•   Ervie Nur Afifa Mukhlis

  •   Sylviana Maya Damayanti


PT. XYZ as one of telecommunications infrastructure providers that suffered losses gave a strong signal that the company was experiencing financial distress. Altman z-score is used to know the condition of the company. The result of Altman z-score analysis company has to further analyze the cause of financial distress. To prevent the company from bankruptcy risk, we cannot only focus on the financial aspect but also from various aspect. Enterprise risk management is used as a tool to identify what risks that could lead companies to experience financial distress and which risk should be mitigated. Risk assessment in this study using the analytic hierarchy process to check and reduce the expert inconsistency. After conducting risk management process, monitoring and review as the final step and implementation of this study. The result from this study is most of the risk are classified into high and medium risk can be mitigate by reduce or transfer the risk depend on the most suitable risk treatment. There are risks that classified as low risk, environment risk and promotion risk.

Keywords: Altman Z-Score; Analytical Hierarchy Process; Enterprise Risk Management; Financial Distress


K. BUMN, “Laporan Kinerja BUMN 2019,” BUMN, Kementerian. 2019.

H. Wandebori, Manajemen Strategi Dalam Perspektif Indonesia, 1st ed. Bandung: ITB Press, 2019.

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, “Penetrasi & Profil Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia,” Apjii, p. 51, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://apjii.or.id/survei2018s/download/TK5oJYBSyd8iqHA2eCh4FsGELm3ubj.

M. M. Hanafi, Manajemen Keuangan. Yogyakarta: BPFE, 2010.

K. A. Fachrudin, Kesulitan Keuangan Perusahaan dan Personal. Medan: USU Press, 2008.

G. Kunjana, “GCG di BUMN,” Investor Daily, 2020. https://investor.id/editorial/gcg-di-bumn (accessed Oct. 19, 2020).

E. I. Altman and E. Hotchkiss, Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. 2005.

R. W. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used,” Math. Model., vol. 9, no. 3–5, pp. 161–176, 1987, doi: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.

S. Aminbakhsh, M. Gunduz, and R. Sonmez, “Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects,” J. Safety Res., vol. 46, pp. 99–105, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.003.

M. A. Mustafa and J. F. Al-Bahar, “Project Risk Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 1991, doi: 10.1109/17.65759.

A. Alkhalidi, S. Tahat, and M. Smadi, “Risk assessment using the analytic hierarchy process while planning and prior to constructing wind projects in Jordan,” 2019, doi: 10.1177/0309524X19849862.

ISO 31000, “International Organization for Standardization ISO 31000: Risk management - Principles and guidelines,” vol. 2009, p. 36, 2009.

K. Madill, “Standards Australia,” 2003.

R. R. Moeller, COSO Enterprise Risk Management (Establishing Effective Governance, Risk, and Compliance Processes, Second edi., vol. 7, no. 2. New Jersey: Wiley Corporate F&A, 2011.

K. Srinivas, “Process of Risk Management,” Perspect. Risk, Assess. Manag. Paradig., pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.80804.

E. Risk, enterprise risk management (guidance for practical implementation and assessment. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New, 2014.


Download data is not yet available.


How to Cite
Mukhlis, E. N. A., & Damayanti, S. M. (2021). Enterprise Risk Management to Minimizing Financial Distress Condition Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in PT. XYZ. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.1.668