A Correlation between Process Management and Procurement Efficiency in Manufacturing Sector


  •   M. Laraib

  •   M. Asim

  •   S. Manzoor


Procurement has been evolved with this era of evolution. Now procurement has become an important part of supply chain, hence the performance and the quality of procurement is measured for the continuous improvement. Here process management and process design play very crucial role. The study aims to identify the relationship between process management and the procurement efficiency. The literature review would support the finding of this study by previous studies and researchers’ findings showing the linkage between these two variables. Several researchers in the literature have addressed the positive impact on procurement efficiency by integrating, and implementing the process management approach, and drew their findings in the favor of this approach. The study is based on the qualitative research, for which the data was taken from the secondary sources, as well as from the primary source, through unstructured interviews from the procurement professionals in different organization of manufacturing sectors. The study concludes the valid and value added results, which are showing the significant and positive relationship between process management approach and the procurement efficiency. In addition, this leads to suggestion of some more valuable implementations.

Keywords: KPIs, Process Management, Procurement, Process Optimization


Amemba CS, Nyaboke PG, Osoro A, Mburu N. Challenges affecting public procurement performance process in Kenya. International Journal of Research in Management. 2013;3(4):41-55. Available: http://www.rspublication.com/ijrm/ijrm_index.htm.

Bureau of statistics. Number of Reporting Establishments [Internet]. Islamabad [cited 2020 Oct 29]. Available at: http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/1-number-reporting-establishments.

Darestani SA, Houshyar AN, Ismail N, Leman Z. Improving purchasing performance by implementation of QMS process management approach in a manufacturing company. InAdvanced Materials Research 2013 (Vol. 622, pp. 1868-1872). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Available: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.622-623.1868.

Galvin R. How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge?. Journal of Building Engineering. 2015 Mar 1;1:2-12. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352710214000023.

Kakwezi P, Nyeko S. Procurement processes and performance: Efficiency and effectiveness of the procurement function. International Journal of Social Sciences Management and Entrepreneurship (IJSSME). 2019 May 23;3(1). Available: http://mail.sagepublishers.com/index.php/ijssme/article/download/42/44.

Knudsen D. Procurement Performance Measurement System: Focusing on the Swedish Public Sector. from Lund Institute of Technology web site:

http://www. tlog. lth. se/documents/publications/Lic_Daniel_Knudsen.

Mitchell, M. Business Process Management (BPM) v workflow for procurement: What’s in a name?. Weblog. [Online] Available from: https://www.determine.com/blog/business-process-management-vs-workflow [Accessed 02 December 2020].

Psomas EL, Fotopoulos CV, Kafetzopoulos DP. Core process management practices, quality tools and quality improvement in ISO 9001 certified manufacturing companies. Business Process Management Journal. 2011 Jun 7. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/1463-7154.

Silver EA. Process management instead of operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 2004 Oct;6(4):273-9. Available:


Weitlaner D, Kohlbacher M. Process management practices: organizational (dis-) similarities. The Service Industries Journal. 2015 Jan 25;35(1-2):44-61. Available:



Download data is not yet available.


How to Cite
Laraib, M., Asim, M., & Manzoor, S. (2021). A Correlation between Process Management and Procurement Efficiency in Manufacturing Sector. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.2.776