The Impact of Organizational Factors Based on Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework on Practical Levels and Characteristics of Audit Analysis and Internal Audit Performance
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of organizational factors based on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework on the applied levels and characteristics of audit analysis and internal audit performance. This study examined the factors that influence the use of audit analytics after applying these analyzes, as well as whether the use of audit analytics improves internal audit performance. This is a descriptive-correlational study. The statistical population of the study consisted of: Certified Public Accountants working in the Audit Organization, Institutions of Public Accountants Society using Cochran formula, 150 individuals were selected as sample. Data gathering tool was a 21-item researcher-made questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by face and structural methods and the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha. Data analysis was performed using Amos 22 software and structural equation modeling method. The findings show that the complexity of information technology (IT), technology competency, managerial support and professional assistance have a positive and significant effect on the application and software level of audit analytics. The size of the organization and auditing standards have a significant and positive effect on the performance of the audited analysts. Functional auditing has a positive and significant effect on the level of (software) auditing analytics, and functional auditing and auditing analysis have a significant positive effect on internal audit performance.
Downloads
References
-
Chen Y. and R. Leith, An Analysis of the Relative Power Characteristics of Analytical Procedures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Fall 1999, pp. 35-69,
Google Scholar
1
-
PWC, 2012. Data Analytics How Data Analytics Can Help Internal Audit Better Understand Risk. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/industry/utilities/ publications/assets/pwc-utility-company-internal-audit-data-analytics.pdf.
Google Scholar
2
-
Tawei Wang, Robert Cuthbertson; Eight Issues on Audit Data Analytics We Would Like Researched. Journal of Information Systems 1 March 2015; 29 (1): 155–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50955
Google Scholar
3
-
Cao, M., Chychyla, R., Stewart, T., 2015. Big data analytics in financial statement audits. Account. Horiz. 29 (2), 423–429.
Google Scholar
4
-
Rahimian, Nizamuddin (2007). Government audit and its types. Journal of Auditing Knowledge. No. 27.
Google Scholar
5
-
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2015. Audit Analytics and Continuous Audit: Looking Toward the Future. Available at: https://www. aicpa.org/interestareas/frc/assuranceadvisoryservices/downloadabledocuments/auditanalytics_lookingtowardfuture.pdf.
Google Scholar
6
-
KPMG, 2012. Leveraging Data Analytics and Continuous Auditing Processes for Improved Audit Planning, Effectiveness and Efficiency. Available at: http://www. kpmg.com/US/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/data-analytics-continuous-auditing.pdf.
Google Scholar
7
-
Araj, F.G., 2015. Responding to Fraud Risk. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (IIARF), Altamonte Springs, FL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1137840.
Google Scholar
8
-
Carcello, J.V., Eulerich, M., Masli, A., Wood, D.A., 2017. Do Internal Audits Reduce Operating, Financial Reporting, and Compliance Risk?.
Google Scholar
9
-
Deloitte, 2016. Internal Audit Analytics: The Journey to 2020, Audit Transformation Through Innovation and Technology. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/ content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/risk/us-risk-internal-audit-analytics-pov.pdf.
Google Scholar
10
-
Thiprungsri, S., Vasarhelyi, M.A., 2011. Cluster analysis for anomaly detection in accounting data: an audit approach. Int. J. Digit. Account. Res. 11.
Google Scholar
11
-
Kim, Y., Vasarhelyi, M.A., 2012. A model to detect potentially fraudulent/abnormal wires of an insurance company: an unsupervised rule-based approach. J. Emerging Technol. Account. 9 (1), 95–110.
Google Scholar
12
-
Jans, M., Alles, M., Vasarhelyi, M., 2014. A field study on the use of process mining of event logs as an analytical procedure in auditing. Account. Rev. 89 (5), 1751–1773.
Google Scholar
13
-
Teammate, 2012. Enhancing Audit Technology Effectiveness-Key Insights From TeamMate's 2014 Global Technology Survey. Available at: https://www. teammatesolutions.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737419044
Google Scholar
14
-
AuditNet, 2012. Survey of More Than 1,500 Auditors Concludes That Audit Professionals Are Not Maximizing Use of Available Audit Technology. Available at: http:// www.auditnet.org/publications/auditnet-news-november-2012/auditnet-2012-state-of-technology-use-by-auditors-survey-of-more-than-1500-auditorsconcludes-that-audit-professionals-are-not-maximizing-use-of-available-audit-technology.
Google Scholar
15
-
Braun, R.L., Davis, H.E., 2003. Computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives. Manag. Audit. J. 18 (9), 725–731.
Google Scholar
16
-
Bierstaker, J., Janvrin, D., Lowe, D.J., 2014. What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques? Adv. Account. 30, 67–74.
Google Scholar
17
-
Mahzan, N., Lymer, A., 2014. Examining the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: cases of generalized audit software use by internal auditors. Manag. Audit. J. 29 (4), 327–349.
Google Scholar
18
-
Lin, C.H., Shih, H.Y., Sher, P.J., 2007. Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: the TRAM model. Psychol. Mark. 24, 641–657.
Google Scholar
19
-
Cohen, A., Sayag, G., 2010. The effectiveness of internal auditing: an empirical examination of its determinants in Israeli organisations. Aust. Account. Rev. 20 (3), 296–307.
Google Scholar
20
-
IIA,2017. International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards). The Institute of Internl Auditors (1220.A2).
Google Scholar
21
-
Sun, H., 2012. Understanding user revisions when using information system features: adaptive system use and triggers. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 36 (2), 453–478.
Google Scholar
22
-
Jasperson, J.S., Carter, P.E., Zmud, R.W., 2005. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Q. 29 (3), 525–557.
Google Scholar
23
-
Hiltz, S.R., Turoff, M., 1981. The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system. Commun. ACM 24 (11), 739–751.
Google Scholar
24
-
Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., 1995. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inf. Syst. Res. 6 (2), 118–143.
Google Scholar
25
-
Ndubisi, N.O., Gupta, O.K., Massoud, S., 2003. Organizational learning and vendor support quality by the usage of application software packages: a study of Asian entrepreneurs. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 12 (3), 314–331.
Google Scholar
26
-
Sarens G. & I. Beelde, De 2006. "Interaction between internal auditors and the audit committee: An analysis of expectations and perceptions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/357, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Google Scholar
27
-
Moghaddam maenavi, Amir Hadi (2016). The future of auditing is the use of advanced analysis tools. Auditor's Journal.
Google Scholar
28
-
Ahmad Khodami, P., & Muslim Saeedi, G. (2011). Investigating the effect of analytical methods results on auditors' efforts in auditing accounting estimates. Accounting and Auditing Research, 2011 (10). Retrieved from http://ensani.ir/en/article/227133
Google Scholar
29
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Mehdi Moradi,
Ehsan Rahmani Nia,
The Impact of Organizational Factors Based on Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework on Practical Levels and Characteristics of Audit Analysis and Internal Audit Performance , European Journal of Business and Management Research: Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020)