Research Article

Current State of Sustainability Reporting: A Case of Public Universities in Western Kenya

Patrick Ojera
Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.
Collins Otieno Odoyo
Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.295

Read Counter
548

Downloads
510

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2020-04-07
Published 2020-04-13

Read counter = 548 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Corporate sustainability reporting, also known as Triple-bottom-line reporting, involves reporting nonfinancial and financial information to a broader set of stakeholders than just shareholders and seek to fortify an organization’s ability to manage key risks. The current case is that, the quality, rigor, and utility of sustainability reporting remains contentious with concerns about the suitability of the criteria or standards used to prepare the reports. Despite the rapid increase in the number of companies around the world adopting Global Reporting Initiative standards, little is known about the extent of practice of corporate sustainability reporting in public universities in Kenya. The study selected five universities that had their 2017-18 audited financial reports available online for the readers, which served as the main source of secondary data. The guidelines on corporate sustainability reporting was derived from literature review, which provided key indicators upon which the data from each university was evaluated. It was observed that almost all the institutions recognize the critical role of both internal and external independent audit of financial statements. In conclusion, financial reporting sustainability is guided by strict compliance to the factors of sustainability.

Keywords: Corporate sustainability reporting, Environmental accounting and reporting, Public universities, Sustainability reporting, CSR

References

  1. Durden, C., (2008), “Towards a socially responsible management control system”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 Iss 5 pp. 671 – 694. Accessed on 11th July, 209 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227428871_Towards_a_Socially_Responsible_Management_Control_System
     Google Scholar
  2. Global Reporting Initiative, (2013), 2013 Global Conference on Sustainability and Reporting. Accessed on 11july, 2019 from: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/2013-GRI-Global-Conference-in-Review.pdf
     Google Scholar
  3. KPMG, (2002), KPMG International Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2002. Accessed on 11th July, 2019 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254746739_KPMG_International_Survey_of_Corporate_Sustainability_Reporting_2002
     Google Scholar
  4. Vann, J. W., & White, G. B., (2014), journal of Business & Economics Research – December 2004 Volume 2, Number 12, 17-30
     Google Scholar
  5. Tilt, C. A., (2009) Corporate Responsibility, Accounting and Accountants Chapter Corporate Responsibility, Accounting and Accountants Carol A. Tilt, S.O. Idowu, W.L. Filho (eds.), Professionals’ Perspectives of Corporate Social 11 Responsibility, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02630-0_2, C
     Google Scholar
  6. Eccles, R. G., Herz, R. H., Keegan, E. M., and David M.H. Phillips, D. M. H., (2001). The Value Reporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game:, Wiley, New York, 2001, xvii +349 pp., February 2002, The International Journal of Accounting 37(1):145-148. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7063(02)00130-9
     Google Scholar
  7. Satinder Singh and Ashwarya Sharma (2015) “Corporate Social Responsibility practices in India: Analysis of public companies” International journal of business quantitative economics and applied management research, Volume 1, issue 11, April 2015 Pg.no 33-44.
     Google Scholar
  8. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, (2000), Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, http://bit.ly/2JJbvuN
     Google Scholar
  9. Gray, R., Javad, David, M., Power, M., and Donald, C., (1996). Sinclair Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note and Extension.
     Google Scholar
  10. Deegan, C., 2000, Financial Accounting Theory, McGraw Hill Book Company, Sydney.
     Google Scholar
  11. Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975) Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
     Google Scholar
  12. Adams, CA & Whelan, G 2009, ‘Conceptualising future change in corporate sustainability reporting’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 118 – 143.
     Google Scholar
  13. Radin, A. J., (2016)., “What Is Sustainability Reporting?” http://bit.ly/1pBsVLq
     Google Scholar
  14. Pandit, G. M., (2016), The Current State of Sustainability Reporting by Smaller S&P 500 Companies What Do Businesses Choose to Disclose? CMA June 2016 Issue.
     Google Scholar
  15. Van Der Ploeg, L., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Credible Claim or Corporate Spin? A Checklist to Evaluate Corporate Sustainability Reports. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 15(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333213500129
     Google Scholar