##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Risk management practices are currently a subject of interest and a novel impression beneath research and application by diverse organizations. Nevertheless, there seems much to be debated on this subject in terms of a general strategic risk management practices statement. There is uncertainty like, when there should be a declaration for each principal risk category the organization experiences or should exist a general risk management practices for the organization. A risk management practice is about achieving corporate goals. For many financial institutions (FIs), dual goals exist such as the social and economic perspectives. This study sought to analyze the effect of strategic risk management practices on corporate investment of selected financial institutions in Rwanda. The study aimed at establishing the effect of operational risk management practices, market risk management practices, compliance risk management practices and governance risk management practices on corporate investment in selected commercial banks in Rwanda. The study adopted descriptive research design. The study targeted 95 managers from finance, internal audit, risk compliance and operations departments. The sample size was 77 respondents. The research was conducted using primary and secondary data, which includes survey forms (questionnaires), interviews as well as reports of the targeted institutions. Information for the research were gathered utilizing organized surveys forms that were distributed to the targeted respondents. Narrative information obtained from interviews and open-ended questions in the questionnaire were analyzed using qualitative approaches. Validity and reliability of the instruments were tested using the Cronbach Alpha test retest methods. With the aid of Statistical Package for Social Science version 21.0, both descriptive statistics such as the means, modes, standard deviation, variances and inferential statistics were analyzed. The research revealed that management of operational risk has a constructive effect financial outcomes performance of financial institutions in Rwanda. The study found that there is a correlation between both operational risk management and market risk management and performance of the financial institutions. The research findings revealed that operational risk management (r=0.096, p<0.01), market risk management (r=0.506, p<0.01) and compliance risk (r=0.612, p<0.01) on corporate investments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alrashidi A, & Abdulaziz, O (2012), The impact of operation risk management on the financial development and economic growth, European Journal of Business and Management, 4(5): 15 -21.
     Google Scholar
  2. Althonayan, A., Keith, J., & Misiura, J. (2011), Aligning enterprise management with business strategy and information systems, European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on information systems, 11 (3): 30-31
     Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, T.J. (2008), The Performance relationships of effective risk management: Exploring the firm specific investment rationale, long range planning,41(2):155-176.
     Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, T.J. & Schroder, P.W. (2010), Strategic Risk Management Practice: How to deal effectively with major corporate exposures, Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  5. Barton, T.L. Shenkir,W.G.,& Walker, P.L.(2002), Making Enterprise Risk Management Payoff: How leading companies implement risk management, financial times/Prentice Hall, Upper saddle River, NJ.
     Google Scholar
  6. Beasley, M.S., Clune, R. & Dana, R., (2005), Enterprise Risk Management: An Empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation, journal of accounting and public Policy,24(6): 521-531.
     Google Scholar
  7. Basley, M.S., Clune, R.& Hermanson (2006). The impact of Risk Management on the internal audit function. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) Research foundation and the assistance. 2 (6): 1-28.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bettis, R. (1983), Modern Financial theory, corporate strategy and public policy: Three Conundrums, Academy of Management Review, 8,406-414.
     Google Scholar
  9. BNR, The Rwandan Banker (2016) Issue No. 27 August 2016 ISSN 2410-6844 Carey, A. (2001), Effective risk management in financial institutions: The turnbull approach, balance sheet,9(3),24-27.
     Google Scholar
  10. Chorafas, D.N. (2010), Managing operational risk: Risk Reduction strategies for investment and commercial banks (4th edn), London: Euromoney books.
     Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, P. (2007. International corporate governance: a comparative approach. Oxon: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  12. Conti,C.,and Mauri,A.,(2008), Corporate Financial Risk management: Governance and Disclosure post IFRS 7, Journal of Financial Risk Management,2 (7): 20-27.
     Google Scholar
  13. Cooper,D.R., and Schindler,P.S(2006),Business Research Methods, Empirical Investigation. Journal of Service Research, 1(2): 108-28.
     Google Scholar
  14. Crouhy, M., Galai,D.and Mark,R.,(2006),The essentials of Risk Management, New York: McGraw-Hill.
     Google Scholar
  15. Cummins,J.D., and Mahul,O.(2009a), Catastrophe Risk Financing in developing countries: Principles for public intervention, Washington DC: The international bank for reconstruction and development/ The World Bank.
