The The Effect of Corporate Governance Characteristics on Publication of Financial Statements on the Indonesia Stock Exchange



Abstract Views
555

Downloads
542

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 8, 2020
Published Jul 25, 2020
10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.4.423

Abstract viewed = 555 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study aims to analyze corporate governance towards the publication of financial statements on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The end of the financial year until the date of publication of the financial statements as a period of reporting time lag. Ownership composition, characteristics of directors and commissioners, and audit committee as a proxy for corporate governance. Proportional strata method for selecting a sample of 775 annual reports, for the period 2013-2014 from nine industry groups. Multiple regression analysis techniques, using control variables of size, performance, auditor quality, and type of industry. The results showed that ownership, board meetings, and audit committee meetings, as well as the number of commissioners and audit committees, had a significant effect on the issuance of issuers' audit reports. While the independence of directors and commissioners does not affect.spacing.

Keywords: corporate governance, publication financial statements, Indonesia stock excxhange

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bapepam and LK, Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan. 2011.
     Google Scholar
  2. G. Juanita and R. Satwiko, “Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Kepemilikan, Laba Rugi, Profitabilitas dan Solvabilitas terhadap Audit Report Lag,” J. Bisnis dan Akunt., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  3. N. P. Budiadnyani and N. M. D. Ratnadi, “Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan Pada Kecepatan Publikasi Laporan Keuangan Tahunan,” E-Jurnal Akunt. Univ. Udayana, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 520–537, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  4. J. Schmidt and M. S. Wilkins, “Bringing darkness to light: The influence of auditor quality and audit committee expertise on the timeliness of financial statement restatement disclosures,” Audit. A J. Pract. Theory, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 221–244, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  5. O. Abdelsalam and A. El-Masry, “The impact of board independence and ownership structure on the timeliness of corporate internet reporting of Irish-listed companies,” Manag. Financ., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 907–918, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  6. R. W. McGee and X. Yuan, “Corporate governance and the timeliness of financial reporting: an empirical study of the people’s republic of China,” 2008.
     Google Scholar
  7. R. H. Ashton, J. J. Willingham, and R. K. Elliott, “An Empirical Analysis of Audit Delay,” J. Account. Res., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 275–292, 1987.
     Google Scholar
  8. H. A. E. Afify, “Determinants of audit report lag : Does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt,” J. Appl. Account. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 56–86, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  9. KNKG, “Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia,” Jakarta, 2006. [Online]. Available: www.governance-indonesia.or.id.
     Google Scholar
  10. H. Abdullah and B. Valentine, “Fundamental and Ethics Theories of Corporate Governance,” Middle East. Financ. Econ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 88–96, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  11. A. Al Mamun, Q. R. Yasser, and M. A. Rahman, “A Discussion of the Suitability of Only One vs More than One Theory for Depicting Corporate Governance,” Mod. Econ., vol. 4, no. January, pp. 37–48, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  12. S. R. Ika and N. A. M. Ghazali, “Audit committee effectiveness and timeliness of reporting: Indonesian evidence,” Manag. Audit. J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 403–424, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  13. B. S. Bemby, Abukosim, Mukhtaruddin, and I. Mursidi, “Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Mechanism and Audit Delay: An Empirical Study on Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the Period of 2009-2011,” J. Mod. Account. Audit., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1454–1468, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  14. K. Apadore and M. M. Noor, “Determinants of Audit Report Lag and Corporate Governance in Malaysia,” Int. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 151–163, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  15. A. A. Aziz, F. Isa, and M. F. Abu, “Audit report lags of Federal Statutory Bodies in Malaysia,” in International Conference on Economics, Management and Development, 2014, pp. 73–78.
     Google Scholar
