##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

We analyze the specific determinants of competence on lecturer performance as a moderator of information technology.  The sampling method used is non-probability sampling that is 99 lecturers who work at 11 Seafarers Private Vocational Schools in Indonesia. The analysis used in hypothesis testing is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the help of WarpPLS Software version, 6.0. The results proved that the pedagogical competence (PDC) has a significant influence in improving lecturer performance (LCP), Personality or personal competence (PSC) is proven to increase lecturer performance (LCP). Social competence (SCC) has a significant positive effect on lecturer performance (LCP). Lecturers have the ability to manage learning while in the classroom; this is indicated by the ability of lecturers to master student characteristics so that they can present the material well. Professional competence (PFC) negative and no significant on lecturer performance (LCP). Seafarer technical competence (STC) negative insignificant effect on the lecturer performance (LCP), The Mastery of Information Technology (ITC) roles as a moderator can only be proven in testing the effect of Pedagogical competence (PDC) effect on lecturer performance (LCP), mean while in the other testing is not proven.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Koesmono, HT (2005). The influence of organizational culture on motivation and job satisfaction and employee performance in the medium scale wood processing industry sub-sector in East Java. Journal of management and entrepreneurship, 7 (2), 171-188.
     Google Scholar
  2. Republic of Indonesia. (2005). Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers. State Secretariat. Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  3. Trianto & Tutik, TT (2006). Juridical review Rights and obligations of educators according to the teacher and lecturer law. Surabaya: Literature Achievement.
     Google Scholar
  4. Gibson, JL, Invancevich, JM, & Donnelly, JM (1994). Organization Behavior: Structure and Process. Boston: Homewood, Richard D.
     Google Scholar
  5. Mangkuprawira, S., & Hubeis, AV (2007). Quality management of human resources. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
     Google Scholar
  6. Gloet, M., & Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of manufacturing technology management.
     Google Scholar
  7. Mills, AM, & Smith, TA (2011). Knowledge management and organizational performance: a decomposed view. Journal of knowledge management.
     Google Scholar
  8. Mangkunegara, AP (2006). Planning and Development of Human Resource Management. PT Refika Aditama.
     Google Scholar
  9. Wibowo, SE, & Phil, M. (2007). Work management. Raja Graf Persada, Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  10. Mubarok, Ali. (2010). The Paradox of Professionalism of Lecturers. http://suaramerdeka.com. Accessed 12 October 2018
     Google Scholar
  11. Mahmud. (2002). Lecturers' Performance and Motivation Viewed from the Leadership Style of Private Universities, in NTB Province. Journal of Educational Media Scientific Communication. No. 2.
     Google Scholar
  12. Dekawati, I. (2011). Teacher development management. Journal of Educational Horizons, (2).
     Google Scholar
  13. Semiawan, C. (2008). Education Process Skills, How Students Learn. Jakarta: Gramedia.
     Google Scholar
  14. Adnyana, I.G Rudi & Nur Indriantoro. (2000). The Impact of Knowledge Technology That is Mastered by the Accountant and the Perception of the Benefits of the Information System Related to the Task-Technology Suitability of the Accountant's Performance. KOMPAK Yogyakarta Number 22, 459 – 488
     Google Scholar
  15. Idris, MH, Mappamiring, & Herman Sjahruddin. (2019). Contribute to the value of organizational justice and competence in increasing trust in leaders. FMI 11 Samarinda
     Google Scholar
  16. Sari, RN, & Sjahruddin, H. (2018). Effect of Competence on Employee Professional Moderated Performance.
     Google Scholar
  17. Toban, C., & Sjahruddin, H. (2016). The antecedent and consequence of Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 4 (2), 26-33.
     Google Scholar
  18. Newstrom, JW, & Davis, K. (2002). Organizational behavior (1th ed.). New York: McGrawHill Higher Education.
     Google Scholar
  19. Mangkunegara, A.P (2005). Evaluate the performance of human resources. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
     Google Scholar
  20. Dong, M., Mahfudnurnajamuddin, M., Semmaila, B., & Latief, B. (2019). Contributions Of Human Resources Development, Leadership Style, Organizational Commitment, And Work Motivation On Good Governance And Police Officer Performance (Study Of Police Officer In South Sulawesi Regional Police). European Journal of Business and Management Research, 4 (6).
     Google Scholar
  21. Mitrani, A., Dalziel, M., & Fitt, D. (1992). Competency based human resource management: Value-driven strategies for recruitment, development and reward. Kogan Page.
     Google Scholar
  22. Semmaila, B. (2018). Individual, Socio-Economic, Cultural and Health Characteristics of Employee Work Productivity in Small Industries in Makassar City. EQUITY (Journal of Economics and Finance), 12 (4), 549-567.
     Google Scholar
  23. Ruky, AS (2002). Performance management system. Gramedia Main Library. Jakarta
     Google Scholar
  24. Mangkunegara. AP (2005). Human Resource Management. Company. Bandung: PT Youth Rosdakarya.
     Google Scholar
  25. Thomas, E. (1997). Developing a culture-sensitive pedagogy: Tackling a problem of melding 'global culture' with existing cultural contexts. International Journal of Educational Development, 17 (1), 13-26.
     Google Scholar
  26. Arikunto, S. (1990). Management of teaching humanely. Rineka Cipta.Jakarta
     Google Scholar
  27. Trianto, (2010). Designing Innovative Learning Models - Progressive, Jakarta: Murni Kencana
     Google Scholar
  28. McFadden, AC, Marsh, GE, & Price, BJ (1999). Why do educators embrace high-cost technologies. Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2 (3).
     Google Scholar
  29. McLeod, R., & Schell, GP (2007). Management information systems. USA: Pearson / Prentice Hall.
     Google Scholar
  30. Turban, E., & King, D. (1999). Software (Intelligent) Agents.
     Google Scholar
  31. Baskerville, RL, & Myers, MD (2002). Information systems as a reference discipline. Mis Quarterly, 1-14.
     Google Scholar
  32. Basalamah, HS, Hamzah, HMN, & Zakaria, J. (2019). Effect of Leadership, Work Motivation and Local Culture on Work Discipline and Employee Performance at Wajo District Regency Office. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. Volume 4, Issue 4
     Google Scholar
  33. Radjab, Enny & Idayanti. (2010). Management information System. CV. Light Aulia Pratama, Makassar
     Google Scholar
  34. Kock, N. G. (1969). Intra-abdominal reservoir in patients with permanent ileostomy: preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal continence in five ileostomy patients. Archives of Surgery, 99(2), 223-231.
     Google Scholar
  35. Kock, N. (2011). Using WarpPLS in e-collaboration studies: Descriptive statistics, settings, and key analysis results. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 7(2), 1-18.
     Google Scholar