The Role of Motivation Among IT professionals To Foster Innovation: SMEs Focus
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
In today's fast-paced digital world outperforming competitors and achieving success becomes utterly challenging for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). The rapid speed of technological change can threaten established industries and undermine existing businesses. By effectively harnessing innovation, businesses can open-up new markets and develop new ways to accommodate the needs of existing customers. Countless research findings reveal that innovation is one of the most essential factors to ensure strategic efficiency and effectiveness in SMEs. Human resources play an integral part in attaining company’s goals and objectives. By motivating and encouraging employees to be more innovative, companies can quickly reap the benefits of competitive marketplace. In addition, employees can become a great source of creative and innovative ideas for future endeavors. In this rapidly changing environment, managers should reveal high levels of creativity in offering a plethora of motivational incentives to employees. Increasing employee enthusiasm, motivation and personal commitment remain one of the most enduring and challenging tasks that managers must tackle. Present paper addresses the issue of motivation among Information Technologies (further in the text IT) professionals in fostering innovation. The aim of the paper is to determine the role and significance of motivation in encouraging innovative and creative activities among IT professionals working in the small and medium sized enterprises. The objective of the research is to find the linkage between IT employee’s motivation and their contribution to innovation.
Downloads
References
-
Andersen, N., Murphy, T. Börsch, A. (2016). Nothing for Money. A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Motivation. Deloitte Review, 18, 70-85.
Google Scholar
1
-
Banuri, S., Dankova, K. & Keefer, Ph. (2017). It's not all fun and games: Feedback, task motivation, and effort, Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioral and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Google Scholar
2
-
Breen, J., & Demediuk, P. (2003). Developing Strategies to Overcome Challenges Faced by SMEs in Accessing Government Procurement Markets in the Asia-Pacific Region. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). Retrieved December 01, 2018, from https://www.apec.org/-/media/APEC/Publications/2003/9/Developing-Strategies-to-Overcome-Challenges-Faced-by-Small-and-Medium-Enterprises-SMEs-in-Accessing/03_cti_gpeg_SME_Workshop_Final_Report.pdf.
Google Scholar
3
-
Browne, R. (2018). 70% of people globally work remotely at least once a week, study says. CNBC. Retrieved November 21, 2018, from https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/30/70-percent-of-people-globally-work-remotely-at-least-once-a-week-iwg-study.html
Google Scholar
4
-
Burn, J., Couger, J.D. & Ma, L. (1992). Motivating IT professionals. The Hong Kong challenge. Information & Management 22 (1992) 269-280.
Google Scholar
5
-
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Garrad, L. (2017, December 05). If You Want to Motivate Employees, Stop Trusting Your Instincts. Retrieved November 25, 2018, from https://hbr.org/2017/02/if-you-want-to-motivate-employees-stop-trusting-your-instincts.
Google Scholar
6
-
Couger, J.D. & Zawacki, R.A. (1980). Motivating and Managing Computer Personnel, Wiley, New York.
Google Scholar
7
-
Croucher, R. and Kelliher, C. (2005), "The right to request flexible working in Britain: the law and organizational realities", European Journal of Comparative Law and Industrial Relations, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 503-29.
Google Scholar
8
-
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256406.
Google Scholar
9
-
Dobbs, M.; Hamilton, R. T. (2006). Small business growth: recent evidence and new directions, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research 13(5): 296–321.
Google Scholar
10
-
Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Leader to Leader, 1998(9), 01-15. doi:10.1002/ltl.40619980906).
Google Scholar
11
-
EBRD (2014). Drivers of Innovation. Retrieved December 02, 2018, from https://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/transition/tr14c.pdf.
Google Scholar
12
-
Ertürk, A., & Vurgun, L. (2015). Retention of IT professionals: Examining the influence of empowerment, social exchange, and trust. Journal of Business Research 68 (1), 34-46.
Google Scholar
13
-
Euro statistics website: ec.europa.eu/Eurostat.
Google Scholar
14
-
European commission (2018). Support to innovation. Retrieved December 02, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/cip/eip/innovation/index_en.htm.
Google Scholar
15
-
Forsman, H. (2015). Small firms as innovators: From innovation to sustainable growth. London: Imperial College Press.
Google Scholar
16
-
Geister, S., Konradt, U. & Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of Process Feedback on Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance in Virtual Teams. Small Group Research. 37. 459-489. doi: 10.1177/1046496406292337.
Google Scholar
17
-
Hill, E. J., & Civian, J. T. (Eds.). (2008). Investigating workplace flexibility using a multi-organization database: A collaboration of academics and practitioners [Special issue]. Community, Work, and Family, 11, 1–242. doi:10.1080/13668800802172576.
