Linking Innovation to Firm Performance in Developing Countries: the Role of Trade Liberalization
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This study set out to analyze the effect of innovation on firm performance in developing economies in the era of trade liberalization. The study uses data from the enterprise survey of the World Bank covering 19 Sub Saharan African countries surveyed between 2014 and 2016, with a total of 8,551 firms included. In order to effectively analyze the effect of innovation on firm performance, the CDM model is adopted to analyze R&D intensity, the effect of domestic R&D on innovation output, and the contribution of innovation to firm performance in the sub region. The study further tests for the effect of foreign technology and the import of products and services on the innovation process. Analysis is done using ordinary least squares. Findings suggest a positive and significant effect of foreign technology on domestic R&D, while imports have a negative effect on domestic R&D. Domestic R&D has positive effect on both product and process innovations among firms in the sub region. Moreover, both product and process innovations have a positive and significant effect on firm performance in the sub region. Meanwhile, the export of innovations is not found to be significant in this study. We therefore recommend that governments in the region should give tax incentives to organizations that import products that are meant specifically for the production of new products and processes. Firms in the sub region should also focus on narrow market segments where they have specialist expertise in, so as to be competitive in the global market.
Downloads
References
-
S. M. Lee and S. Trimi, “Innovation for creating a smart future,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2018.
Google Scholar
1
-
S. M. Lee, D. L. Olson, and S. Trimi, “Innovative collaboration for value creation,” Organ. Dyn., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2012.
Google Scholar
2
-
J. Fagerberg, M. Srholec, and B. Verspagen, Innovation and economic development, 1st ed., vol. 2, no. 1. Elsevier B.V., 2010.
Google Scholar
3
-
J. Gwartney and R. Lawson, “Economic Freedom ofthe World: 2004 Annual Report.” The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, 2004.
Google Scholar
4
-
Z. Xie and J. Li, “Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: The moderating role of institutional development,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 222–245, 2018.
Google Scholar
5
-
K. Seenaiah and B. N. Rath, “Determinants of innovation in selected manufacturing firms in India: Role of R&D and exports,” Sci. Technol. Soc., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 65–84, 2018.
Google Scholar
6
-
P. Shu and C. Steinwender, “The impact of trade liberalization on firm productivity and innovation,” Innov. Policy Econ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 39–68, 2019.
Google Scholar
7
-
M. Bas and I. Ledezma, “Trade integration and within-plant productivity evolution in Chile,” Rev. World Econ., vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 113–146, 2010.
Google Scholar
8
-
L. Iacovone, “The better you are the stronger it makes you : Evidence on the asymmetric impact of liberalization ☆,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 474–485, 2012.
Google Scholar
9
-
A. M. Fernandes and C. Paunov, “Does trade stimulate product quality upgrading?,” Can. J. Econ. Can. d’économique, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1232–1264, 2013.
Google Scholar
10
-
P. Medina, “Import Competition, Quality Upgrading and Exporting: Evidence from the Peruvian Apparel Industry,” Univ. Toronto Mimeo, pp. 1–79, 2017.
Google Scholar
11
-
N. Bloom, M. Draca, and J. Van Reenen, “Trade induced technical change? The impact of chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity,” Rev. Econ. Stud., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 87–117, 2016.
Google Scholar
12
-
F. Crowley and P. McCann, “Firm innovation and productivity in Europe: evidence from innovation-driven and transition-driven economies,” Appl. Econ., vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1203–1221, 2018.
Google Scholar
13
-
A. Exposito and J. A. Sanchis-Llopis, “Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: New evidence from a multi-dimensional approach,” Int. Small Bus. J., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 911–931, 2018.
Google Scholar
14
-
K. Fartash et al., “The Impact of Technology Acquisition & Exploitation on Organizational Innovation and Organizational Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1497–1507, 2018.
Google Scholar
15
-
G. Berulava and T. Gogokhia, “Complementarities of Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Transition Economies,” in Eurasian Economic Perspectives, Springer, 2018, pp. 169–192.
Google Scholar
16
-
V. Ramadani, R. D. Hisrich, H. Abazi-Alili, L.-P. Dana, L. Panthi, and L. Abazi-Bexheti, “Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 140, pp. 271–280, 2019.
Google Scholar
17
-
A. T. Karabulut, “Effects of innovation types on performance of manufacturing firms in Turkey,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 195, pp. 1355–1364, 2015.
