##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

All over the world, the growing demand for transport infrastructure is on its high and with it comes overstretched and widened fiscal constraints, leading governments to seek specialized financing cooperation between the public and private sectors, known as Public-Private-Partnership (PPP). This study sought to investigate the influence of public-private-partnership on implementation of railway transport project: A case of Standard Gauge Railway in Kenya. The objectives of the study were to determine the influence of public-private-partnership’s financing and private consortium on implementation of railway transport project. The study was grounded on the Agency and Game theories. The study adopted both descriptive survey and interview research designs. The study’s target population was the staff working at Kenya Railways, standard gauge railway consultant, standard gauge railway consultant contractor and PPP Unit, totalling to 100 respondents. The study’s sample size was 94. The study adopted purposive and stratified random sampling techniques. Quantitative data was collected through closed ended questionnaires while qualitative data was collected through interview guides. The quantitative data was coded by Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS). The statistical tools of analysis used for descriptive data were arithmetic mean and standard deviation, with the variables attaining a composite mean ranging between 3.885 and 4.195 and standard deviation ranging between 0.864 and 0.932. The statistical tools of analysis used for inferential statistics was Pearson Moment Correlation, with the variables attaining a strong positive correlation ranging between 0.735 and 0.889. The study concluded that public-private partnership’s financing and private consortium influence implementation of railway transport project. The study recommended that governments adopt public-private-partnership as the way forward to railway projects’ implementation and private consortium to have organization cultures that are simple to understand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. J. Klugman., “Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity: A better future for all,” Sustain. Equity A Better Futur. All (November 2, 2011). UNDP-HDRO Hum. Dev. Reports, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  2. Asian Development Bank, “Public-Private Partnerships,” Hand B., 2012.
     Google Scholar
  3. K. Kimathi., “Unpublished Master thesis on Factors Influencing Implementation of Infrastructure Projects,” A Case Road Constr. Proj. Machakos Cty., 2016.
     Google Scholar
  4. D. Albalate and P. Bel-Piñana., “The effects of public private partnerships on road safety outcomes,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 128, pp. 53–64, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  5. G. Levine,, “Organizations: A Quantum View,” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  6. J. Barlow., J. Roehrich., and S. Wright., “Europe sees mixed results from public-private partnerships for building and managing health care facilities and services,” Health Aff., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 146–154, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  7. S. Ismail., “Critical success factors of public private partnership (PPP) implementation in Malaysia,” Asia-Pacific J. Bus. Adm., 2013.
     Google Scholar
  8. A. Panayiotou and F. Medda., “Attracting private sector participation in infrastructure investment: the UK case,” Public Money Manag., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 425–431, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  9. K. Aaltonen., “Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 165–183, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  10. R. Jayaseelan and M. Tan., “‘PFI-cure for all ills,’” Edge Malaysia, pp. 72–74, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  11. Asian Development Bank, “Private Sector Assessment Pakistan. Manila,” 2010.
     Google Scholar
  12. Office of Prime Minister, “The Cabinet: Kenyan Ministries,” The Government Printer, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  13. OECD, “Recommendation of the council on principles for public governance of public-private partnerships,” Paris Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev., 2012.
     Google Scholar
  14. Railway Gazette, “Republic of Kenya,” Government Printer, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  15. The Government of Kenya, “The Ministry of Finance, Nairobi Kenya,” Government Printer, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  16. M. Dada and M. G. Oladokun, “Analysis of critical success sub-factors for public–private-partnerships in Nigeria,” ALAM CIPTA, Int. J. Sustain. Trop. Des. Res. Pract., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 13–26, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  17. L. Bing., A. Akintoye., J. Edwards, and C. Hardcastle, “The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  18. World Bank, The World Bank Annual Report 2015. The World Bank, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  19. The Government of Kenya, “Draft Policy on Aligning the Transport Sector with the Constitution,” Government Printer, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  20. J. Roehrich, M. Lewis, and G. George, “Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 113, pp. 110–119, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  21. M. W. Moszoro and P. Gasiorowski, “Optimal capital structure of public-private partnerships,” IMF Work. Pap., pp. 1–13, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  22. M. Arata., M. Petrangeli., and F. Longo, “Innovative approaches to implement road infrastructure concession through Public-Private Partnership (PPP) initiatives: a case study,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 14, pp. 343–352, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  23. M. Alhashemi., “Critical Success & Failure Factors for Public Private Partnership Projects in the UAE.” The British University in Dubai (BUiD), 2008.
     Google Scholar
  24. X. Zhang., “Critical success factors for public–private partnerships in infrastructure development,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  25. J. Laffont and D. Martimort, The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton university press, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  26. A. Hillman and T. Dalziel, “Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 383–396, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  27. H. Kerzner., Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  28. G. Cooke and P. Kothari, Principles of Corporate Finance, 7th Ed. Tat McGraw-Hill, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  29. D. Cooper., P. Schindler., and J. Sun., “Business research methods,” 2003.
     Google Scholar
  30. R. Krejcie and D. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, 1970.
     Google Scholar
  31. O. Mugenda and G. Mugenda, “Research methods,” 2003.
     Google Scholar