##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

PT Bank BNI Syariah with a core capital of 4.4 trillion rupiahs, has a roadmap design to move up to BUKU III bank in 2020. One of the requirements to become a BUKU III bank is to have a core capital of 5 trillion rupiahs. With the current existing core capital, the company needs additional funding to meet those requirements. Inorganic Strategy is considered as the best option to add the company’s core capital. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, the author calculates the best possible Inorganic Strategy alternatives for the company, resulting in Initial Public Offering as the best alternatives. Thus, the company valuation is calculated to determine the fair value of the company for IPO. The company equity posture after IPO will be PT. Bank Negara Indonesia, Tbk. (79,95%), PT. BNI Life (0,05%) and public (20,00%). The company offered the share price at Rp 800 per share. Total equity gained after the public offering will be Rp 2,001 trillion, thus the new core capital of the company is Rp 6,4 trillion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Annual Report. (2015-2019). PT Bank BNI Syariah
     Google Scholar
  2. Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of any Asset. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  3. Gitman, L. a. (2015). Principles of Managerial Finance 14th ed. Boston: Pearson.
     Google Scholar
  4. Hitt, Michael A. et al. (2010). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization.
     Google Scholar
  5. Humphrey, Albert. (2005). SWOT Analysis for Management Consulting. SRI Alumni Newsletter.
     Google Scholar
  6. Oguztimur, Senay. (2019). Why Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Transport Problems? Beşiktaş/İstanbul – Turkey: Yıldız Technical University Department of City and Regional Planning
     Google Scholar
  7. Porter, M. E. (1989). How Competitive Force Shape Strategy. In M. E. Porter, Readings in Strategic Management (pp. 133-143). London: Palgrave.
     Google Scholar
  8. Saaty, T. L., & Peniwati, K. (2008). Group Decision Making: Drawing Out and Reconciling Difference. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
     Google Scholar