##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The aim of this study is to examines the causal relationship between government revenues and expenditures in Algeria during the period 1990 to 2019. Data properties were analyzed to determine their stationarity using the Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test, Phillips-Perron test and Kwiatkowski, Phillips, Schmidt, Shin (KPSS) test, as well as the Granger Causality Test (1969) of showing the direction. The results show that there is unidirectional causal relationship between government expenditure and revenue with the direction of causality running from government revenues to expenditures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Sere, K. A. The causal and cointegration relationship between government revenue and government expenditure: a case of South Africa from 1980 2015 (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South Africa), Mafikeng Campus). 2016, p1.
     Google Scholar
  2. Kaya, A., & Şen, H. How to achieve and sustain fiscal discipline in Turkey: Rising Taxes, reducing government spending or a combination of both? Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy (RJFP), 4(1), 1-26. 2013, p5.
     Google Scholar
  3. Obioma, E. C., & Ozughalu, U. M. An examination of the relationship between government revenue and government expenditure in Nigeria: Cointegration and causality approach. Economic and Financial Review, 48(2), 35-57. 2010, p36.
     Google Scholar
  4. Mutascu, M. Government revenues and expenditures in the East European economies: A bootstrap panel granger causality approach. Eastern European Economics, 54(6), 2016, 489-502.
     Google Scholar
  5. Mehrara, M., Pahlavani, M., & Elyasi, Y. Government revenue and government expenditure nexus in Asian countries: Panel cointegration and causality. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 199-207. 2011, p199.
     Google Scholar
  6. Takumah, W. The dynamic causal relationship between government revenue and government expenditure nexus in Ghana. 2014, p3.
     Google Scholar
  7. Champita, M. Causality between Government Revenue and Expenditure: Empirical Evidence from Zambia. Zambia Social Science Journal, 6(1), 2016, p50.
     Google Scholar
  8. Lojanica, N. Government expenditure and government revenue–The causality on the example of the republic of Serbia. In Management International Conference, 2015, pp. 79-90.
     Google Scholar
  9. Baghestani, H., and R. McNown. "Do Revenues or Expenditures Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria?" Southern Economic Journal 60, 1994, 311-322.
     Google Scholar
  10. Luković, S., & Grbić, M. The causal relationship between government revenue and expenditure in Serbia. Economic Themes, 52(2), 2014, 127-138.
     Google Scholar
  11. Saysombath, P., & Kyophilavong, P. The causal link between spending and revenue: The Lao PDR. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(10), 2013, 111-116.
     Google Scholar
  12. Elyasi, Y., & Rahimi, M. The causality between government revenue and government expenditure in Iran. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 5(1), 2012, 129-145.
     Google Scholar
  13. Al-Zeaud, H. A. The causal relationship between government revenue and expenditure in Jordan. Global Journal of Management and Business Research. 2014.
     Google Scholar
  14. Al-Khulaifi, A. S. The relationship between government revenue and expenditure in Qatar: A cointegration and causality investigation. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(9), 2012, 142-148.
     Google Scholar
  15. Ravinthirakumaran, K. The relationship between government revenue and expenditure in Sri Lanka. In International conference on business and information, 2011, (ICBI-2011).
     Google Scholar
  16. Sani, S. R., Syahnur, S., Masbar, R., & Majid, M. S. A. Dynamic Causal Relationship between Government Expenditures and Revenues in Indonesia. In 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018). Atlantis Press.
     Google Scholar
  17. Taha, R., & Loganathan, N. Causality between tax revenue and government spending in Malaysia. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 2(2), 2008, 63-73.
     Google Scholar
  18. Jalil, M. A., & Hye, Q. M. A. Revenue and expenditure nexus: A case study of Romania. Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy, 1(1), 2010, 22-28.
     Google Scholar
  19. Carneiro, F., Faria, J. R., & Barry, B. S. Government revenues and expenditures in Guinea-Bissau: causality and cointegration. 2004.
     Google Scholar
  20. Abdulrasheed, B. Causality between government expenditure and government revenue in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, 4(2), 2017, 91-98.
     Google Scholar
  21. Azam, A., Rafiq, M., Shafique, M., Ateeq, M., & Yuan, J. Causality relationship between electricity supply and economic growth: evidence from Pakistan. Energies, 13(4), 2020, 837.
     Google Scholar
  22. Thabane, K., & Lebina, S. Economic growth and government spending nexus: Empirical evidence from Lesotho. African Journal of Economic Review, 4(1), 2016, 86-100.
     Google Scholar
  23. Okyere, F., & Kyei, L. Temporal Modelling of Producer Price Inflation Rates of Ghana. Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), 10 (3), 2014, 70-77.
     Google Scholar
  24. Pula, L., & Elshani, A. The relationship between public expenditure and economic Growth in Kosovo: Findings from a johansen co-integrated test and a granger causality test. Ekonomika (Economics), 97(1), 2018, 47-62.
     Google Scholar
  25. Merza, E., Alawin, M., & Bashayreh, A. The relationship between current account and government budget balance: The case of Kuwait. International Journal of Humanities and social science, 2(7), 2012, 168-177.
     Google Scholar
  26. Bojanic, A. N. Testing the validity of Wagner’s law in Bolivia: A cointegration and causality analysis with disaggregated data. Revista de Análisis Económico–Economic Analysis Review, 28(1), 2013, 25-46.
     Google Scholar
  27. Al-Qudair, K. H. The relationship between government expenditure and revenues in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Testing for cointegration and causality. Economics and Administration, 19(1). 2005, p35.
     Google Scholar