     Google Scholar
  16. Doherty, N.A. (2006), Integrated Risk Management – Technologies and strategies for managing corporate risk, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
     Google Scholar
  17. Daud, W.N, Zald, M. & Hussein, R. (2010). The effect of employee involvement on enterprise risk management practices: Evidence from Malaysia. International business & Economic research Journal 9(11),34-45.
     Google Scholar
  18. Dorfman,M.S.,(2007), Introduction to risk management and insurance, (9englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall)
     Google Scholar
  19. Ekka P, Chaundry S, Sinha R (2011). Risk Management: Integrating SPM into microfinance capacity building. McGraw-Hill publishing, Co. Ltd. New Delhi India.
     Google Scholar
  20. Fraser, I., and Henry. W. (2007), Embedding strategic risk management: Structures and approaches, managerial auditing journal,22924):392-409
     Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert, C., (2007), Enterprise risk Management Techniques and Practices, incisive Media investment limited.
     Google Scholar
  22. Gomez, L.R(2005). A theory of global strategy and firm efficiencies: Considering the Effects of cultural diversity. Journal of Management,25(4), 587-606.
     Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, L.A., Loeb, M.P. and Tseng,C.Y.(2009), Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective, Journal of accounting and public policy, 2894),301-327.
     Google Scholar
  24. Gossy, G. (2008), A stakeholder rationale for risk management: Implications for corporate finance decisions google books.
     Google Scholar
  25. Gupta, P.K. (2009), Enterprise Wide Risk management strategic implications: challenge the knowledge society (3rd edn), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
     Google Scholar
  26. Holton, G.A. (2004), Defining Risk, Financial Analysts Journal, 60(6),19-25.
     Google Scholar
  27. International monetary Fund (IMF) (2008), Balance of payments and international Investment Position Manual (6th Edn), BPM6, Washington, DC: IMF.
     Google Scholar
  28. Jorion, P. (2001), Value at Risk – The New Benchmark for managing financial risk, McGraw- Hill, New York.
     Google Scholar
  29. Kaplan, R.S. (2009), Risk Management and the strategy execution system, Balanced scorecard report, 11(6), 1-6.
     Google Scholar
  30. Kleffner, A.E., Ryan, B.L and McGannon B. (2003), The effect of corporate governance of the use of enterprise risk management, Risk Management and insurance review, 6(1): 53-73.
     Google Scholar
  31. Kombo A., Wesonga J.; Muramba N.; & Makworo E.; (2011), An Evaluation of the Impact of Risk Management strategies on micro finance institutions’ financial sustainability: A case study of selected Micro finance institutions in Kisii Municipality, Kenya, Educational Research, 2(5), 1149-1153.
     Google Scholar
  32. Kothari, C.R., (2008), Research Methodology: methods and techniques, (2Prakashan.
     Google Scholar
  33. Kothari, S.P., Ramanna, K.; Skinner, D.J. (2010), Implications for GAAP from an Analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 50(2),246-286.
     Google Scholar
  34. Lam, J. (2003), Enterprise Risk Management: From Incentives to controls, Wiley Finance series, Wiley,
     Google Scholar
  35. Hoboken, Nj. Liebenberg, A.P., and Hoyt, R.E., (2003), The determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the appointment of chief risk officers, risk management and insurance review, 6,37-52.
     Google Scholar
  36. Liebenbeg, A., Hoyt, R., (2006) the determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the appointment of chief Risk officers. Risk Management and insurance review 6(1), 37-52
     Google Scholar
  37. Lintner, J. (1965), The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets, the review of economics and statistics, 47,13-37
     Google Scholar
  38. Mandelbrot, B., and Hudson, R.L. (2004), the Mis) Behavior of markets: A fractal view risk, ruin, and reward, London: Profile Books.
     Google Scholar
  39. Mango, D., (2007), An introduction to insurer strategic risk, guy carpenter and company; LLTC; 144-172.
     Google Scholar
  40. Markowitz; H.M. (1952); Portfolio selection; Journal of Finance 7(1),77-91.
     Google Scholar
  41. MCGee; R.W. (2009). Corporate governance in transition economies, springer, Florida.
     Google Scholar
  42. McShane; G.K.: Nair, A; & Rustambekov, E.(2013);The value of investing in enterprise risk management, Journal of accounting, Auditing and finance 16(4):641-658.
     Google Scholar
  43. Modigliani, F. & Miller; M.H. (1959; the cost of capital, corporate Finance & the theory of investment; American economic survey, 48,261-297.
