Consumer Perception Influence Toward Capital Budgeting Efficiency for Culinary Business in Bandung, Indonesia



Abstract Views
526

Downloads
502

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 21, 2019
Published Aug 5, 2019
10.24018/ejbmr.2019.4.4.71

Abstract viewed = 526 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This research aimed to identify consumer perception which encompasses a consumer’s impression, awareness, and consciousness toward satay Taichan product to conduct and support the capital budgeting efficiency. This research will be conducted in Bandung, Indonesia area with range age of respondent 15-45 years old. Internal data of company and factors from the consumer perception are used to design the questionnaire. Recent satay Taichan product variation used to get the ideal price and product toward consumer perception and their tendency why choosing the product. Consumer perception information is formed for capital budgeting and finding factors causing the tendency to choose the product variation. The most important factor from the findings of this research that used to create the new product variation for satay Taichan in Bandung is the quality of the product. for some current value for a few current packages already enough appropriate for the market. Differentiation between package and detail rationalization is very important for the consumer to create their choice. The financial and accounting forecasting will be made as to the main source of capital budgeting efficiency decision.

Keywords: Consumer Perception, Culinary Business, Taichan Product Packages, Capital Budgeting, Bandung.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A. Pramono, Lezatnya Bisnis Kuliner, Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  2. K. G. Grunert, H. H. Larsen, T. K. Madsen and A. Baadsgaard, Market Orientation in Food and Agriculture, Springer US, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  3. T. S. Liao and R. John, "Innovation Investments, Market Engagement and Financial Performance: A Study among Australian Manufacturing SMEs," Research Policy, pp. 117-125, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  4. K. E. Clow and D. W. Vorhies, "Building a competitive advangtage for service firms: Measurement of customer expectation of service quality," Journal of Services Marketing, pp. 22-32, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  5. S. Atkinson, The Business Book, London: Dorling Kinderlsey Limited , 2014.
     Google Scholar
  6. D. V. Kousenidis, "A free cash flow version of the cash flow statement: a note," Managerial finance, pp. 645-643, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  7. P. C. Mark T. Chen, "ABC of Cash Flow Projections," AACE International Transactions, pp. PM. 02.1 - PM. 02.5, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  8. R. Rajendra, the handbook of global corporate treasury, Singapore : John Wiley and Sons , 2013 .
     Google Scholar
  9. M. Cristina, "Characteristic of the consumer preference reserach process," p. 2, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  10. K. L. Keller, "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity," Journal of Marketing, pp. 1-22, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  11. J. W. M. Orville C. Walker Jr, Marketing Strategy, Mew York: Mc Graw Hill, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  12. K. G. Grunert, "current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice," Trends in food science and technology , pp. 275-285, 2002 .
     Google Scholar
  13. R. Navon, "Construction Management and Economics," Resource-based model for automatic cash flow forecasting, pp. 501-510, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  14. Bradford D. Jordan, Randolph W. Westerfield, Stephen A. Ross, Fundamental of Corporate Finance, New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  15. Westerfield, Fundamental of Corporate Finance, New York, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  16. S. A. Ross, Funadamental of Corporate Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill , 2010.
     Google Scholar
  17. A. Bryan and E. Bell, Business Research Method, vol. IV, USA : Oxford University Press , 2015 .
     Google Scholar
  18. G. D. Israel, "Determining Sample Size : University of Florida Coorperation Extention Service," 1992.
     Google Scholar
  19. J. J. Tejada and J. R. B. Punzalan, "On the Misuse of Slovin’s Formula," Journal of Business and Management , pp. 901-912, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  20. K. Saumure and L. M. Given, "Convenience Sample," The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  21. I. Etikan, "Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling," Research Gate , pp. 2-4, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  22. R. Dhar and I. Simonson, "The Effect of Force Choice on Choice," Journal of Marketing Reseacrh, vol. 40, pp. 146-160, 5 2003.
     Google Scholar
  23. A. Field, Discovering Statistic Using SPSS, London: SAGE Publication, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  24. B. E. Whitley, Principles of Research in Behavioral Science, Boston: McGraw Hill, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  25. D. Straub, M. C. Boudreau and D. Gefen, "Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research," Communication of the Association for Information System, pp. 13, 340-487, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  26. D. Kahneman and D. T. Miler, "Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives," Psychological Review , pp. 93 (2), 136-135, 1986.
     Google Scholar
  27. H. Belyadi and F. Belyadi, "Economic Valuation," Science Direct, pp. 207-261, 2017.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)