Google Scholar
18
-
D. Isogawa, K. Nishikawa, and H. Ohashi, “New-to-Market Product Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from a firm-level innovation survey in Japan,” Citeseer, 2012.
Google Scholar
19
-
M. Goedhuys, “Learning, product innovation, and firm heterogeneity in developing countries; Evidence from Tanzania,” Ind. Corp. Chang., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 269–292, 2007.
Google Scholar
20
-
J. Masso and P. Vahter, “The role of product-level dynamics in export growth and productivity: evidence from Estonia,” Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 42–60, 2014.
Google Scholar
21
-
L. Barasa, J. Knoben, P. Vermeulen, P. Kimuyu, and B. Kinyanjui, “Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach,” Res. Policy, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 280–291, 2017.
Google Scholar
22
-
P. Mendi and R. Mudida, “The effect on innovation of beginning informal: Empirical evidence from Kenya,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 131, no. June, pp. 326–335, 2018.
Google Scholar
23
-
S. Mlozi, O. Pesämaa, and S. Jack, “Role of reciprocity and innovativeness on performance in a developing context: Empirical evidence from Africa,” African J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–84, 2018.
Google Scholar
24
-
P. J. A. Robson, H. M. Haugh, and B. A. Obeng, “Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: Enterprising Africa,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 331–350, 2009.
Google Scholar
25
-
M. Abdu and A. Jibir, “Determinants of firms innovation in Nigeria,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 448–456, 2018.
Google Scholar
26
-
E. Ndemezo and C. Kayitana, “Innovation and Firms ’ Performance in the Rwandese Manufacturing Industry . A firm Level Empirical Analysis,” no. January, pp. 1–19, 2017.
Google Scholar
27
-
K. Anderson, W. Martin, and D. Van der Mensbrugghe, “Global impacts of the Doha Scenarios on poverty,” WTO, p. 497, 2005.
Google Scholar
28
-
S. Athreye and J. Cantwell, “Creating competition?: Globalisation and the emergence of new technology producers,” Res. Policy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 209–226, 2007.
Google Scholar
29
-
P. J. Buckley and N. Hashai, “The role of technological catch up and domestic market growth in the genesis of emerging country based multinationals,” Res. Policy, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 423–437, 2014.
Google Scholar
30
-
K. You and N. Sarantis, “Structural breaks, rural transformation and total factor productivity growth in China,” J. Product. Anal., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 231–242, 2013.
Google Scholar
31
-
W. Keller, “International technology diffusion,” J. Econ. Lit., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 752–782, 2004.
Google Scholar
32
-
X. Fu and Y. Gong, “Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: evidence from China,” World Dev., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1213–1225, 2011.
Google Scholar
33
-
A. Thutupalli and M. Iizuka, “Catching-up in agricultural innovation : the case of Bacillus thuringiensis cotton in India,” pp. 1–18, 2016.
Google Scholar
34
-
Y. W. Cheung, J. De Haan, X. Qian, and S. Yu, “China’s Outward Direct Investment in Africa,” Rev. Int. Econ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 201–220, 2012.
Google Scholar
35
-
C. Ackah and O. Morrissey, “Trade Policy and Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa since the 1980s,” African Dev. Bank Econ. Res. Work. Pap., vol. 78, no. 05, 2005.
Google Scholar
36
-
D. Greenaway and O. Morrissey, “Multilateral institutions and unilateral trade liberalisation in developing countries,” in Trade and Development, Springer, 1996, pp. 135–160.
Google Scholar
37
-
A. Musolesi and J.-P. Huiban, “Innovation and productivity in knowledge intensive business services,” J. Product. Anal., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 63–81, 2010.
Google Scholar
38
-
B. H. Hall, “Innovation and productivity in firms,” no. March, pp. 1–11, 2011.
Google Scholar
39
-
G. Teplykh, “Analysis of the Innovation Activities of Firms Using the CDM Approach,” Probl. Econ. Transit., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 443–462, 2016.
Google Scholar
40
-
A. M. Fernandes and W. Bank, “Does trade stimulate product quality upgrading ?,” vol. 46, no. 4, 2013.
Google Scholar
41
-
R. J. Barro and X. Sala-I-Martin, “Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth,” J. Econ. Growth, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1997.
Google Scholar
42
-
L. Potters, “Innovation input and innovation output: differences among sectors,” IPTS Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation, 2009.