     Google Scholar
  44. Moeller; R.R.; (2007); COSO Enterprise risk management – understanding the new integrated ERM framework, Wiley, Hoboken,Nj.
     Google Scholar
  45. Mozumdar, A.; (2001); Corporate Hedging & speculative incentives: Implications for swap market default risk, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 36(2);221-250).
     Google Scholar
  46. Nayak, K.; & Mohanty, H.;(2009); the Importance of ICT Risk Management in small to medium sized enterprises, United Kingdom, Journal for Technology Engineering Sciences; 5(2);33-47.
     Google Scholar
  47. Nocco; B.W. & Stulz; R.M.; (2006); Enterprise risk management: Theory and Practice, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance; 18(4): 8-20.
     Google Scholar
  48. Odoyo, F.S.; Omwomo, G. A.; and Okinyi; N.O.; (2014); An analysis of the role of internal audit in implementing risk management: a study of state corporations in Kenya; International Journal of business and social science, 5(6):169-176.
     Google Scholar
  49. Okochi, J. ; (2008), commodity hedging: Best Practices for modelling commodity exposures, Journal of corporate treasury management, 2(2):42-46.
     Google Scholar
  50. Olsson, R.;(2008); Risk management in a multi project environment: An approach to manage portfolio risks, International Journal of quality and reliability management ;25(1);60-71.
     Google Scholar
  51. Pagach; D.P. & Warr,R.S.(2007); An Empirical investigation of characteristics of firms adopting enterprise risk management, Econometric, 5(2):12-29.
     Google Scholar
  52. Pagach; D.P. and Warr, R.S. (2008), the Effects of enterprise risk management on firm performance, journal of finance, 52(2),737-783.
     Google Scholar
  53. Price Water House Coopers (PWC)(2012); Rising to the next flow. A Kenya perspective on 2012 state of the internal audit profession study, Nairobi: PWC Publication.
     Google Scholar
  54. Riley; J.(2012); Managing Risk: Contingency Planning, Southern Economic Journal ,40(3), 353-363.
     Google Scholar
  55. Rudolph; H.P.;(2009), State Financial Institutions: mandates, Governance and Beyond, Policy Research Working Paper, No 5141, The World Bank, Washington.
     Google Scholar
  56. Searle, I. (2008); Enterprise Risk Management, London: Spiramus Press.
     Google Scholar
  57. Sharpe, W.F. (1964); Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under conditions of Risk, The Journal of Finance; 19(3);425-442.
     Google Scholar
  58. Smyth, R. (2004); Exploring the Usefulness of a conceptual framework as a research tool: A Researcher’s reflections, issues in educational research; 14(3): 22-41.
     Google Scholar
  59. Stulz, R. (2003), Rethinking Risk Management: The revolution in corporate finance (4th Edition); Blackwell publishing:367-384.
     Google Scholar
  60. Tadesse, M., & Brans; M. (2012); Risk Coping Mechanisms; Journal of Economics and International Finance 4(4);79-91.
     Google Scholar
  61. Tapiero, C. (2004); Risk and Financial Management: Mathematical and computational Methods, John Wiley & Son.
     Google Scholar
  62. Vicente-Lorente, J.D. (2001); Specificity and Opacity as resources-based determinants of capital structure: Evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal; 22;157-177.
     Google Scholar
  63. Wang; H. & Reuer J.J. (2006); Risk reduction through acquisitions: The roles of firm specific investments and agency Hazards, Advances in mergers and Acquisitions 5(2): 25-49.
     Google Scholar
  64. Waweru, K. & Kisaka; H. (2012); The effect of enterprise risk management implementation on the value of companies listed in the NSE; AAA 2012 Management accounting paper.
     Google Scholar
  65. Wenk; D. (2005); Risk Management and business continuity; Overview and Perspective. Journal of the Chartered Insurance Institute; 3(3); 234-246
     Google Scholar
  66. Yakup; S. & Asli; T.; (2010); Financial hedging practices & Processes as a Part of Oil refining companies’ supply chain. Aalto University Apulensis Series Oeconomica 2, 663-671.
     Google Scholar
  67. Yow, S. & Sherris, M. (2008); Enterprise Risk Management, insurer value maximization and Market frictions; Astin Bulletin, 38 (1): 293-339.
     Google Scholar