  16. U. J. B. Hashim and R. B. A. Rahman, “Audit report lag and the effectiveness of audit committee among Malaysian listed companies,” Int. Bull. Bus. Adm., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  17. Y. M. Hassan, “Determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Palestine,” J. Account. Emerg. Econ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  18. K. A. A. Daoud, K. N. I. K. Ismail, and N. A. Lode, “The impact of internal corporate governance on the timeliness of financial reports of Jordanian firms: Evidence using audit and management report lags,” Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 430–442, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  19. R. Eslami, A. Armin, and H. R. Jaz, “A Study on the Effect of Corporate Governance on the Timeliness of Financial Reports of Listed Firms on Tehran Stock Exchange,” Acad. J. Account. Econ. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 140–152, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  20. V. Ongore and P. K’Obonyo, “Effects of Selected Corporate Governance Characteristics on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Kenya,” Int.J.Econ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 99–122, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  21. D. Agustia, “Pengaruh Faktor Good Corporate Governance, Free Cash Flow, dan Leverage Terhadap Manajemen Laba,” J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 27–42, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  22. U. J. B. Hashim and R. B. A. Rahman, “Board independence, board diligence, board expertise and impact on audit report lag in Malaysian market,” Electron. copy, 2011, Accessed: Mar. 25, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=1717479.
     Google Scholar
  23. M. Aglietta, “Corporate governance and the long‐run investor,” Int. Rev. Appl. Econ., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 407–427, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  24. L. Abernathy, John, B. Beyer, A. Masli, and M. Stefaniak, Chad, “How the Source of Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Influences Financial Reporting Timeliness,” Curr. Issues Audit., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  25. J. Al-Ajmi, “Audit and reporting delays: Evidence from an emerging market,” Adv. Account., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 217–226, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  26. K. Alkhatib and Q. Marji, “Audit Reports Timeliness: Empirical Evidence from Jordan,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 62, pp. 1342–1349, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  27. S. P. Nelson and S. N. . Shukeri, “Corporate governance and audit report timeliness: evidence from Malaysia,” Res. Account. Emerg. Econ., vol. 11, no. 2011, pp. 109–127, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  28. Y. Li, D. Zhang, and X. Wang, “The Influence of Corporation Governance Structure on Internal Control Audit Report Lag: Evidence from China,” Account. Tax., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 101–115, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  29. A. Lambe, “Audit Committees step into the limelight,” Account. Ireland, Feb, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 48–51, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  30. H. Zhizhong, Z. Juan, S. Yanzhi, and X. Wenli, “Does corporate governance affect restatement of financial reporting? Evidence from China,” Nankai Bus. Rev. Int., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 289–302, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  31. J. L. Abernathy, B. Beyer, A. Masli, and C. Stefaniak, “The association between characteristics of audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness,” Adv. Account., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 283–297, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  32. A. Ezat, “The Impact of Corporate Governance on the Timeliness of Corporate Internet Reporting by Egyptian Listed Companies,” in Proceedings of the Plymouth Postgraduate Symposium, UniversityPlymouth UK., 2009, pp. 179–199.
     Google Scholar
  33. S. Owusu-Ansah and S. Leventis, “Timeliness of corporate annual financial reporting in Greece,” Eur. Account. Rev., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 273–287, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  34. S. Rachmawati, “Pengaruh Faktor Internal dan Eksternal Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Delay dan Timeliness,” J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  35. J. Lucyanda and S. P. Nura’ni, “Pengujian Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Audit Delay,” J. Akunt. Audit., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 128–149, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  36. H. Y. Lee, V. Mande, and M. Son, “A comparison of reporting lags of multinational and domestic firms,” J. Int. Financ. Manag. Account., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 28–56, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  37. S. Leventis, P. Weetman, and C. Caramanis, “Determinants of audit report lag: Some evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange,” J. Audit., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  38. L. J. Abbott, S. Parker, and G. F. Peters, “Internal audit assistance and external audit timeliness,” Audit. A J. Pract. Theory, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 3–20, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  39. S. Abidin and N. Ahmad-Zaluki, “Auditor industry specialism and reporting timeliness,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 65, pp. 873–878, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  40. H. Zhizhong, Z. Juan, S. Yanzhi, and X. Wenli, “Does corporate governance affect restatement of financial reporting? Evidence from China,” Nankai Bus. Rev. Int., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 289–302, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  41. A. Habib and M. B. U. Bhuiyan, “Audit firm industry specialization and the audit report lag,” J. Int. Accounting, Audit. Tax., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 32–44, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  42. K. A. A. Daoud, K. N. I. K. Ismail, and N. A. Lode, “The timeliness of financial reporting among jordanian companies: Do company and board characteristics, and audit opinion matter?,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 191–201, 2014.
     Google Scholar