Google Scholar
43
-
H. Snyder, L. Witell, A. Gustafsson, P. Fombelle, and P. Kristensson, “Identifying categories of service innovation : A review and synthesis of the literature,” vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 2401–2408, 2016.
Google Scholar
44
-
G. Gopinath and B. Neiman, “Trade adjustment and productivity in large crises,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 793–831, 2014.
Google Scholar
45
-
N. Foster-McGregor, A. Isaksson, and F. Kaulich, “Importing, exporting and performance in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms,” Rev. World Econ., vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 309–336, 2014.
Google Scholar
46
-
M. Bas and V. Strauss-Kahn, “Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France,” Rev. World Econ., vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 241–275, 2014.
Google Scholar
47
-
M. Bas, “Input-trade liberalization and fi rm export decisions : Evidence from Argentina,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 481–493, 2012.
Google Scholar
48
-
L. Halpern, M. Koren, and A. Szeidl, “Imported Inputs and Productivity †,” vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 3660–3703, 2015.
Google Scholar
49
-
A. C. Fieler, M. Eslava, and D. Y. Xu, “Trade, quality upgrading, and input linkages: Theory and evidence from Colombia,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 109–146, 2018.
Google Scholar
50
-
K. Gonchar and B. Kuznetsov, “How import integration changes firms’ decisions to innovate,” Ann. Reg. Sci., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 501–528, 2018.
Google Scholar
51
-
L. Yu, H. Li, Z. Wang, and Y. Duan, “Technology imports and self-innovation in the context of innovation quality,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 214, pp. 44–52, 2019.
Google Scholar
52
-
M. Bombardini, G. Orefice, and M. D. Tito, “Does exporting improve matching? Evidence from French employer-employee data,” J. Int. Econ., vol. 117, pp. 229–241, 2019.
Google Scholar
53
-
L. Brandt, J. Van Biesebroeck, L. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 2784–2820, 2017.
Google Scholar
54
-
P. Bustos, “Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 304–340, 2011.
Google Scholar
55
-
P. Aghion, A. Bergeaud, M. Lequien, and M. J. Melitz, “The impact of exports on innovation: Theory and evidence,” 2018.
Google Scholar
56
-
E. A. Bøler, A. Moxnes, and K. H. Ulltveit-Moe, “R&D, international sourcing, and the joint impact on firm performance,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 3704–3739, 2015.
Google Scholar
57
-
K. Wang and W. Tao, “Exploring the complementarity between product exports and foreign technology imports for innovation in emerging economic firms,” Eur. J. Mark., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 224–256, 2019.
Google Scholar
58
-
F. Pieri, M. Vecchi, and F. Venturini, “Modelling the joint impact of R&D and ICT on productivity: A frontier analysis approach,” Res. Policy, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1842–1852, 2018.
Google Scholar
59
-
J. Jeon, S. Kim, and J. Koh, “Historical review on the patterns of open innovation at the national level : the case of the roman period,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., pp. 1–17, 2015.
Google Scholar
60
-
Y. Kim, D. A. Briley, and M. G. Ocepek, “Computers in Human Behavior Differential innovation of smartphone and application use by sociodemographics and personality,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 44, pp. 141–147, 2015.
Google Scholar
61
-
F. Venturini, “The modern drivers of productivity,” Res. Policy, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 357–369, 2015.
Google Scholar
62
-
C. Corrado, J. Haskel, and C. Jona‐Lasinio, “Knowledge spillovers, ICT and productivity growth,” Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat., vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 592–618, 2017.
Google Scholar
63
-
X. Fu, P. Mohnen, and G. Zanello, “Innovation and productivity in formal and informal firms in Ghana,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 131, 2018.
Google Scholar
64
-
A. C. Fieler, M. Eslava, and D. Y. Xu, “Trade, quality upgrading, and input linkages: Theory and evidence from colombia,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 109–146, 2018.
Google Scholar
65
-
L. Edwards, M. Sanfilippo, and A. Sundaram, “Importing and firm performance: new evidence from South Africa,” WIDER Working Paper, 2016.
Google Scholar
66
-
L. E. Okafor, M. Bhattacharya, and H. Bloch, “Imported intermediates, absorptive capacity and productivity: evidence from Ghanaian manufacturing firms,” World Econ., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 369–392, 2017.
