##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

In this paper, we explore the economic, institutional, and political/governmental factors in attracting Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows in the emerging twenty-four Asian economies. To examine the significant determinants of FDI, the study uses panel data for a period of seventeen years (2002-2018). The panel methodology enables us to deal with endogeneity and other issues. Multiple regression models are done for empirical evidence. The study focuses on a holistic approach and considers different variables under three broad areas: economic, institutional, and political aspects. The variables include market size, trade openness, inflation, natural resources, lending rate, capital formation as economic factors, the Business Regulatory Environment and the Business Disclosure Index as institutional factors, and political stability, government effectiveness, and the rule of law as political factors. The empirical findings show most of the economic factors significantly affect FDI inflows, whereas Business Disclosure is the only important institutional variable. Moreover, political stability has a significant positive impact in attracting foreign capital flow, although the impact of government effectiveness is found insignificant. Overall, the economic factors prevail strongly compared to institutional and political factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ahmed, F., & Khan, M. F. H. (2022). Mitigating asymmetric information problem in the local loan markets (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4084168). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4084168.
     Google Scholar
  2. Anjom, W., & Faruq, A. T. M. O. (2023). Financial stability analysis of Islamic Banks in Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(3), 320-326.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bhavan, T., Xu, C., & Zhong, C. (2011). Determinants and growth effect of FDI in South Asian economies: Evidence from a panel data analysis. Electronic Business Journal, 10(1), 2330.
     Google Scholar
  4. Biswas, G. K. (2023). Inflation dynamics of Bangladesh: An empirical analysis. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(3), 288–292.
     Google Scholar
  5. Biswas, G. K., & Islam, K. M. S. (2022). Cointegration analysis and forecasting of the export function of Bangladesh using the error correction model. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 11(3), 680–697.
     Google Scholar
  6. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  7. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (2009). The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1563–1580.
     Google Scholar
  8. Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163–190.
     Google Scholar
  9. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar.
     Google Scholar
  10. Hayat, A. (2018). FDI and economic growth: The role of natural resources? Journal of Economic Studies, 45(2), 283–295.
     Google Scholar
  11. Heckscher, E. F. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 21(1919), pp. 497-512
     Google Scholar
  12. Huiyao, W. (2019, July 5). In 2020, Asian economies will become larger than the rest of the world combined—Here’s how. (n.d.). World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/07/the-dawn-of-the-asian-century/.
     Google Scholar
  13. Krkoska, L. (2001). Foreign direct investment financing of capital formation in Central and Eastern Europe (SSRN Scholarly Paper 314270). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=314270.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kurtishi-Kastrati, S. (2013). Impact of FDI on economic growth: An overview of the main theories of FDI and empirical research. European Scientific Journal, 9(7), 56-77.
     Google Scholar
  15. Mullor-Sebastian, A. (1983). The product life cycle Theory: Empirical evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(3), 95–105.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
     Google Scholar
  17. Saini, N., & Singhania, M. (2018). Determinants of FDI in developed and developing countries: A quantitative analysis using GMM. Journal of Economic Studies, 45(2), 348–382.
     Google Scholar
  18. Thangamani, B., Xu, C., & Zhong, C. (2010). Determinants and growth effect of FDI in South Asian economies: Evidence from a panel data analysis. International Business Research, 4(1), 4350.
     Google Scholar
  19. UNCTAD. (n.d.). Developing countries in Asia receive more than $500 billion in investments. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/news/developing-countries-asia-receive-more-500-billion-investments.
     Google Scholar
  20. Uz Zaman, Q., Donghui, Z., Yasin, G., Zaman, S., & M., Imran. (2018). Trade openness and FDI inflows: A comparative study of Asian countries. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 7(2), 386–396.
     Google Scholar
  21. Valli, M., & Masih, M. (2014, August 24). Is there any causality between inflation and FDI in an ‘inflation targeting’ regime? Evidence from South Africa [MPRA Paper 60246]. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60246/.
     Google Scholar
  22. Vernon, R. (1992). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. In J. M. Letiche (Ed.), International Economic Policies and Their Theoretical Foundations: A sourcebook (2nd ed., pp. 415-435). Academic Press.
     Google Scholar