##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the style of leadership and the creative of employee by acting as trusted mediators in communication. The standard pilot survey included 250 employees from four innovative sectors in Ghana. Several classifications of series were used to test the relationship, prior to multiple regressions, all general assumptions were validated and deemed appropriate. The validity and reliability of the search engines were also tested. The study found that creative workers were positively and more closely involved in changing the fashion of leadership in firms, while the style business was largely associated with creative workers. In addition, reliable communication bridges the bond between style of leadership and creativity of employee, which is why system leadership is more cohesive and mobile. It is believed that trust can increase the relationship between manager and staff.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Taylor, C.W., Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, 1988. 99.
     Google Scholar
  2. Levitt, T., Creativity is not enough. Harvard business review, 2002. 80: p. 137-144.
     Google Scholar
  3. Ellis, G., S. Morison, and J. Purdy, A new concept of interprofessional education in planning programmes: Reflections on healthy urban planning project. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 2008. 3(2): p. 75-93.
     Google Scholar
  4. Gilson, L.L. and C.E. Shalley, A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of management, 2004. 30(4): p. 453-470.
     Google Scholar
  5. Hultqvist, J., G. Melin, and K. Hyttinen, Ett innovativt småföretag: En marknadsanalys av energivisualiseringsbranschen. 2013.
     Google Scholar
  6. Senge, P.M., The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. 2006: Broadway Business.
     Google Scholar
  7. Kelly, J.R. and S.J. Karau, Entrainment of creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 1993. 24(2): p. 179-198.
     Google Scholar
  8. Mathur, A. and K. Singh, Foreign direct investment, corruption and democracy. Applied Economics, 2013. 45(8): p. 991-1002.
     Google Scholar
  9. Fortwengel, J., E. Schüßler, and J. Sydow, Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality? Creativity and Innovation Management, 2017. 26(1): p. 5-16.
     Google Scholar
  10. Mumford, M.D., et al., Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 2017. 28(1): p. 24-39.
     Google Scholar
  11. Zhou, J. and J.M. George, When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal, 2001. 44(4): p. 682-696.
     Google Scholar
  12. Shin, S.J. and J. Zhou, Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of management Journal, 2003. 46(6): p. 703-714.
     Google Scholar
  13. Amabile, T., GUIDEPOST: Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and a World of Surprises Guidepost Letter for Academy of Management Discoveries. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2019(ja).
     Google Scholar
  14. Hu, J., et al., Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2018. 103(3): p. 313.
     Google Scholar
  15. Menguc, B., S. Auh, and E. Shih, Transformational leadership and market orientation: Implications for the implementation of competitive strategies and business unit performance. Journal of business research, 2007. 60(4): p. 314-321.
     Google Scholar
  16. Birasnav, M., M. Albufalasa, and Y. Bader, The role of transformational leadership and knowledge management processes on predicting product and process innovation: An empirical study developed in Kingdom of Bahrain. Tékhne, 2013. 11(2): p. 64-75.
     Google Scholar
  17. Le, P.B. and H. Lei, How transformational leadership supports knowledge sharing. Chinese Management Studies, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  18. Le, P.B. and H. Lei, The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  19. Dovey, K., The role of trust in innovation. The Learning Organization, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  20. Ellonen, R., K. Blomqvist, and K. Puumalainen, The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  21. Cassell, C., et al., Exploring human resource management practices in small and medium sized enterprises. Personnel review, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  22. Judge, T.A. and J.D. Kammeyer-Mueller, Implications of core self-evaluations for a changing organizational context. Human Resource Management Review, 2011. 21(4): p. 331-341.
     Google Scholar
  23. Thiry, M. and M. Deguire, Recent developments in project-based organisations. International journal of project management, 2007. 25(7): p. 649-658.
     Google Scholar
  24. Kuhnert, K.W. and P. Lewis, Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. Academy of Management review, 1987. 12(4): p. 648-657.
     Google Scholar
  25. Lord, R.G., et al., Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017. 102(3): p. 434.
     Google Scholar
  26. Rigby, C.S. and R.M. Ryan, Self-determination theory in human resource development: New directions and practical considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2018. 20(2): p. 133-147.
     Google Scholar
  27. Bass, B.M. and M. Bass Bernard, Leadership and performance beyond expectations. 1985.
     Google Scholar
  28. Andrle, V., Managerial Power in the Soviet Union: Saxon House, 1976.-177 s.-Bibliografi. 1976: Saxon House; Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
     Google Scholar
  29. Kark, R., B. Shamir, and G. Chen, The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of applied psychology, 2003. 88(2): p. 246.
     Google Scholar
  30. Ismail, A., et al., An empirical study of the relationship between transformational leadership, empowerment and organizational commitment. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2011. 2(1): p. 89.
     Google Scholar
  31. Bednall, T.C., et al., Innovative behaviour: how much transformational leadership do you need? British Journal of Management, 2018. 29(4): p. 796-816.
     Google Scholar
  32. Herrmann, D. and J. Felfe, Effects of leadership style, creativity technique and personal initiative on employee creativity. British Journal of Management, 2014. 25(2): p. 209-227.
     Google Scholar
  33. Colbert, A.E. and L. Witt, The role of goal-focused leadership in enabling the expression of conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009. 94(3): p. 790.
     Google Scholar
  34. Jones, J.R. and J.K. Harter, Race effects on the employee engagement-turnover intention relationship. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2005. 11(2): p. 78-88.
     Google Scholar
  35. Foster, C. and L. Harris, Easy to say, difficult to do: diversity management in retail. Human Resource Management Journal, 2005. 15(3): p. 4-17.
     Google Scholar
  36. Jung, D.I. and B.J. Avolio, Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of organizational Behavior, 2000. 21(8): p. 949-964.
     Google Scholar
  37. Mayer, R.C. and J.H. Davis, The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of applied psychology, 1999. 84(1): p. 123.
     Google Scholar
  38. Gillespie, N.A. and L. Mann, Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of managerial psychology, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  39. Tian, Y., K. Govindan, and Q. Zhu, A system dynamics model based on evolutionary game theory for green supply chain management diffusion among Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014. 80: p. 96-105.
     Google Scholar
  40. Dirks, K.T. and D.L. Ferrin, Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of applied psychology, 2002. 87(4): p. 611.
     Google Scholar
  41. Runco, M.A., S. Acar, and N. Cayirdag, A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2017. 24: p. 242-249.
     Google Scholar
  42. Bass, B. and B. Avolio, MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. 1995: Mind Garden.
     Google Scholar
  43. Zhang, X. and K.M. Bartol, The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: A curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied psychology, 2010. 95(5): p. 862.
     Google Scholar
  44. Mumford, M.D., et al., Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The leadership quarterly, 2002. 13(6): p. 705-750.
     Google Scholar