Global Performance of Associations



Abstract Views
253

Downloads
383

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Oct 22, 2020
Published Dec 30, 2020
10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.6.587

Abstract viewed = 253 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This article seeks to deepen the notion of global performance for associations. In order to highlight the specificity of this concept for this type of structure, we proceeded, first, by observing and identifying the specific managerial practices and tools for Social and Solidarity Economy organizations. Second, we attempted to suggest a conceptual model of associations’ performances that simultaneously takes into account the interactions between its different dimensions. The model will then be specified according to a structural equation model, which explains the causal relationships between the different dimensions of performance. Its validation is based on data collected from associations located in the Agadir Ida Outanane district-Morocco.

Keywords: Global performance; Social and Solidarity Economy; association

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Acquier A., Aggeri F. (2007), «Une généalogie de la pensée managériale sur la RSE». Revue française de gestion 11 (180): 131-157.
     Google Scholar
  2. Capron, M., Quairel-Lanoizelée, F. (2010). La responsabilité sociale d’entreprise. Paris-: La Découverte, coll. Repères.
     Google Scholar
  3. Baret P. (2006), «L’évaluation contingente de la Performance Globale des Entreprises: Une méthode pour fonder un management sociétalement responsable?», 2nd day of research du CEROS, pp. 1-24.
     Google Scholar
  4. Reynaud E. (2003), «Développement durable et entreprise: vers une relation symbiotique», AIMS day, Sustainable development workshop, ESSCA Angers, pp. 1-15.
     Google Scholar
  5. Marmuse, C. (1997). «Performance». In Joffre, P. et Simon, Y. (coord.), Encyclopedie de gestion, pp. 2194-2208.
     Google Scholar
  6. Capron M., Quairel-Lanoizelee F. (2005), «Evaluer les stratégies de développement durable des entreprises: l’utopie mobilisatrice de la performance globale», Sustainable Development Day - AIMS - IAE d'Aix-en-Provence, pp.1-22.
     Google Scholar
  7. Commissariat Général Du Plan (1997), Entreprise et Performance Globale, Economica, Paris, 256 p.
     Google Scholar
  8. Germain C., Trébucq S. (2004), «La performance globale de l’entreprise et son pilotage: quelques réflexions», social week Lamy, pp. 35-41.
     Google Scholar
  9. Pesqueux, Y. (2004), «La notion de performance globale en question», 5th International ETHICS Forum, Tunis.
     Google Scholar
  10. Lebas, M.J. (1995), «Performance Measurement and Performance Management». International Journal of Production Economics, 41, p. 23-35.
     Google Scholar
  11. Kaplan, Robert S. et Norton, David P., «The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance», Harvard, Business Review, Vol 71, n 1, January February 1992; «Putting the balanced scorecard to work», Harvard, Business Review, Vol 71, n° 5, September October 1993.
     Google Scholar
  12. GRI Standards, www.globalreporting.org/standards/.
     Google Scholar
  13. Elkington J. 1997), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 2lst Century Business, Capstone Publishing, Oxford.
     Google Scholar
  14. Dahir n 1-58-376 of 3 Joumada I 1378 (November 15, 1958) «règlementant le droit des associations», title I, article 1.
     Google Scholar
  15. Freeman R. E. (1984), «Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach», Pitman, Boston.
     Google Scholar
  16. Barney, Jay B., Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1) (1991): 99-120.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ambec, S. and Lanoie, P. (2008), «Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview». Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 22, n 4, p. 45-62.
     Google Scholar
  18. Laperrière, J. (2012). ENV 788 Treatment and prevention of pollution, Lecture notes. Sherbrooke, University Center for Environmental Training (CUFE), University of Sherbrooke, 30 p.
     Google Scholar
  19. Dowling. J., and Pfeffer. J., (1975), «Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior». Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226.
     Google Scholar
  20. Suchman, M.C., (1995), «Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches», Academy of Management Review, 20: 3, 571-610.
     Google Scholar
  21. Bitektine, A., (2011), «Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation and Status», Academy of Management Review, 36: 1, 151-179.
     Google Scholar
  22. Barnett. Michael. L., Jermier. John. M., and Lafferty. Barbara A., (2006), «Corporate Reputation: The Definitional Landscape». Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 9, No. 1.
     Google Scholar
  23. M Rhee, ME Valdez - Academy of Management Review, 2009 - journals.aom.org.
     Google Scholar
  24. Deephouse. David., Carter. Suzanne., (2005), «An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation». Journal of Management Studies. 42. 329-360. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x.
     Google Scholar
  25. Clarkson M. B. E. (1995), «A Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance», Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, pp. 42-56.
     Google Scholar
  26. Herman, R.D., Renz, D.O. (2004). «Advancing Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness Research and Theory: Nine theses». Nonprofit Management&Leadership18 (4): 339-415.
     Google Scholar
  27. Dalton, D., Todor, W., Spendolini, M., Fielding, G., & Porter, L. (1980). Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review. The Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 49-64. Retrieved October 18, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/257804.
     Google Scholar
  28. Griffin, J. and Mahon, J. (1997), «The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate». Business and Society, 36, 5-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600102.
     Google Scholar
  29. Cornett, M.M., A.J. Marcus and H. Tehranian, (2008), «Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management». J. Financial Econ., 87: 357-373.
     Google Scholar
  30. Richard, O.C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S. and Chadwick, K. (2004) Cultural Diversity in Management, Firm Performance, and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation Dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 255-266.
     Google Scholar
  31. Savall, H., Zardet, V. (2001), «Evolution des outils de contrôle et des critères de performance face aux défis de changement stratégique des entreprises», 22nd AFC Congress.
     Google Scholar
  32. Gadrey J., 2004, «L’utilité sociale des organisations de l’économie sociale et solidaire», synthesis report for DIES and MIRE.
     Google Scholar
  33. Dameron, S,. et Very, P. (2018), « Stratégie, information et diplomaties stratégiques : convergences et enjeux », Finance Contrôle Stratégie [En ligne], NS-3 | 2018, mis en ligne le 27 septembre 2018, consulté le 28 décembre 2020.
     Google Scholar
  34. Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
     Google Scholar
  35. Sarantakos, S. (1998). Social research (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14884-4
     Google Scholar
  36. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2003). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
     Google Scholar
  37. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill Book Company.
     Google Scholar
  38. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981), «Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error». Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
     Google Scholar
  39. Lahmouz, K. and Duyck, J.P. (2008), «Implication organisationnelle et stress professionnel, rôle de l’auto-efficacité». Communication to the 29th AGRH Congress, Dakar.
     Google Scholar
  40. Chin, W. W. (1998)., “The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.)”, Methodology for business and management. Modern methods for business research (p. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  41. Cohen, J. (1988), «Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)». Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  42. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. doi:10.2307/20650284.
     Google Scholar