What We Know and What We Do Not Know about Trust in Work Teams: A Systematic Literature Review



Abstract Views
2301

Downloads
1645

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Apr 22, 2020
Published Jun 5, 2020
10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.3.303

Abstract viewed = 2301 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Trust in work teams is a growing field of research. Numerous studies research trust in work teams in connection to team effectiveness and team performance. But this substantial amount of work lacks continuity and systematization in terms of conceptualization and operationalization. With this research project we take stock of the knowledge from previous studies and carry out a systematic review of the literature on trust in work teams. We analyze a total of 64 papers addressing trust in work teams, published between 1999 and 2019 (inclusive). In our review we focus on how trust in teams has been conceptualized and operationalized, how trust develops and is maintained in work teams, and on the tangled relationships between trust, distrust, and control. With this paper we contribute to the field of management and organizational studies by offering a theoretical framework of the antecedents of trust in work teams and by identifying current research gaps and future research directions. 

Keywords: organisational trust teams systematic review

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A.C. Costa, C. A. Fulmer, and N. R. Anderson, “Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1–16, February 2018.
     Google Scholar
  2. C. Breuer, J. Hueffmeier, and G. Hertel, “Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 1151–1177, August 2016.
     Google Scholar
  3. B. A. De Jong, K. T. Dirks, and N. Gillespie, “Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators and covariates” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 1134–1150, August 2016.
     Google Scholar
  4. C. D. Dumitru and M. A. Schoop, M. A. “How does trust in teams, team identification, and organisational identification impact trust in organisations?,” International Journal of Management and Applied Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87-97, March 2016.
     Google Scholar
  5. A. M. Nienaber, M. Holtgrave, and P. D. Romeike, “Trust in teams: A review across levels,” in The Routledge Companion to Trust, R. H. Searle, A.-M. I. Nienaber, and S. B. Sitkin, Eds. Abingdon, OX: Routledge, 2018, pp. 89–107.
     Google Scholar
  6. R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman, “An integrative model of organizational trust,” The Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709–734, July 1995.
     Google Scholar
  7. D. Meyerson, K. E. Weick, and R. M. Kramer, “Swift trust and temporary groups,” in Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 1st ed., R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, Eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 166–195.
     Google Scholar
  8. R. J. Lewicki, E. C. Tomlinson, and N. Gillespie, “Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions,” Journal of Management, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 991–1022, December 2006.
     Google Scholar
  9. C. A. Fulmer and M. J. Gelfand, “At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels,” Journal of Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1167–1230, May 2012.
     Google Scholar
  10. D. M. Rousseau, S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer, “Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust," Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 393-404 1998.
     Google Scholar
  11. G. Möllering,Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity, 1st ed London, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  12. N. A. Gillespie and L. Mann, “Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 588–607, September 2004.
     Google Scholar
  13. F. D. Schoorman, R. C. Mayer, and J. H. Davis, “An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 344–354, April 2007.
     Google Scholar
  14. R. C. Ford, R. F. Piccolo, and L. R. Ford, “Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is key,” Business Horizons, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  15. B. C. Crisp and S. L. Jarvenpaa, “Swift trust in global virtual teams: Trusting beliefs and normative actions,” Journal of Personnel Psychology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–56, February 2013.
     Google Scholar
  16. R. M. Kramer, “Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 50, pp. 569–598, February 1999.
     Google Scholar
  17. H. Tajfel and J. Turner, “The social identity theory of intergroup behavior,” in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, S. Worchel & W. G. Austin, Eds. Chicago: Nelson Hall, pp. 7–24, 1986.
     Google Scholar
  18. B. D. Adams, D. J. Bryant, and R. D. G. Webb, “Trust in teams: A review of the literature,” Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Research Report, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  19. M. B. Brewer, “Managing diversity: The role of social identities,” in Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace, S. Jackson and M. Ruderman, Eds. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995, pp. 47–68.
     Google Scholar
  20. A. Edmondson, Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  21. J. L. Wildman, M. L. Shuffler, E. H. Lazzara, S. M. Fiore, C. S. Burke, E. Salas, and S. Garven, “Trust development in swift starting action teams: A multilevel framework,” Group & Organization Management, vol. 37, pp. 137–170, April 2012.
     Google Scholar
  22. S. L. Jarvenpaa and D. E. Leidner, “Communication and trust in global virtual teams,” Organization Science, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 791–815, December 1999.