Google Scholar
67
-
N. Foster-mcgregor and R. Stehrer, “Value added content of trade : A comprehensive approach,” Econ. Lett., vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 354–357, 2013.
Google Scholar
68
-
B. Crépon, E. Duguet, and J. Mairessec, “Research, Innovation And Productivi [Ty: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level,” Econ. Innov. new Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 115–158, 1998.
Google Scholar
69
-
H. Lööf, J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen, “CDM 20 years after.” Taylor & Francis, 2017.
Google Scholar
70
-
J. Guan and R. C. M. Yam, “Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s,” Res. Policy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 273–282, 2015.
Google Scholar
71
-
Y. Zhang, U. Khan, S. Lee, and M. Salik, “The Influence of Management Innovation and Technological Innovation on Organization Performance. A Mediating Role of Sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 495, 2019.
Google Scholar
72
-
G. Teplykh, “Analysis of the Innovation Activities of Firms Using the CDM Approach,” Probl. Econ. Transit., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 443–462, 2016.
Google Scholar
73
-
D. M. Reid, “Absorptive capacity and innovation in China,” Int. J. Emerg. Mark., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 134–154, 2019.
Google Scholar
74
-
J. Masso and P. Vahter, “Innovation and Firm Performance in a Catching-up Economy,” Proc. from Conf. Micro Evid. Innov. Dev., no. 6853, pp. 1–23, 2007.
Google Scholar
75
-
B. Yuan and Q. Xiang, “Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: Based on an extended CDM model,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 176, pp. 895–908, 2018.
Google Scholar
76
-
C. Curran and J. Leker, “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Patent indicators for monitoring convergence – examples from NFF and ICT,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 256–273, 2011.
Google Scholar
77
-
L. Barasa, P. Vermeulen, J. Knoben, B. Kinyanjui, and P. Kimuyu, “Innovation inputs and efficiency: manufacturing firms in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 59–83, 2019.
Google Scholar
78
-
X. Fu, C. Pietrobelli, and L. Soete, “The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: technological change and catching-up,” World Dev., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1204–1212, 2011.
Google Scholar
79
-
S. Biggs, “Participatory technology development: a critique of the new orthodoxy,” AVOCADO Ser., vol. 6, no. 95, pp. 1–10, 1995.
Google Scholar
80
-
M. Ghosh and R. P. Roy, “FDI, Technology Imports and R&D in Indian Manufacturing: Revisited,” in Globalisation of Technology, Springer, 2018, pp. 127–149.
Google Scholar
81
-
M. Kim, “Does Import Competition Reduce Domestic Innovation? Evidence from the’China Stock’and Firm-Level Data on Canadian Manufacturing,” Centre for the Study of Living Standards, 2019.
Google Scholar
82
-
Q. Liu and L. D. Qiu, “Intermediate input imports and innovations: Evidence from Chinese firms’ patent filings,” J. Int. Econ., vol. 103, pp. 166–183, 2016.
Google Scholar
83
-
B. Shepherd, “Openness and Innovation: Firm-level Evidence from India,” South Asia Econ. J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 64–75, 2017.
Google Scholar
84
-
Y. A. Abubakar, C. Hand, D. Smallbone, and G. Saridakis, “What specific modes of internationalization influence SME innovation in Sub-Saharan least developed countries (LDCs)?,” Technovation, vol. 79, no. May 2016, pp. 56–70, 2019.
Google Scholar
85
-
K. Lee and F. Malerba, “Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems,” Res. Policy, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 338–351, 2017.
Google Scholar
86
-
T. Farole and D. Winkler, “Firm location and the determinants of exporting in low-and middle-income countries,” J. Econ. Geogr., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 395–420, 2014.
Google Scholar
87
-
H. Evanschitzky, M. Eisend, R. J. Calantone, and Y. Jiang, “Success factors of product innovation: An updated meta‐analysis,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 29, pp. 21–37, 2012.
Google Scholar
88
-
C. Altomonte, T. Aquilante, G. Békés, and G. I. P. Ottaviano, “Internationalization and innovation of firms: evidence and policy,” Econ. policy, vol. 28, no. 76, pp. 663–700, 2013.
Google Scholar
89
-
P. Almodóvar, J. Saiz-Briones, and B. S. Silverman, “Learning through foreign market participation: the relative benefits of exporting, importing, and foreign direct investment,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 915–944, 2014.
Google Scholar
90