Adaptability, Acceptance and Resistance to Change of Local College Personnel in the Province of Batangas Philippines: Basis for Organizational Change Management Framework
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Change is indeed one of the struggles of any employee and company itself when there are changes in administration, leadership, and in-office occurs. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral adaptability in times of change are the three main facets of adaptability that are considered intrinsically related (Ashford and Taylor, 1990; Ployhart and Bliese, 2006; Van Dam, 2013). Marques (2016) concluded that acceptance grows as the changed situation loses its threats. Different dimensions are being distinguished such as open expressively, concealed, active, and passive support. Meanwhile, Rehman et al. (2021) mentioned that it is vital to shape the employees' resistive attitudes for the successful implementation of change, while their readiness greatly influences resistance (Banguntopo, 2018). The researchers further evaluated the personnel's adaptability, determined the personnel's acceptance, and assessed the personnel's resistance to change in local colleges. The researcher used descriptive-correlational research was valuable in providing facts that could form the basis of scientific judgment, which provided essential knowledge. The results revealed that the respondents displayed a high level of adaptability and acceptance, and strongly agreed to be resistant to change. Significant differences were observed in behavioral adaptability and openly expressive and passive support when grouped to position. Gen X group exhibited greater resistance to change in terms of behavioral response. Moreover, positive relationships among variables in different dimensions of change were identified as highly significant. The art of change allows organizations to ensure that new policies, procedures, and controls are adapted, accepted, and free from any form of resistance.
Downloads
References
-
Ahmad, A. B., and Cheng, Z. (2018). The role of change content, context, process, and leadership in understanding employees’ commitment to change: the case of public organizations in Kurdistan region of Iraq. Public Personnel Management. 47, 195–216. doi: 10.1177/0091026017753645.
Google Scholar
1
-
Augustsson, H., Richter, A., Hasson, H., & von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2017). The need for dual openness to change: a longitudinal study evaluating the impact of employees’ openness to organisational change content and process on intervention outcomes. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 0021886317691930.
Google Scholar
2
-
Banguntopo, U.S. (2018). The effect of leader member exchange to dimension of readiness for change. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen dan Ekonomi, 20(2), 30-37.
Google Scholar
3
-
Beus, J. M., Solomon, S. J., Taylor, E. C., & Esken, C. A. (2020). Making sense of climate: a meta-analytic extension of the competing values framework. Organizational Psychology Rev., 10, 136–168. doi: 10.1177/2041386620914707.
Google Scholar
4
-
Calarco, A. (2020). Adaptable leadership: what it takes to be a quick-change artist. center for creative leadership. white paper. education resources information center. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ED606779.pdf.
Google Scholar
5
-
Cox, L. (2019). Managing change and transition when you've been promoted. Retrieved on June 29, 2022 from https://www.ellevatenetwork.com/articles/6620-managing-change-and-transition-when-you-ve-been-promoted.
Google Scholar
6
-
Cullen, K.L., Edwards, B.D., Casper, W.C. and Gue, K.R. (2014). Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y.
Google Scholar
7
-
Di Fabio A and Gori A. (2016). Developing a new instrument for assessing acceptance of change. Frontier in Psychology,7, 802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00802. PMID: 27303356; PMCID: PMC4884749.
Google Scholar
8
-
Doney, C. (2022). How to fix employee resistance to change. Retrieved on January 18, 2023, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-fix-employee-resistance-change-cathryn-doney-1c.
Google Scholar
9
-
Drummond, K. E. and Reyes, A. M. (2018). Quantitative research design: experimental, quasi-experimental, and descriptive. Jones and Bartlett Learning. Retrieved on June 21, 2022, from http://www.csun.edu/ ~hbsoc126/soc4/chapter_6_outline.pdf.
Google Scholar
10
-
Errida, A. and Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 2021;13. doi:10.1177/18479790211016273.
Google Scholar
11
-
Eskreis-Winkler, L., & Fishbach, A. (2019). Not learning from failure—the greatest failure of all. Psychological Science, 30. 095679761988113. 10.1177/0956797619881133.
