by-step execution of planned maintenance operations. Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
Google Scholar
5
-
Levitt, J. (2004). Managing maintenance shutdowns and outages. Industrial Press Inc.
Google Scholar
6
-
MPCP BP Project Guideline (2006). Procurement & contracting strategy.
Google Scholar
7
-
Nooteboom, Uri. "Interface Management Improves On-Time, On-Budget Delivery of Megaprojects." J Pet Technol, 56(2004), 32–34. https://doi.org/10.2118/0804-0032-JPT.
Google Scholar
8
-
Obiajunwa, C. C. (2010). A Framework for the successful implementation of turnaround maintenance projects. ProQuest LLC.
Google Scholar
9
-
Project Management Institute (2017). A Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). 6th ed. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Google Scholar
10
-
Piantanida, M., Cognigni, G., Mancarella, M., & Gaudioso, G. (2014). Managing the complexity of engineering interfaces through collaboration. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—EMEA, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Google Scholar
11
-
SSK Migas PTK 041 (2021). The working guidelines about maintenance of oil and gas production facilities in Indonesia.
Google Scholar
12
-
SKK Migas PTK 007 revisi 5 (2023). Guideline on implementation of goods /services procurement for all oil and gas industry ‘KKKS” in Indonesia.
Google Scholar
13
-
Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Inc.
Google Scholar
14
-
TAR Project Document., (2018). TAR Project Lesson Learned (2018) document.
Google Scholar
15
-
TAR Project Document. (2021). TAR Project Lesson Learned (2021) document.
Google Scholar
16
-
Tobin, P. (2018). Interface risks – What they are and why you should care. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=837641c3-d4f3-43de-b0a0-ba4cc890a20f.
Google Scholar
17
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Moh. Nur Muhadi,
Gatot Yudoko,
Root Cause Analysis of Project Delay in BGC-TEG Project , European Journal of Business and Management Research: Vol. 6 No. 6 (2021) -
Desi Aresa Mahdi,
Gatot Yudoko,
Agung Wicaksono,
Debottlenecking The Complexities of Stakeholder Management in Indonesia Offshore Platform Decommissioning , European Journal of Business and Management Research: Vol. 8 No. 5 (2023) -
Rahardian A. Saputra,
Gatot Yudoko,
Aries F. Firman,
Proposed Strategy of Heavy Equipment Overhaul: Case Study of a Coal Mining Contractor in Indonesia , European Journal of Business and Management Research: Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023)