Google Scholar
18
-
Innovative People (2001). Mobility of Skilled Personnel in National Innovation Systems. OECD.
Google Scholar
19
-
Katarina Košmrlj & Klemen Širok & Borut Likar (2015). The Art of Managing Innovation Problems and Opportunities, Faculty of Management Koper Monograph Series, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, number 978-961-266-184-7, August.
Google Scholar
20
-
Koudelková, P., & Milichovský, F. (2015). Successful innovation by motivation. Verslas: Teorija Ir Praktika, 16(3), 223-230. doi:10.3846/btp.2015.472.
Google Scholar
21
-
Kowal, J. & Roztocki, N. (2015). Job satisfaction of IT professionals in Poland: does business competence matter? Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16:5, 995-1012.
Google Scholar
22
-
Langfred, C. W. (2007). The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50,885–900.
Google Scholar
23
-
Madhusudan, P. (2018). Companies that use technology in the workplace to motivate employees. Retrieved November 16, 2018, from https://www.peoplematters.in/article/employee-relations/companies-that-use-technology-in-the-workplace-to-motivate-employees.
Google Scholar
24
-
Marcati, A.; Guido, G.; Peluso, A. M. (2008). The role of SME entrepreneurs’ innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations, Research Policy 37(9): 1579–1590.
Google Scholar
25
-
Murphy, M. (2016). Three Tools to Inspire Innovation from Your Employees. Forbes. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/markmurphy/2016/10/16/3-tools-to-inspire-innovation-from-your-employees/#ee1e3886caef.
Google Scholar
26
-
Nada, Nader, (2010), “A Framework for Measuring the Management of Innovation”, The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, Volume V.
Google Scholar
27
-
Nohria, Nitin, Boris Groysberg, and Linda-Eling Lee (2008). Employee Motivation: A Powerful New Model. HBS Centennial Issue Harvard Business Review 86, nos. 7/8 (July–August 2008): 78–84.
Google Scholar
28
-
OECD and Eurostat (1995), “Manual on the Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to S&T – Canberra Manual”, OECD, Paris.
Google Scholar
29
-
Puchta, D., Schneider, F., Haigner, S., Wakolbinger, F., Jenewein, S. (2010). The Berlin Creative Industries. An Empirical Analysis of Future Key Industries. 1st Edition, Gabler Verlag.
Google Scholar
30
-
Schumpeter J. A., (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
31
-
Statista (2018). Global market size of outsourced services from 2000 to 2017. Retrieved December 01, 2018, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/189788/global-outsourcing-market-size/.
Google Scholar
32
-
The World Bank (2015). Portfolio of Innovative Ideas on SME Growth and Entrepreneurship. Retrieved November 27, 2018, from http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Development Research Group/SMEIdeasExecutiveSummariesv2.pdf.
Google Scholar
33
-
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2018). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Hoboken: Wiley.
Google Scholar
34
-
Tiwari, Rajnish and Buse, Stephan, Barriers to Innovation in SMEs: Can the Internationalization of R&D Mitigate Their Effects? (October 1, 2007). Proceedings of the First European Conference on Knowledge for Growth: Role and Dynamics of Corporate R&D - CONCORD 2007, October 8-9, 2007, Seville, Spain. Tetrieved November 20, 2018 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1583446.
Google Scholar
35
-
Tricomi, E. & DePasque, S. (2016), The Role of Feedback in Learning and Motivation, in Sung-il Kim , Johnmarshall Reeve , Mimi Bong (ed.) Recent Developments in Neuroscience Research on Human Motivation (Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 19) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.175 – 202.
Google Scholar
36
-
Tsai, T., Zhou, C., & Cheng, B. (2007). Internal Networking and Organizational Capability: Towards a New Perspective of the Firm. Journal of General Management, 33(2), 25–40. doi:10.1177/030630700703300203.
Google Scholar
37
-
Utterback, J. M. (2008). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
38
-
Wynekoop, J. & Walz, D. (1998). Revisiting the Perennial Question: Are IS People Different? Data Base. 29. 62-72.
Google Scholar
39
-
Yang A. J., (2004), Research on promoting technology innovation of SMEs, Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology, Vol.17, Issue 3, pp. 99-102.
Google Scholar
40
-
Куприянов, Я.Е. (2006). Взаимозависимость личных конструкторов и профессиональной мотивации у специалистов в области информационных технологий. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата психологических наук. Москва, 2006. (in Russian).
Google Scholar
41