##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Background and purpose: The implementation of Hospital Information System (HIS) is important to achieve strategic objectives based on quality services. For this reason, an evaluation is needed to find out how the benefits of HIS in the hospital work unit. This study uses the evaluation framework of Human, Organization, Technology (HOT) Fit which was introduced by Yusof in 2008.

Methods: This research method was carried out using a mixed method approach where the quantitative approach was processed by using Partial Least Square. The sample was obtained through proportionate stratified random sampling, namely 201 respondents who were employees of HIS users in MHJS hospital. The research instrument used a questionnaire and was measured using a Likert scale

Results: Based on the results of the t-statistic test, there is a misfit which appears in the insignificant direct effect between service quality on user satisfaction (p-value 0.062), service quality on system use (p-value 0.063), organizational structure for system use (p-value 0.492) and user satisfaction with system usefulness (p-value 0.188).

Conclusions: It is necessary to improve the service quality because does not significantly influence user satisfaction and system use. System quality provides a dominant influence on user satisfaction, the use of systems and organizational structures so that management plays a very important role in the implementation of HIS in MHJS hospital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430.
     Google Scholar
  2. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan RI No 82 Tahun 2013, (2013) (testimony of Kemenkes).
     Google Scholar
  3. Ward, J., & Peppard, J. (2002). Strategic Planning for Information Systems. In R. HIRSCHHEIM & B. RUDY (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons Ltd (Third, Vol. 26, Issue 4). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/26-4-340.
     Google Scholar
  4. Haux, R., Koch, S., Lovell, N. H., Marschollek, M., Nakashima, N., & Wolf, K. H. (2016). Health-Enabling and Ambient Assistive Technologies: Past, Present, Future. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, S76–S91. https://doi.org/10.15265/IYS-2016-s008.
     Google Scholar
  5. Zhao, P., Yoo, I., Lavoie, J., Lavoie, B. J., & Simoes, E. (2017). Web-based medical appointment systems: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6747.
     Google Scholar
  6. Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011.
     Google Scholar
  7. Reichertz, P. L. (2006). Hospital information systems - Past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(3-4 SPEC. ISS.), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.10.001.
     Google Scholar
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621.
     Google Scholar
  9. Gu, D., Yang, X., Li, X., Jain, H. K., & Liang, C. (2018). Understanding the role of mobile internet-based health services on patient satisfaction and word-of-mouth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091972.
     Google Scholar
  10. Petter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success : models , dimensions , measures , and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(April), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15.
     Google Scholar
  11. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
     Google Scholar
  12. Hakam, F. (2016). Analisis, Perancangan dan Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Kesehatan. Gosyen Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  13. Sari, M. M., Sanjaya, G. Y., & Meliala, A. (2016). Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit (HIS) Dengan Kerangka HOT - FIT. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Inonesia, 203–208.
     Google Scholar
  14. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60.
     Google Scholar
  15. Balaban, I., Mu, E., & Divjak, B. (2013). Development of an electronic Portfolio system success model: An information systems approach. Computers and Education, 60(1), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.013.
     Google Scholar
  16. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-244-8-132.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2014). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Metode dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program WarpPLS 4.0. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
     Google Scholar
  18. Erlirianto, L. M., Ali, A. H. N., & Herdiyanti, A. (2015). The Implementation of the Human, Organization, and Technology-Fit (HOT-Fit) Framework to Evaluate the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) System in a Hospital. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.166.
     Google Scholar
  19. Iivari, J. (2005). An Empirical Test of the DeLone-McLean Model of Information System Success. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1066149.1066152.
     Google Scholar