A Risk Management Model Applicable To The Administration Of The Research, Development And Innovation (RD&I) Processes From Occidental Amazon



Abstract Views
1051

Downloads
642

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jun 16, 2020
Published Jun 25, 2020
10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.3.374

Abstract viewed = 1051 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The process of research, development and innovation (RD&I) is very important for the technological growth of a nation. Because they are activities with a considerable level of uncertainty, they require a lot of planning, with the execution of projects and a robust risk management. In the Western Amazon is one of the largest industrial parks in Brazil, subsidized by tax benefits from Law No. 8,387 / 1991, which also establishes the obligation for companies that manufacture computer goods to allocate part of their revenue for the implementation of projects of Research and Development. Studies show that the results of RD&I activities carried out in the Western Amazon, as well as in Brazil, are deficient. Thus, this work aimed to present a risk management model that can contribute to a better management of processes related to RD&I in the Western Amazon. The methodology consisted of a scientific research of applied nature, whose data were collected through bibliographic, documentary and case study research, and later they were analyzed in a qualitative way. It was concluded that the risk management model presented here is a practical manual composed of a detailed procedural rite of great value for managers who want to implement a risk management program in their organizations and, specifically in the case of SUFRAMA, represents a support instrument to guide the management of risks inherent to RD&I activities developed in the Western Amazon,  enhancing its results and contributing to expand the technological development of the region.