     Google Scholar
  23. D. H. Mcknight and N. L. Chervany, “Reflections on an initial trust-building model,” in Handbook of Trust Research, 1st ed., R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer Eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006, pp. 29–51.
     Google Scholar
  24. D. H. McKnight, L. L. Cummings, and N. L. Chervany, “Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 473–490, July 1998.
     Google Scholar
  25. R. J. Lewicki and B. B. Bunker, “Trust in relationships," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 583-601, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  26. L. van der Werff and F. Buckley, “Getting to know you: A longitudinal examination of trust cues and trust development during socialization. Journal of Management, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 742–770, March 2017.
     Google Scholar
  27. R. W. Boss, “Trust and managerial problem solving revisited,” Group & Organization Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 331–342, September 1978.
     Google Scholar
  28. D. E. Zand, “Trust and managerial problem solving,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 229–239, June 1972.
     Google Scholar
  29. A. Booth, D. Papaioannou, and A. Sutton, Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, 1st ed. London, UK: Sage Publications, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  30. M. Petticrew and H. Roberts, Systematic reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide, 1st ed., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  31. C. Pickering and J. Byrne, “The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers.” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 534-548, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  32. D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, “Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review,” British Journal of Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 207–222, September 2003.
     Google Scholar
  33. D. Denyer and D. Tranfield, “Producing a systematic review,” in The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, D. Buchanan and A. Bryman, Eds. London, UK: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 671–689.
     Google Scholar
  34. R. B. Briner, D. Denyer, and D. M. Rousseau, “Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time?” Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 19–32, November 2009.
     Google Scholar
  35. F. Friedlander, “The primacy of trust as a facilitator of further group accomplishment,” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 387–400, December 1970.
     Google Scholar
  36. B. G. Piccoli and B. Ives, “Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 365–396, September 2003.
     Google Scholar
  37. N. Gaan, “Collaborative tools and virtual team effectiveness: An inductively derived approach in India’s software sector,” Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 5-27, April 2012.
     Google Scholar
  38. M. C. Lander, R. L. Purvis, G. E. McCary, and W. Leigh, “Trust-building mechanisms utilized in outsourced IS development projects: A case study,” Information and Management, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 509–528, March 2004.
     Google Scholar
  39. A. C. Costa and N. Anderson, “Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol 20, no. 1, pp. 119–154, February 2011.
     Google Scholar
  40. D. Chan, “Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 234–246, April 1998.
     Google Scholar
  41. B. A. De Jong and K. T. Dirks, “Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: implications of asymmetry and dissensus,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 391–406, May 2012.
     Google Scholar
  42. R. M. Kramer, “Collective trust within organizations: Conceptual foundations and empirical insights,” Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 82–97, July 2010.
     Google Scholar
  43. B. McEvily, R. A. Weber, C. Bicchieri, and Y. T. Ho, “Can groups be trusted? An experimental study of trust in collective entities,” in Handbook of Trust Research, 1st ed., R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer Eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006, pp. 52– 67.
     Google Scholar
  44. S. A. Kiffin-Petersen and J. L. Cordery, “Trust, individualism and job characteristics as predictors of employee preference for teamwork,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 93–116, February 2003.
     Google Scholar
  45. G. Dietz, “Going back to the source: Why do people trust each other?”, Journal of Trust Research, vol 1, no. 2, pp. 215-222, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  46. D. M. Rousseau, “Now let’s make multi-level research on trust doable,” Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes, no. 3, pp.159-166, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  47. D. L. Ferrin, M. C. Bligh, and L. C. Kohles, “Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships,” Group & Organization Management, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 465-499, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  48. D. J. McAllister, “Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 24–59, February 1995.
     Google Scholar
  49. G. Barczak, F. Lassk, and J. Mulki, “Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture,” Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 332–345, November 2010.
     Google Scholar
  50. M. Williams, “In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 377–396, July 2001.
     Google Scholar
  51. M. A. Marks, J. E. Mathieu, and S. J. Zaccaro, “A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 356–376, July 2001.
     Google Scholar
