Did Asset Securitization Affect the Banking Financial Performance?



Abstract Views
1232

Downloads
996

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Dec 17, 2020
Published Jan 7, 2021
10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.1.666

Abstract viewed = 1232 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study investigates the impact of asset securitization on banking financial performance. The authors examined the effect between the independent variables (Asset-backed securities (ABS), Loan Loss Provisions (LLP), and Size), and the dependent variable (Return on Assets (ROA), Size has a moderating variable effect on Return on Assets.

The banks improved profitability (ROA) by selling their loans receivable portfolio to the capital market to get liquidity. Furthermore, the bank significantly changed the role of acting as intermediaries between borrowers and depositors for the last decade. The authors used a sample of 12 commercial banks from Southeast Asian Countries and the regression model used for panel data analysis from 1998 to 2018.

The results show that Asset-backed securities have found a significant positive Return on Assets. However, some empirical evidence found that asset securitization increases Profitability decreases Loan Loss Provisions and reduces bank securitization’s default risk.

For future research, it is recommended to explore several variables to get a better result bank’s financial performance, such as Return on Equity, Debt to Equity Ratio, and Net Interest Margin.

Keywords: Securitization; Return on Assets; Asset-backed securities; Banks

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ali, M. J., Mukulu, E., Kihoro, J. M., & Nzulwa, J. D. (2016). Moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between management participation and firm performance mohamud jama ali, elegwa mukulu, ph.d, john. m. kihoro, ph.d, joyce. d. nzulwa, ph.d. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 3(3), 223–238.
     Google Scholar
  2. Casu, B., Clare, A., Sarkisyan, A., & Thomas, S. (2013). Securitization and Bank Performance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(8), 1617–1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12064.
     Google Scholar
  3. Dietrich, A., & Wanzenried, G. (2011). Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2010.11.002.
     Google Scholar
  4. Giddy, Ian. Securities, A. (n.d.). Asset Securitization: Cost-Benefit Analysis. 1–10. United State. Stern School of Business New York University.
     Google Scholar
  5. Management, I., & Alves, P. (2018). The economics of securitization: Evidence from the European markets “The economics of securitization: evidence from the European markets.” 13(March 2016). https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(1).2016.10.
     Google Scholar
  6. Kara, A., Ozkan, A., & Altunbas, Y. (2016). Securitisation and banking risk: what do we know so far? Review of Behavioral Finance, 8(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-07-2014-0039.
     Google Scholar
  7. Liu, S. (2013). Determinants of the Profitability of the US Banking Industry *. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(22), 255–269.
     Google Scholar
  8. Loutskina, E. (2011). The role of securitization in bank liquidity and funding management. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.005.
     Google Scholar
  9. Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2016). The determinants of bank profitability: empirical evidence from European banking sector. In Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting (Vol. 14). https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-05-2015-0060.
     Google Scholar
  10. Santoso, Wijoyo (2014). Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan. Bank Indonesia Volume 17 No.2 Oktober 2014: Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  11. Tah, K. A., & Martinez, O. (2016). The effects of securitized asset portfolio specialization on bank holding company’s return, and risk. Studies in Economics and Finance, 33(4), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-11-2015-0267.
     Google Scholar