Google Scholar
12
-
Hagemann, M. (2021). How change adaptability helps in times of pandemic and can be enhanced in remote environment. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 10 (2021), 97–107.| https://www.doi.org/10.53615/2232-5697.10.97-107.
Google Scholar
13
-
Herrity, J. (2022). Important workplace adaptability skills. Retrieved on January 18, 2023 from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/adaptability-skills.
Google Scholar
14
-
Innocent, A. (2021). Change management: what it means to be adaptive. Retrieved from https://terraskills.com/change-management-what-it-means-to-be-adaptive/.
Google Scholar
15
-
Jackson, J. (2022). The ABC’s of resisting change. Retrieved on January 18, 2023 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jarretjackson/ 2022/08/17/the-abcs-of-resisting-change/.
Google Scholar
16
-
Jalagat, R.. (2016). The impact of change and change management in achieving corporate goals and objectives: organizational perspective. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5, 1233-1239.
Google Scholar
17
-
Johannsdottir, L., Olafsson, S. and Davidsdottir, B. (2015). Leadership role and employee acceptance of change: Implementing environmental sustainability strategies within Nordic insurance companies. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(1), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2013-0238.
Google Scholar
18
-
Koenen, A. K., Dochy, F., & Berghmans, I. (2015). A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 1-12.
Google Scholar
19
-
Kuligowski, K. (2022). Workplace Conflicts? Tips to Improve Communication. Retrieved from https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/ 8766-resolving-workplace-conflicts.html.
Google Scholar
20
-
Kunnari, I. (2018). Teachers changing higher education - from coping with change to embracing change. [PhD thesis, LonkaHäme University of Applied Sciences].
Google Scholar
21
-
Kuttappa, S. (2020). Cognitive flexibility: adapting to change as leaders. Retrieved on June 29, 2022 from https://shoury01.medium.com/cognitive-flexibility-adapting-to change-as-leaders-903419533951.
Google Scholar
22
-
Laszlo, C.A. (2004). Acceptance and adaptation — a personal journey. In: Suzuki, JI., Kobayashi, T., Koga, K. (eds) Hearing Impairment. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68397-1_15.
Google Scholar
23
-
Lugtu, R. (2019). Gen X most resistant to change? Retrieved on January 18, 2023 from https://hungryworkhorse.com/study-cases-philippines/gen-x-most-resistant-to-change/.
Google Scholar
24
-
Madison, F.arwell (2022). How leaders can emotionally support employees during change | use the change curve as a conversation canvas. Retrieved on December 20, 2022, from https://gofarwell.com/how-leaders-can-emotionally-support-employees-during-change-use-the-change-curve-as-a-conversation-canvas/.
Google Scholar
25
-
Malaysia Prime Minister Office (2015). Government transformation programme. Available from: http://www.pemandu.gov.my/gtp/About _GTP.
Google Scholar
26
-
Malik, Priyanka, (2021). How to adapt change in the workplace. Change Management. Retrieved on June 30, 2022. From https://whatfix.com/adapt-to-change/.
Google Scholar
27
-
Marques, J. (2016). Leadership: Finding balance between ambition and acceptance. Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data. Routledge Copyright. Available at: http://lccn.loc.gov/2016000872.
Google Scholar
28
-
McDuffee, S. (2022). Complacency in the workplace: A productivity killer. Retrieved on December 18, 2022, from https://www.teambonding.com/complacency-in-the-workplace/.
Google Scholar
29
-
Miller, J. L. (2017). Managing transitions: using william bridges’ transition model and a change style assessment instrument to inform strategies and measure progress in organizational change management. Scholarship and Professional Work. 74. https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/librarian _papers/74.
Google Scholar
30
-
Moorehouse, A. (2020). The importance of adaptability skills in the workplace. Training Journal. https://www.trainingjournal.com/ articles/features/importance-adaptability-skills-workplace.
Google Scholar
31
-
Neal, S. (2019). Generation X-Change: Don’t underestimate the powerful influence of Gen X Leaders. Retrieved on January 18, 2023 from https://media.ddiworld.com/research/global-leadership-forecast-2018_ddi_tr.pdf.
