Branding Public Universities in Ghana: A Supply Chain Perspective



Abstract Views
499

Downloads
555

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Feb 24, 2020
Published Mar 21, 2020
10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.252

Abstract viewed = 499 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Public universities in Ghana are funded by the state. In spite of this privilege, increased demand for improved facilities and the need for the introduction of innovative and competitive programmes, coupled with intense competition from their private counterparts have increased the pressure on these universities to either innovate or risk being crowded out from the market. The purpose of the paper is to investigate branding strategies adopted by public universities and their effects on meeting stakeholder expectations. The study analysed branding strategies of six public universities in Ghana. The findings revealed that most public universities’ branding strategies focused mainly on improvement of physical infrastructure; the provision of state-of-the-art laboratories; broad band internet services; the introduction of market driven programmes; the mounting of huge signposts and pull-up banners among others. Indeed, the research revealed that the ultimate goal of branding these institutions is to be able to appeal to prospective students and attract well-qualified and competent faculty members. However, further findings point to the fact that little attention is paid to perhaps the most important stakeholders - the students, who according to the extant literature serve as major stakeholders and brand ambassadors for these institutions. This study is significant because it brings to the fore essentials of branding and brand strategies appropriate to academic institutions and also re-orient educational authorities about the importance to rethinking the educational supply chain from the upstream through the midstream or the institutions through the downstream.

Keywords: Branding, Universities, Upstream, Educational Supply Chain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Anholt, S. (2006). Public diplomacy and place branding: Where's the link.
     Google Scholar
  2. Anholt, S. (2006). The Anholt-GMI city brands index: How the world sees the world's cities. Place branding, 2(1), 18-31.
     Google Scholar
  3. Anholt, S. (2006). Why brand? Some practical considerations for nation branding.
     Google Scholar
  4. Berry, L. L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 28(1), 128-137.
     Google Scholar
  5. Botterill, J., & Kline, S. (2007). From McLibel to McLettuce: Childhood, spin and re-branding. Society and Business review, 2(1), 74-97.
     Google Scholar
  6. Constanti, P., & Gibbs, P. (2004). Higher education teachers and emotional labour. International Journal of Educational Management.
     Google Scholar
  7. De Oreck, K., Maon, F., & Lejeune, C. (2013). Taking up the challenge of corporate branding: an integrative framework. European Management Review, 10(3), 137-151.
     Google Scholar
  8. Gilmore, F. (2002). A country—Can it be repositioned? Spain—The success story of country branding. Journal of Brand management, 9(4), 281-293.
     Google Scholar
  9. Hemsley-Brown, J., & Goonawardana, S. (2007). Brand harmonization in the international higher education market. Journal of business Research, 60(9), 942-948.
     Google Scholar
  10. Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching exceptional children, 35(2), 8-17.
     Google Scholar
  11. Kapferer, J. N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. Kogan page publishers.
     Google Scholar
  12. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management (Vol. 14th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall
     Google Scholar
  13. Lee, M. S., Motion, J., & Conroy, D. (2009). Anti-consumption and brand avoidance. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 169-180.
     Google Scholar
  14. McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L., & Yadav, M. S. (2000). An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of service research, 3(2), 121 137.
     Google Scholar
  15. Noaman, A. (2012). Higher education marketing trends for 2012‒2013. Retrieved from: http://aha.elliance.com/2012/08/09/higher-education-marketing-trends-2012-2013/#x2 010;education‐marketing‐trends‐2012‐2013/.
     Google Scholar
  16. Omar, M., Williams, R. L., & Lingelbach, D. (2009). Global brand market‐entry strategy to manage corporate reputation. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
     Google Scholar
  17. Oplatka, I., & Hemsley‐Brown, J. (2007). The incorporation of market orientation in the school culture. International Journal of Educational Management.
     Google Scholar
  18. Roll, M. (2015). Asian brand strategy. In Asian Brand Strategy (Revised and Updated) (pp. 107-140). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
     Google Scholar
  19. Sirkeci, I. (2013). Transnational marketing and transnational consumers (p. 75). New York, Heidelberg, London: Springer.
     Google Scholar
  20. Somma, M. (2014), “Brand Strategy for lasting Value”, http://www.brandingstrategyinsider.com/brand-loyalty, access date, February 18, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  21. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
     Google Scholar
  22. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
     Google Scholar
  23. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
     Google Scholar
  24. Toma, I., Iqbal, K., Tausch, B., Heikkil, J., & Roman, D. (2005). Evaluation of current effort in service and resource matchmaking. ASG Deliverable.
     Google Scholar