Proposed Improvement of Subcontractor Selection Process at PT Bangun Beton



Abstract Views
253

Downloads
299

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jun 22, 2023
Published Jul 27, 2023
10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.4.2055

Abstract viewed = 253 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

In construction, the main responsibility of PT Bangun Beton as the main contractor is to complete the project on time and with good quality according to the expectations of the project owner. However, companies often face late projects and results that do not meet targets. Therefore, the author wants to provide a solution to overcome this problem.

After conducting a situation analysis using Kepner Tregoe, it was found that one of the causes of delays was continuous work. If one job is not completed, then other work cannot be started so that the whole project is late. Subcontractors can be a contributing factor to this problem. Therefore, the authors use decision analysis as a plan of action.

This study uses the analysis of Risk Management and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Data collection methods used were questionnaires and focus group discussions (FGD). Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by considering the relevant criteria. The newly developed criteria are evaluated to determine which criteria need attention. AHP is used to sort these criteria.

The results showed that the criteria with the highest weight were Technical Ability, Quality, Performance History, Interpersonal Relations, HSE, Resources, Technological Innovation, and Financial Capability. These criteria can assist companies in prioritizing the selection of the right subcontractors. These criteria can also be used in the tender process and subcontractor evaluation.

By implementing this solution, it is expected that PT Bangun Beton can improve the timeliness and quality of project results. An effective subcontractor selection process will help address ongoing work issues and improve project execution efficiency.

Keywords: Analytical Hierarcy Process Kepner-Tregoe Analysis Risk Assessment Subcontractors Selection

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abbasianjahromi, H., Rajaie, H., & Shakeri, E. (2013). A framework for subcontractor selection in the construction industry. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.743922
     Google Scholar
  2. AS/NZS 4360:2004. (2004). Australian/New Zealand Standard Risk MAnagement. Australian Standards / New Zeland Standards 4360:2004.
     Google Scholar
  3. Deshmukh, A. J., & Chaudhari, A. A. (2011). A review for supplier selection criteria and methods. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 145 CCIS(1943), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20209-4_41
     Google Scholar
  4. Hermawan, P., & Sari, F. A. (2017). Backlog reduction in housing provision process using mixed approach of DMAIC, SMART and AHP methodologies. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 16(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2017.16.2.7
     Google Scholar
  5. Katz, T. L. S. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 26(6), 806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2014-0020
     Google Scholar
  6. Kyriazoglou, J., & Kyriazoglou, C. (2007). A Risk Management Standard.
     Google Scholar
  7. Markopoulos, E., Refflinghaus, J., Roell, M., & Vanharanta, H. (2022). Understanding situationality using the kepner-tregoe method in the company democracy model to increase employee engagement and knowledge contribution. Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 31, 196–207. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001522.
     Google Scholar
  8. Merna, T, & Al-Thani, F. (2008). Corporate Risk Management. 2nd ed. John Willi & Sons, Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  9. Saaty, T. L., & Hall, M. (2012). The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 175(July 2011), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_2.
     Google Scholar
  10. Singh, R. P., & Nachtnebel, H. P. (2016). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.138.
     Google Scholar
  11. Tan, Y., Xue, B., & Cheung, Y. T. (2017). Relationships between Main Contractors and Subcontractors and Their Impacts on Main Contractor Competitiveness: An Empirical Study in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001311.
     Google Scholar
  12. Yoke-lian, L., Hassim, S., Muniandy, R., & Teik-hua, L. (2012). 45. Review of Subcontracting Practice in CI 2012, 4(4), 16–19.
     Google Scholar