Google Scholar
32
-
Nejad, H.G., Nejad, F.G., & Farahani, T. (2021). Adaptability and Workplace Subjective Well-Being: The Effects of Meaning and Purpose on Young Workers in the Workplace. Canadian Journal of Career Development, 20(2), 4-16.
Google Scholar
33
-
Nova, V., & Hadiyan, S. (2017). Influence of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange towards readiness for change among employees of PT. Bank X. 2nd International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2017) (pp. 338-345). Atlantis Press.
Google Scholar
34
-
NtShangase, S. (2022). Change management for different generations. Retrieved on January 18, 2023 from https://changefolio.com/articles/ change-management-for-different-generations.
Google Scholar
35
-
Park, S., & Park, S. (2019). Employee adaptive performance and its antecedents: review and synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 18(3), 294–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319836315.
Google Scholar
36
-
Rechter, E., & Sverdlik, N. (2016). Adolescents’ and teachers’ outlook on leisure activities: Personal values as a unifying framework. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.095.
Google Scholar
37
-
Reddy, C. (2016). Accepting Change in the workplace: difficulty and benefits. Retrieved on June 29, 2022 from https://content.wisestep.com/ accepting-change-workplace-difficulty-benefits/.
Google Scholar
38
-
Rehman, N., Mahmood, A., Ibtasam, M., Murtaza, S.A., Iqbal, N. & Molnár, E. (2021). The psychology of resistance to change: the antidotal effect of organizational justice, support and leader-member exchange. Frontiers in Psychology, 12-2021. 678952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678952.
Google Scholar
39
-
Soenen, G., & Melkonian, T. (2017). Fairness and commitment to change in M&As: the mediating role of organizational identification. European Management Journal, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.10.005.
Google Scholar
40
-
Solak, N., Tamir, M., Sümer, N., Halperin, E., & Jost, J.T (2021). Expressive suppression as an obstacle to social change: Linking system justification, emotion regulation, and collective action. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09883-5.
Google Scholar
41
-
Sokal, L., Trudel, L. E. and Babb, J. (2020). Canadian teachers’ attitudes toward change, efficacy, and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic, International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100016.
Google Scholar
42
-
Stonehouse, D. (2013). Resistance To Change: The Organisation Dimension. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants, 07, 150-151. 10.12968/bjha.2013.7.3.150.
Google Scholar
43
-
Sutarni, N., Winata, H., Hufad, A., Wulandari, P., & Kusnendi, K. (2022). Resistance and adaptability in change management at vocational high school in West Java, Indonesia. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(2), 202–209. Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/ view/8682.
Google Scholar
44
-
Tayal, R., Upadhyay, R., Yadav, M., Rangnekar, S., & Singh, R. (2018). The impact of transformational leadership on employees acceptance to change: Mediating effects of innovative behaviour and moderating effect of the use of information technology. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48, 00-00. 10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2018-0039.
Google Scholar
45
-
Todd, S. (2022). Importance of workplace adaptability and flexibility. Open-Sourced Workplace. Retrieved from https://opensourced workplace.com/news/importance-of-workplace-adaptability- and-flexibility.
Google Scholar
46
-
Van Dam, K. (2013). Employee adaptability to change at work: A multidimensional, resource-based framework. In S. Oreg, A. Michel, & R. By (Eds.), The Psychology of Organizational Change: Viewing Change from the Employee’s Perspective (pp. 123-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139096690.009.
Google Scholar
47
-
Venus, M., Stam, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Visions of change as visions of continuity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1196.
Google Scholar
48
-
Vveinhardt, J., & Sedziuviene, N. (2022). Acceptance of change by reducing employee resistance and strengthening organizational commitment. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26(1), 356-372.
Google Scholar
49
-
Walk, M., & Handy, F. (2018). Job crafting as reaction to organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886318777227.
Google Scholar
50
-
Zhou, M. and Lin, W. (2016). Adaptability and life satisfaction: the moderating role of social support. Frontiers of Psychology, 7, 1134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01134. PMID: 27516753; PMCID: PMC4963457.
Google Scholar
51