##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study investigated management competency influence on performance of family planning program in Kuresoi North Sub-County, Nakuru County, Kenya. The study was founded on the theory of constraint and adopted a pragmatism paradigm. It applied descriptive research method using mixed method approach to investigate the influence of management competency on performance of family planning program in Kuresoi North Sub-County, Nakuru County, Kenya. The target population in the study was women of reproductive age in 33,482 households distributed in the four Wards of Kuresoi North Sub-County and 19 health management leaders in-charge of all government health facilities offering family planning services in the Sub-County. A sample size of 400 of women of reproductive age and 19 nursing officers in-charge of government health facilities was utilized. The data collection tools used were questionnaire, interview guide, and observation checklist for women of reproductive age and the interview guide for the health facility managers. The research study adopted stratified sampling method. Qualitative data was analyzed according to themes and patterns and then summarizing the data and linking it to objectives and hypothesis. The study findings indicate that there is moderate management efficiency, exhibited pertaining to family planning in the dispensaries and health centers located in Kuresoi North Sub-County. Further findings exhibited that there was a significant and strong positive individual correlation between management competency and performance of family planning program in Kuresoi North Sub-County. Finally, the study findings also exhibited that there is a significant positive relationship between management competency and performance of family planning program in Kuresoi North Sub-County and it predicted the performance of family planning programmes. in Kuresoi North Sub-County.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. [S. Cohen and W. Yu. Rockville, “The Concentration and persistence in the level of health expenditures over time: Estimates for the U.S. population 2009-2010,” MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Nov, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  2. Implementation Guideline for Kenya Quality Model of Health (KQMH) Care, Ministry of Medical services and Ministry of Public Health and sanitation, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  3. D. M. Woods, R. Baker, and K. Charles, “Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study,” BMJ Qual Saf, vol, 23, no 2, pp 106-15, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  4. D. W. Curry, J. Rattan, J. J. Nzau, and K. Giri, “Delivering High-Quality Family Planning Services in Crisis-Affected Settings I: Program Implementation,” Global Health: Science and Practice, vol 3, no 1, pp 14–24, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  5. M. West, K. Armit, L. Loewenthal, R. Eckert, T. West, A. Lee, (April, 2015). Leadership and leadership development in health care: The evidence base. Available from http:ororwww.kingsfund.org.ukorpublicationsorleadership-and-leadership-developmenthealth-care What are patients’ knowledge, expectation and experience of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of their tendinopathies? A qualitative study
     Google Scholar
  6. C. Wong, C. G. Cummings, and L. Ducharme, “The relationship between nursing leadership and patient outcomes: A systematic review update,” J Nurs Manag, vol 21, no5, pp 709–24, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  7. H. Dickinson, C. Ham, and I. Snelling, “Are we there yet ? Models of medical leadership and their effectiveness, An exploratory study,” Final report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  8. G. Veronesi, I. Kirkpatrick, F. Vallascas, “Clinicians on the board: what difference does it make?,” Soc Sci Med, vol 77. pp 147-55, (2013)
     Google Scholar
  9. C. A. Wong, and H. K. Laschinger, “Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of empowerment,” J Adv Nurs, vol 69, no 4, pp 947–59, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  10. A. C. Arroliga, C. Huber, J. D. Myers, J. P. Dieckert, and D. Wesson, “Leadership in health care for the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities,” Am J Med, vol 127, no 3, pp 246–249, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  11. T. C. Okech, N. W. Wawire, and T. K. Mburu, “Contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Kenya’s city slums” International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  12. G. Saad, & S. Siha, "Managing quality: critical links and a contingency model", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 1146-1164, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  13. S. Lombardo, and R. Kvålshaugen, (2014). Constraint-Shattering Practices and Creative Action in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613517597.
     Google Scholar
  14. A. Sabbaghi, and G. Vaidyanathan, “SWOT Analysis and Theory of Constraint in Information Technology Projects,” Information Systems Education Journal, vol 2, no 23, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  15. A. Donabedian, “Evaluating the quality of medical care,” The Milbank Quarterly, vol 83, no 4, pp :691-729, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  16. V. S Raleigh, and C, Foot, Getting the Measure of Quality: Opportunities and Challenges, London: King’s Fund, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  17. J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  18. J. F. Molina-Azorin, “Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills,” European Journal of Management and Business Economics, vol 25, pp 37-38, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  19. A. Mitchell, “A review of the mixed methods, pragmatism and abduction techniques,” The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, vol 16, pp 103-116, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  20. J. W. Creswell, and V. L Plano-Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research,2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  21. D. L. Morgan, pragmatism as a paradigm for social research, Qualitative Inquiry, vol 20, no 8, pp 1045–1053, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  22. C. Robson, Real World Research, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  23. J. Morse, and L. Niehaus, Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  24. T. D. Nguyen, M. Shih, D. Srivastava, S. Tirthapura, and B. Xu, "Stratified Random Sampling from Streaming and Stored Data," Electrical and Computer Engineering Conference Papers, Posters and Presentations, 2019.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)