  52. S. W. Kozlowski and K. J. Klein (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes,” in Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, 1st ed., K. J. Klein and S. W. J. Kozlowski, Eds. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000, pp. 3–90.
     Google Scholar
  53. C. A. Fulmer and C. Ostroff, “Convergence and emergence in organizations: An integrative framework and review,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 37, no. 51, pp. 122-145, February 2016.
     Google Scholar
  54. C. E. Naquin and T. R. Kurtzberg, “Team negotiation and perceptions of trustworthiness: The whole versus the sum of the parts,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 133–150, June 2009.
     Google Scholar
  55. A. Edmondson, “Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 350-383. June 1999.
     Google Scholar
  56. R. Zolin, P. J. Hinds, R. Fruchter, and R. E. Levitt, “Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study,” Information and Organization, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–26, January 2004.
     Google Scholar
  57. A. Cheshin, A. Rafaeli, and N. Bos, “Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others’ affect in the absence of non-verbal cues,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 2–16, September 2011.
     Google Scholar
  58. S. G. Barsade, “The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 644-675, December 2002.
     Google Scholar
  59. Oda, T. Naganawa, S. Yamauchi, N. Yamagata, and A. Matsumoto-Oda, Altruists are trusted based on non-verbal cues. Biology Letters, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 752-754, July 2009.
     Google Scholar
  60. S. Centorrino, E. Djemai, A. Hopfensitz, M. Milinski, and P. Seabright, “Honest signaling in trust interactions: Smiles rated as genuine induce trust and signal higher learning opportunities,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 8–16, January 2015.
     Google Scholar
  61. S. L. Jarvenpaa, K. Knoll, and D. E. Leidner, “Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 29–64, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  62. S. L. Jarvenpaa, T. R. Shaw, and D. S. Staples, “Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams,” Information Systems Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 250–267, September 2004.
     Google Scholar
  63. B. A. Aubert and B. L. Kelsey, “Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams,” Small Group Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 575–618, October 2003.
     Google Scholar
  64. Zornoza, V. Orengo, and V. Peñarroja, “Relational capital in virtual teams: The role played by trust. Social Science Information, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 257–281, June 2009.
     Google Scholar
  65. B. A. De Jong and T. Elfring, “Mediated and differential effects of trust on team performance: A study of ongoing work teams,” Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, January 2007.
     Google Scholar
  66. M. D. Baer, L. van der Werff, J. A. Colquitt, J. B. Rodell, K. P. Zipay, and F. Buckley, “Trusting the ‘Look and Feel’: Situational normality, situational aesthetics, and the perceived trustworthiness of organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1718–1740, October 2018.
     Google Scholar
  67. J. M. Wilson, S. G. Straus, and B. McEvily, “All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 16–33, January 2006.
     Google Scholar
  68. P. B. Lowry, R. M. Schuetzler, J. S. Giboney, and T. A. Gregory, “Is trust always better than distrust? The potential value of distrust in newer virtual teams engaged in short-term decision-making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 723–752, July 2015.
     Google Scholar
  69. J. Tanghe, B. Wisse, and H. van der Flier, “The role of group members affects the relationship between trust and cooperation,” British Journal of Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 359–374, June 2010.
     Google Scholar
  70. G. R. Jones and J. M. George, “The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork,” The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 531–546, July 1998.
     Google Scholar
  71. R. J. Lewicki, D. J. McAllister, and R. J. Bies, “Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 438-458, July 1998.
     Google Scholar
  72. C. W. Langfred, “Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 385–399, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  73. F. Lyon, G. Möllering, and M. N. Saunders, “Introduction. Researching trust: the ongoing challenge of matching objectives and methods,” in the Handbook of Research Methods on Trust. London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  74. S. S. Webber, “Leadership and trust facilitating cross-functional team success,” Journal of Management Development, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 201–214, April 2002.
     Google Scholar
  75. C. D. Dumitru, “Predictors of organizational trust: The relationship between organizational trust and organizational identification,” International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 161–167, July 2015.
     Google Scholar
  76. D. Hamburger, “Project kick-off: getting the project off on the right foot,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115-122, May 1992.
     Google Scholar
  77. A. Jones and D. Jones, “Improving teamwork, trust and safety: An ethnographic study of an interprofessional initiative,” Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 175–181, May 2011.
     Google Scholar
  78. C. D. Dumitru,” Practices of building and maintaining trust in cross-functional teams,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Business Administration, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany, 2019.
     Google Scholar