Keywords: risk management; research, development and innovation; Western Amazon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Institute of Applied Economic research. “Radar: technology, production and foreign trade”. Directorate of Studies and Sectoral Policies of Innovation and Infrastructure - N. 48 (Dec.2016). Brasilia: IPEA, 2016. Available from: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/radar/20170110_radar_48.pdf, accessed: 13/05/2019.
     Google Scholar
  2. Valle, André. “Fundamentals of project management”. André Bittencourt of Valle... [et. Al]. – 3 ed. - Rio de Janeiro: FGV Publishing House, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  3. Brazil. Law No. 8,387 of December 30, 1991. It gives new wording to § 1 of art. 3rd to the arts. 7 and 9 of Decree-Law No. 288 of February 28, 1967, to the caput of art. 37 of Decree-Law No. 1,455 of April 7, 1976 and art. 10 of Law No. 2,145 of December 29, 1953, and makes other arrangements. Available in: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8387.htm, accessed on 10/12/2019.
     Google Scholar
  4. ABNT (2009) ABNT NBR ISO 31000 Risk Management - Principles and Guidelines. Brazilian Association of Technical Standards.
     Google Scholar
  5. “A guide to the project management body of knowledge” (PMBOK guide), Fifth edition. Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc., 2013. ISBN: 978 1935589-67-9.
     Google Scholar
  6. Cavalcante, Marcelo Clinger Vieira. “Research and development as a tool of national public policies of science and technology: a case study of the efficiency of computer law in the Manaus free zone through data envelopment analysis”. Dissertation presented to the graduate program in production engineering of the Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM). Manaus - AM, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  7. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. OECD Publishing: Paris, 2015. Available from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en>. Accessed: 21 Apr. 2019.
     Google Scholar
  8. Varella, Sergio R. D. Medeiros, Jefferson B. S. Junior, Mauro T. S. “The Development of Schumpeterian Innovation Theory”. XXXII National Meeting of Production Engineering Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility: The Contributions of Production Engineering Bento Gonçalves, RS, Brazil, October 15-18, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  9. Schumpeter, J. “The Theory of Economic Development”. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1934.
     Google Scholar
  10. Angeloni, M., Homma, R., Athayde Filho, L., Cosentino. “Information and Knowledge Management in Research and Development Projects – A Case Study”. Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management (IJSM), North America, 15, Mar. 2016. Available at: <http://www.revistaiberoamericana.org/ojs/index.php/ibero/article/view/2299>. Date accessed: 19 Jul. 2019.
     Google Scholar
  11. OECD, OECD and FINEP (2015). Organization for Cooperation and Development, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Financier of Studies and Projects (2005) - Oslo Manual - Proposal of Guidelines for Data Collection and Interpretation on Innovation. Financier of Studies and Projects. Rio de Janeiro: ART/FINEP. Available in: http://www.finep.gov.br/images/a-finep/biblioteca/manual_de_oslo.pdf,accessed: 12/01/2020.
     Google Scholar
  12. Brazil. Law 11.196/05 - Law of Good, of November 21, 2005. It deals with the granting of tax incentives to legal entities. Available in: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2005/lei/l11196.htm,accessed: 12/01/2020.
     Google Scholar
  13. Pinheiro, Andréia Azevedo et al. “Methodology for managing research and development projects focused on products: a proposal”. Rev. Adm. Public [online]. 2006, vol.40, n.3 [cited 2020-06-14], pp.457-478. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122006000300007&lng=en&nrm=iso>. ISSN 1982-3134. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122006000300007.
     Google Scholar
  14. Doi, Anderson. “Management of corporate risks in small and medium-sized enterprises. Analysis of a national it company”. Dissertation presented to the Graduate Program in Professional Master's degree in entrepreneurship of the Department of Administration of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (USP). São Paulo - SP, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  15. Raz, T.; Rilson, D. “A comparative review of risk management standards”. Risk Management: In the International Journal, v. 7, n.4, p.53-66, 2005. Disponible in: http://www.risk-doctor.com/pdf-files-issue.pdf. Accessed: 30/07/2019.
     Google Scholar
  16. IBGC – Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance. “Guidance for Corporate Risk Management”. São Paulo:IBGC, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  17. ISO Guide 73:2009 Risk management Vocabulary.
     Google Scholar
  18. Vieira, Darli R.; Vieira, Raimundo K.; Chain, Milena C.; Bravo, Alencar.; “Model for managing uncertainty in aeronautics projects”. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2017, available at: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJPLM.2017.087573, accessed: 14/01/2020.
     Google Scholar
  19. Foote, N.W., Galbraith, J., Hope, Q. and Miller, D. (2001) “Making solutions the answer”, The McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.84–93.
     Google Scholar
  20. Jaafari, A. (2001) “Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.89–101.
     Google Scholar
  21. Van den Bos, K. and Lind, E.A. (2002) “Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp.1–60.
     Google Scholar
  22. Ward, S. and Chapman, C. (2003) “Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.97–105.
     Google Scholar
  23. Purdy, G. (2010). “ISO 31000:2009—Setting a New Standard for Risk Management”. Risk Analysis, 30(6), 881–886. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01442.x, 27/08/2019.
     Google Scholar
  24. ABNT NBR ISO 31000:2018 - Risk Management - Guidelines. Brazilian Association of Technical Standards.
     Google Scholar
  25. Rovai, Ricardo Leonardo. “Structured model for risk management in projects: study of multiple cases” [thesis]. São Paulo:, Polytechnic School; 2005 [cited 2020-06-14]. doi:10.11606/T.3.2005.tde-01092006-180244.
     Google Scholar
  26. Brazil. Decree No. 6,008 of December 29, 2006. Regulates § 6 of art. 7 of Decree-Law No. 288, of February 28, 1967, art. 2 of Law No. 8,387 of December 30, 1991, and Art. 4º of Law No. 11,077, of December 30, 2004, which deal with the tax benefit granted to companies that produce computer goods in the Manaus Free Trade Zone that invest in research and development activities in the Amazon, and provides other measures. Available from: http://www.suframa.gov.br/download/legislacao/federal/DECRETO%20N%C2%BA%206008,%2029_dez_2006.pdf, accessed: 07/01/2020.
     Google Scholar
  27. Brazil. Resolution 71 of 6 May 2016. It regulates the fulfillment of obligations related to investments in research and development activities in the Western Amazon, established for companies that produce computer assets benefited under the Manaus Free Trade Zone.
     Google Scholar
  28. Brazil. Ministry of Transparency and Comptroller General of the Union. Risk Management Methodology. Brasília, DF, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  29. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of The Treadway Commission - COSO. Internal Control: Integrated Structure: Executive Summary and Structure. Translation: PriceWatherhouseCoopers and Institute of Internal Auditors of Brazil, São Paulo, 2013. Available from: <http://www.iiabrasil.org.br/new/2013/downs/coso/COSO_ICIF_2013_Sumario_Executivo.pdf>. Access: January/2020.
     Google Scholar
  30. Brazil. Court of Auditors of the Union. “TCU Risk Management Manual”. Brasília, DF, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  31. Bermejo, Paulo H. de Souza. et. al. “ForRisco: a practical guide for risk management in public institutions”. Brasília/DF: Editor Evobiz, 2019. Available in: https://issuu.com/next_unb/docs/ebook_forrisco_2a_edicao, accessed on 14/02/2020.
     Google Scholar
  32. Brazil. Court of Auditors of the Union. “10 steps to good risk management. Brasília: TCU, Secretariat of Methods and Support to External Control (Semec), 2018. 31 p.: il.
     Google Scholar