##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Worldwide public sector and private sector put more effort in promotion of good environment for conducting monitoring and evaluation to the project conducted within their organization for the purpose of increase transparency, strengthen accountability, and improve organization performance. The study aims to determine the role of Monitoring and Evaluation systems on the Organizational performance and to examine resource monitoring and evaluation affect organization performance. A case of Tanzania Airport Authority. The study deployed descriptive quantitative research design, the study used Slovenes formula to obtain sample size of 187 from targeted population was 350 employees of TAA located in Ilala Municipality and purposively sampling was used. Questionnaire, and documents reviewed were used as the research instruments for collecting data needed in this study. The study uses multiple regression analysis models to test the relationship between monitoring and evaluation systems on organizational performances. The study concluded that monitoring and Evaluation systems improves organization performance in Tanzania and recommended that any organization(both private and public) should employ constant improvement in monitoring and Evaluation system in order to reach organization For the very rationale monthly time set of data has been approved from Jan 2014 to Dec 2019. The investigative outline contains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Menone, S., Karl, J., &Wignaraja, K. (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results. New York: UNDP Evaluation Office.
     Google Scholar
  2. Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2010). Planning and designing useful evaluations. Handbook of practical program evaluation, 19(5).
     Google Scholar
  3. Naidoo, I. A. (2011). The role of monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance in South Africa: A case study of the Department of Social Development. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.
     Google Scholar
  4. Fu, C. Y., Xie, X., Huang, J. J., Zhang, T., Wu, Q. Y., Chen, J. N., & Hu, H. Y. (2010).Monitoring and evaluation of removal of pathogens at municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 61(6), 1589-1599.
     Google Scholar
  5. Mackay, K. (2008). Helping countries build government monitoring and evaluation systems: World Bank Contribution to Evidence-based Policy Making. The role of monitoring and evaluation in Evidence-based policy making. Geneva: UNICEF.
     Google Scholar
  6. Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
     Google Scholar
  7. Mleke, M. N., & Dida, M. A. (2020). A Survey of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Government Projects in Tanzania: A Case of Health Projects.
     Google Scholar
  8. Guzmán, M., Irarrázaval, I., & De los Rios, B. (2014). Monitoring and evaluation system: The case of Chile 1990-2014. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
     Google Scholar
  9. Görgens, M., &Kusek, J. Z. (2010). Making monitoring and evaluation systems work: A capacity development tool kit. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
     Google Scholar
  10. Tukwayo, P. C. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of the staff performance management system in the Department of Social Development: a case study of Eerste River Office (Doctoral Dissertation, Unpublished). Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
     Google Scholar
  11. Govender, I. G. (2013). Monitoring and evaluation systems for enhancing governance and government legitimacy in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 48(1): 811-823.
     Google Scholar
  12. Raimondo, E. (2016). What difference does good monitoring & evaluation make to World Bank project performance? Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
     Google Scholar
  13. Khalid, K., Abdullah, H. H., & Kumar M, D. (2012). Get along with quantitative research process. International Journal of Research in Management, 2(2): 15-29.
     Google Scholar
  14. Wario, W., &Khalfan.M. (2015). Principles, Methods and Practices of Social Science Research. Zanzibar: Sumait University Press, Zanzibar.
     Google Scholar
  15. Churchill, D. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Market research. Methodological Foundations, 2.
     Google Scholar