Auditors’ Opinion: The Paradox of “True and Fair View” of Financial Statements



Abstract Views
1007

Downloads
1613

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Feb 12, 2020
Published Mar 14, 2020
10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.237

Abstract viewed = 1007 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The appropriateness of the age-old accounting phrase “true and fair view” has been questioned in recent times. This stems from the irreconcilable corporate failures of entities whose financial statements had been earlier adjudged, by audit opinion, as being “true and fair”. In the light of the increasing doubts about the truism of financial statements, the objective of this study is to examine how true and fair financial statements are, and propose an alternative concept for use in expressing audit opinion on financial statements. The desk-based approach supplemented with information from some accounting practitioners, is used and the method of analysis is explanatory in nature. The issues highlighted in the discourse on the “true and fair view” concept corroborate the opinion of previous empirical studies that it is virtually and currently unrealistic to describe financial statements as being “true”. It is thus recommended that the phrase should rather be ‘’that the financial statements present fairly the state of the affairs of the organization’’.

Keywords: Audit; Auditor; Auditor’s Opinion; Financial Statements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A. Adeniyi. Auditing and Assurance Service. 2nd ed. Lagos: Value Analysis Consult Publishers,2016.
     Google Scholar
  2. B. N. Okezie. Auditing and Investigation, 2nd ed. Owerri, Nigeria: Bon Publications, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  3. D. Alexander and E. Jermakowicz (2006). A True and Fair view of the Principles/Rules Debate. Abacus, 42 (2). pp. 132 – 164
     Google Scholar
  4. J. E. Mcenroe and S. C. Martens (2004). It’s time for a true and fair view. Accounting Forum. 28. pp. 427 - 430
     Google Scholar
  5. K. K. Maclullich. “Truth and Fairness in Accounting: A case of Polish Transition Economy”, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Edinburg, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  6. K. Ruelzioniene (2010). The true and fair concept in Lithuanian accounting regulation. Social Science /Socialiniai Mokslai, Nr. 1 (67)
     Google Scholar
  7. M. C. Jensen and W. Meckling (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3, pp. 325 – 360.
     Google Scholar
  8. M. Samuelsson and J. Svensson. “True and Fair view: A study of the implications of this concept with ISA and Swedish GAAP”, School of Economics and Commercial law, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  9. M. Tarus, S. Muturi and J. Kwasira (2005). Determinants of accurate financial statement reporting of listed banks in Kenya. Journal of Business and Management. 17(4). pp. 79 – 86.
     Google Scholar
  10. N. Abu Bakar, A. Rahman and A. F. Rashid (2005). Factors influencing Auditor’s independence: Malaysian Loan Officer’s perception. Managerial Auditing Journal. 20. pp. 804 – 822
     Google Scholar
  11. P. M. Collier. Accounting for Managers, Interpreting Accounting Information for Decision-Making. 3rd ed. A John Wiley and Sons Ltd Publications, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  12. R. Anderson, S. Mansi and D. Reeb (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 37. pp. 315-342
     Google Scholar
  13. R. S. Hayes, A. Schilder, R. Dassen and P. Wallage. Principles of Auditing: An International Perspective. London: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  14. S. A. Labaran. Auditing, Investigation and Assurance Services, Jos: Seeye Prints, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  15. W. Boynton, R. Johnson and W. Kell. Assurance and the Integrity of Financial Reporting, 8th ed. New York: John Wiley and Son, Inc., 2005.
     Google Scholar
  16. W. Messier, S. Glover and D. Prawitt. Auditing and Assurance Services, Irwin, United States: Mc Graw – Hill, 2006.
     Google Scholar