Factors Affecting Continuance Intention of FinTech Payment among Millennials in Jakarta



Abstract Views
4063

Downloads
2224

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 19, 2020
Published Jul 30, 2020
10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.4.444

Abstract viewed = 4063 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The background of this research is related to a phenomenon of millennials who prefer to change their financial behavior into cashless transactions from cash-based transactions. Factors of benefits (economic benefits, seamless transactions, and convenience) and risks (financial risks, legal risks, security risks, and operational risks) experienced by millennials are examined to observe their effects on the continuance intention of financial technology (FinTech) payment. FinTech users are classified into two types, namely early adopters and late adopters. This study examines the variables of continuance intention of FinTech payment, economic benefits, seamless transactions, convenience, financial risks, legal risks, security risks, operational risks, perceived benefits, and perceived risks simultaneously and is the first to be conducted on millennials in Jakarta. The methodology used was the Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square. The data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 313 respondents. The results of this research show that convenience is the most influential benefit factor towards the continuance intention of FinTech payment. Operational risks are the only factor that do not significantly affect the continuance intention of FinTech payment. The differences between the effects of benefits and risks are found in both of the user types. The implication of this research is to further understand influential factors in millennials’ decisions to use FinTech payment services.

Keywords: Continuance Intention of FinTech Payment Millennials Perceived Benefits and Risks User Type

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak, Statistik gender tematik: profil generasi milenial indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  2. DBS, “Rahasia Perkembangan Fintech di Indonesia, Industri Digital yang Sedang Berkembang Pesat,” DBS, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.dbs.com/spark/index/id_id/site/pillars/2018-rahasia-perkembangan-fintech-di-indonesia-industri-digital-yang-sedang-berkembang-pesat.html.
     Google Scholar
  3. H. S. Ryu, “What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech?: the moderating effect of user type,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 541–569, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  4. L. P. Supratman, “Penggunaan Media Sosial oleh Digital Native,” J. ILMU Komun., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–60, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  5. F. Margaretha, “Dampak Electronic Banking terhadap Kinerja Perbankan Indonesia,” J. Keuang. dan Perbank., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 514–524, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  6. Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan, “Distribusi Simpanan Bank Umum Periode November 2018,” no. November, p. 5, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  7. A. Teja, “Indonesian Fintech Business : New Innovations or Foster and Collaborate in Business Ecosystems ? 2 . Literature Study and Hypothesis Development,” Asian J. Technol. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  8. I. Trinugroho, H. Sri, R. Sawitri, M. Juan, and S. Toro, “How Ready are People for Cashless Society?,” vol. 21, no. 040, pp. 105–112, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  9. N. J. Hanson-rasmussen and K. J. Lauver, “Environmental responsibility : millennial values and cultural dimensions,” 2017.
     Google Scholar
  10. J. Y. A. Leen, R. Thurasamy, and A. Omar, “Engaging Millennials in an evolving web environment: Some key points for e-retailers,” Bus. Strateg. Ser., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 111–117, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  11. D. K. C. Lee and G. S. Teo, “Emergence of Fintech and the Lasic Principles,” SSRN Electron. J., 2015.
     Google Scholar
  12. S. Okazaki and F. Mendez, “Exploring convenience in mobile commerce: Moderating effects of gender,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1234–1242, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  13. C. Kim, M. Mirusmonov, and I. Lee, “An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 310–322, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  14. A. Barakat and K. Hussainey, “Bank governance, regulation, supervision, and risk reporting: Evidence from operational risk disclosures in European banks,” Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., vol. 30, pp. 254–273, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  15. T. Escobar-Rodríguez and M. Romero-Alonso, “The acceptance of information technology innovations in hospitals: Differences between early and late adopters,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1231–1243, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  16. M. Tingchi Liu, J. L. Brock, G. Cheng Shi, R. Chu, and T. H. Tseng, “Perceived benefits, perceived risk, and trust: Influences on consumers’ group buying behaviour,” Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 225–248, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  17. H. Komulainen, S. Saraniemi, and P. Ulkuniemi, “End-customer value restructuring the financial service supply chain,” vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 709–720, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  18. A. Benlian and T. Hess, “Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 232–246, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  19. D. Chen, X. Liu, and C. Wang, “Social Trust and Bank Loan Financing: Evidence from China,” Abacus, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 374–403, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  20. S. Abramova and R. Böhme, “Perceived benefit and risk as multidimensional determinants of bitcoin use: A quantitative exploratory study,” 2016 Int. Conf. Inf. Syst. ICIS 2016, no. Zohar 2015, pp. 1–20, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  21. M. Annette, “The fintech revolution,” London Bus. Sch. Rev., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 50–53, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  22. E. Lee and B. Lee, “Herding behavior in online P2P lending: An empirical investigation,” Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 495–503, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  23. D. Belanche, L. V. Casaló, and C. Flavián, “Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 2019.
     Google Scholar
  24. L. Zavolokina, M. Dolata, and G. Schwabe, “FinTech – What’s in a Name?,” Thirty Seventh Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., pp. 1–16, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  25. Y. C. Shen, C. Y. Huang, C. H. Chu, and C. T. Hsu, “A benefit-cost perspective of the consumer adoption of the mobile banking system,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 497–511, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  26. C. I. Mbama and P. O. Ezepue, “Digital banking , customer experience and bank financial performance UK customers ’ perceptions,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 230–255, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  27. S. Forsythe, C. Liu, D. Shannon, and L. C. Gardner, “Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping,” J. Interact. Mark., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 55–75, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  28. A. W. Ng and B. K. B. Kwok, “Emergence of Fintech and cybersecurity in a global fi nancial centre Strategic approach by a regulator,” vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 422–434, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  29. W. Brammertz and A. I. Mendelowitz, “From digital currencies to digital fi nance : the case for a smart fi nancial contract standard,” 2017.
     Google Scholar
  30. H. Stewart and J. Jürjens, “Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany,” 2018.
     Google Scholar
  31. E. Y. Yildirim, G. Akalp, S. Aytac, and N. Bayram, “Factors influencing information security management in small- and medium-sized enterprises: A case study from Turkey,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 360–365, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  32. L. H. C. Pinochet, G. T. Diogo, E. L. Lopes, E. Herrero, and R. L. P. Bueno, “Propensity of contracting loans services from FinTech’s in Brazil,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1190–1214, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  33. P. G. Schierz, O. Schilke, and B. W. Wirtz, “Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis,” Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 209–216, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  34. A. Chockalingam, S. Dabadghao, and R. Soetekouw, “Strategic risk , banks , and Basel III : estimating economic capital requirements,” vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 225–246, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  35. A. Aloqab, F. Alobaidi, and B. Raweh, “Operational Risk Management in Financial Institutions: An Overview,” Bus. Econ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 11, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  36. H. Lee, H. Park, and J. Kim, “Why do people share their context information on social network services? a qualitative study and an experimental study on users’ behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 862–877, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  37. Y. Liu, Y. Yang, and H. Li, “A Unified Risk-Benefit Analysis Framework for Investigating Mobile Payment Adoption,” 2012 Int. Conf. Mob. Bus. Proc., p. Paper 20, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  38. K. Still, T. Huhtala, and S. Saraniemi, “FinTech as business and innovation ecosystems,” Proc. ISPIM Conf., no. December, pp. 1–12, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  39. M. Brody et al., “Three financial regulators issue reports on product and service innovations,” vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 84–91, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  40. N. Singh, S. Srivastava, and N. Sinha, “Consumer preference and satisfaction of M-wallets: a study on North Indian consumers,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 944–965, 2017.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)