##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Shareholders with a large stake in a company may have greater incentives to monitor and take corrective actions, because they partially internalize the benefits from their monitoring effort. This study examined the impact of concentrated ownership on audit quality as measured by auditors’ tenure of 36 manufacturing companies quoted on the NSE. The sample size was selected using non-probability method of sampling from a population of 185 quoted companies on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The study adopted experimental research design and secondary data extracted from the audited annual reports of the firms under consideration covering a period 2007 to 2017 was used. The study found that ownership concentration has no statistically significant impact on auditors’ tenure. The study therefore recommends that ownership concentration should be maintained at a controllable level; the insignificant impact of concentrated ownership on auditors’ tenure as evident in this study might be the result of inefficient monitoring by large owners. But when ownership concentration by large ownership is maintained at a controlling level, firm values and other performance parameters become positive which may be as a result of an effective internal control system against the expropriation of resources and exploitation of minority shareholders by large shareholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. M. Yahyazadehfar, H. Shababi, and S.S. Hosseini, “Investigation of relationship between ownership concentration and auditing fees in listed firms of Tehran Stock Exchange,” International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 891-901, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  2. S. Mitra, M. Hossain, and D. Deis, “The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit fees,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 28, pp. 257-285, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  3. A. Gomes, “Going public without governance: Managerial reputation effects,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 615-646, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Niskanen, Karjalainen and J. Niskanen, “The role of auditing in small, private family firms: Is it about quality and credibility?,” Family Business Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 230-245, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  5. K. A. Al-Rawash, and S. Z. Alzeaideen, “The effect of ownership structure and corporate debt on audit quality: Evidence from Jordan,” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 51-58, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  6. E. F, Fama, and M. C. Jensen, “Separation of ownership and control,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 327-349, 1983.
     Google Scholar
  7. E. M. R. Sayedeh, S. Hamid and V. P. Hashem, “The impact of audit quality and ownership structure on earnings management on Tehran Stock Exchange,” International Business Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1827–1832, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  8. E. M. Al-Matari, Y. A. Al-Matari and S. A. Saif, “Ownership structure, audit quality and firm performance moderating and direct-effect models: An empirical study,” Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 28-35, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  9. A. A. Berle and G. C. Means, The modern corporation and private property, MacMillan publishing Co, New York, 1932.
     Google Scholar
  10. A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, “Large shareholders and corporate control,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, pp. 461–488, 1986.
     Google Scholar
  11. P. Aghion, and J. Tirole, “Formal real authority in organizations,” Journal of Political Economics, vol. 105, no. 1, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  12. J. Cremer, “Arm’s length,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  13. C. Bai, Q. Liu, J. Lu, F. M. Song and J. Zhang, “An empirical study of corporate governance and market valuation in China,” Economic research journal, vol. 2, pp. 84-110, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  14. S. Johnson, R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer, “Tunneling,” American economic review, vol. 90, pp. 22- 27, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  15. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). A framework for audit quality, key elements that create environment for audit quality. [Online]. Available: https://www.ifac.org 2014
     Google Scholar
  16. KPMG, “Audit point of view: What is audit quality,” International Cooperative 1-2, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  17. T. Donaldson and L. E. Preston, “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–91, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  18. R. E. Freeman, A. C. Wicks and B. Parmar, “Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited,” Organization Science, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 364–369, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  19. G. Kiel and G. Nicholson, Boards that work: A new guide for directors, Sydney: McGraw Hill, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  20. R. E. Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman, 1984.
     Google Scholar
  21. P. Clarkson, “In recognition of dual relationships”, Transactional Analysis Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 32-38, 1994.
     Google Scholar
  22. S. O. Abu, T. Nyor, and J. Okpanachi, “Institutional ownership and Block hold ownership and audit quality of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria,” Journal of finance and Accounting, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15-26. 2018.
     Google Scholar
  23. M. A. Jusoh, A. Ahmad and B. Omar, “Managerial ownership, audit quality and firm performance in Malaysian,” International Journal of Arts and Commerce, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 45-58, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  24. I. Peyman, and L. Mina, “The effect of corporate governance mechanisms on auditing quality of firms accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange,” Applied Mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 58-63, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  25. A. Rahman Khan, D. Mahboob Hossain and J. Siddiqui, “Corporate ownership concentration and audit fees: The case of an emerging economy,” Advances in Accounting, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 125- 131, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  26. A. Sanda, A. S. Mikailu and T. Garba, “Corporate governance mechanisms and firm financial performance in Nigeria,” AERC Research Paper 149, African economic research consortium, Nairobi, pp. 1–47, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  27. A. T. Babatolu, O. O. Aigienohuwa, and E. Uniamikogbo, “Auditor’s independence and audit quality: A study of selected deposit money banks in Nigeria,” International Journal of Finance and Accounting, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13-21, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  28. A. O. Okolie, “Audit Tenure, Audit Independence and Accrual–based Earnings Management of Quoted Companies in Nigeria,” European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance Research., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63-90, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  29. S. I. Adeniyi and L. G. Mieseigha, “Audit tenure: An assessment of its effects on audit quality in Nigeria,” International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  30. M. L. Defond, “The association between changes in client firm agency cost and auditor switching,” Auditing, vol. 11, no. 16, 1992.
     Google Scholar
  31. Q. Zureigat, “The effect of ownership structure on audit quality: Evidence from Jordan,” International Journal of Business Social Science, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 38-46, 2011.
     Google Scholar